Do not take our word for it Research it. And remember, Allah could have banned it the same way He banned alcohol. But He did not!! https://en.m.wikipedia.org/…/History_of_slavery_in_the_Musl…
He was married to at least 13 ladies, but had as much as 24 wives and concubines. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad%27s_wives
Some brothers and sisters will get angry when they see this post, but the Quranic verse is there. READ IT: 4:24.
Brainwashing children is wrong, could this be a solution? #exmuslim #tajikistan #arabictranslatedmemes
Pew research shows 23% of Muslim Americans do not believe in Islam anymore; 18% of British Muslims do not believe in Islam either. A BBC survey in 2019 showed that in just 5 years the percentage of Arabs who identify as none religious went up from 8% to 13%. These numbers are going up every day. Where are these people? Hiding!! Why? Because of the threat they get if they talk openly about leaving Islam from moderates as well as fundamentalists.
Another scientific error in the Quran. The Quran in these verses (see post) suggests that foetus grows as a dot, then small meat, THEN BONES, THEN COVER THE BONES WITH MEAT!! This used to be the medical knowledge of ancient Persia who were years ahead of Arabia. But still scientifically incorrect. Go take a look at the foetus development photos and show us where the bones come then the meat. Subhan Allah.
“He it is Who has created you from clay, and then has decreed a (stated) term (for you to die). And there is with Him another determined term (for you to be resurrected)”
[al-An’aam 6:2]
Wait for it... My Muslim brothers and sisters will come charging with anger. But this claim of humans made from clay is rubbish. This is based on old Greek mythology. No honest scientist would agree with it.
The Prophet (pbuh) used to have a wooden bowl in which he used to urinate and place under His bed. One night, He searched for it but did not find it and asked for it by saying, where is the bowl? The members of the house replied "Umm Salamah’s slave girl Barrah drank it". The Prophet replied, "surely she has protected herself from the hell fire by a great wall".
-Thabarani & Bayhaqi ( Ref : Imam Jalal al-Din Suyuti )
وَأخرج الطَّبَرَانِيّ وَالْبَيْهَقِيّ بِسَنَد صَحِيح عَن حكيمة بنت أُمَيْمَة عَن أمهَا قَالَت كَانَ للنَّبِي صلى الله عَلَيْهِ وَسلم قدح من عيدَان يَبُول فِيهِ ويضعه تَحت سَرِيره فَقَامَ فَطَلَبه فَلم يجده فَسَأَلَ عَنهُ فَقَالَ أَيْن الْقدح قَالُوا شربته برة خَادِم أم سَلمَة الَّتِي قدمت مَعهَا من أَرض الْحَبَشَة فَقَالَ النَّبِي صلى الله عَلَيْهِ وَسلم لقد احتظرت من النَّار بحظار
Imam Suyyuti narrates an authentic report in his al-Khasaa’is al-Kubra, vol. 2, page 253 (published by Daar al-Kutub al-Arabiy — some other online editions have this narration in vol. 2, page 441)
Egyptian Mufti As-Shaikh Dr. Ali Gum'a wrote in his book 'Religion and Life – Modern Everyday Fatwas' that the companions of the Prophet Muhammad would bless themselves by drinking his urine. Mufti As-Shaikh Dr. Ali Gum'a added, "[can also] be done with the honorable saliva, sweat, hair, urine or blood of the Prophet."
ඉරානය පහරදීම අරඹයි / මැදපෙරදිග කැළඹෙයි - Peace is a need:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jLEFoY7nLE&lc=z23viz1pmzfqgp0r404t1aokgjzsqg2bxg322kvibwsark0h00410.1578547653267212&feature=em-comments
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's what I left in the comments. Do you think he'll respond? If so, how? Is he going to play the Stockholm Syndrome card? Let's see!
=====
Let's move on to the story/hadith of how Quran verse 4:24 was revealed. The Muslims had just won a battle and were going to make slaves out of the surviving prisoners. It was normal for them to have intercourse with their female slaves (everyone did this, not just Muslims). Some of these women were still married (their husbands survived the battle) so a few people started to ask, “wait, these women are married and that would be adultery which we were told was forbidden.” So they brought it up to Muhammad and shortly after, Muhammad said that he received another Quran revelation stating that it’s not considered adultery if the woman is your slave. (the convenience of this revelation itself should raise an eyebrow)
While they COULD free and marry their slaves, it wasn’t a requirement at all. So at this point, many believers like to think that it was somehow consensual.
And that the women had the option of saying “no”
And that the women knew that if they refused, their masters would not follow through.
Or that the slave masters grew on the women during the waiting period to the point where they wanted it too.
But people don’t realize that Muhammad also stated that it’s forbidden for even a wife to refuse any sexual advance from her husband (unless he’s sick, injured, etc). Some like to think that Muhammad was referring to an ongoing problem of a sexless marriage but:
1. Look at the language: “if a woman refuses her husband’s calls to bed & he goes to bed angry, the angels will curse her UNTIL THE MORNING.” It’s clearly saying that a woman can NEVER turn down sex; that any time a man requests it, she must oblige.
2. Even if that were the case, most marriage counselors agree that fear/shame is a pretty bad tactic to fix marital problems.
So if Muhammad’s belief and teaching was that wives consent doesn’t matter, it’s very counterintuitive to claim that the consent of these women was of any concern to Muhammad and/or the author of the Quran.
And the fact that times were different then and that stuff like this was normal doesn’t change the experience of the victim. Whether it’s 630AD or 2020AD, a woman captured by force and made to be the property of another person would likely not want to have consensual sex w/that person. And time/location doesn’t actually mean the experience wasn’t bad for the victim, it just kind of excuses the people who did it because they didn’t know any better.
Furthermore, they were guided by god so if they didn’t know better, why would their god cater to that? At the expense of some innocent women?
Let's move on to the story/hadith of how Quran verse 4:24 was revealed. The Muslims had just won a battle and were going to make slaves out of the surviving prisoners. It was normal for them to have intercourse with their female slaves (everyone did this, not just Muslims). Some of these women were still married (their husbands survived the battle) so a few people started to ask, “wait, these women are married and that would be adultery which we were told was forbidden.” So they brought it up to Muhammad and shortly after, Muhammad said that he received another Quran revelation stating that it’s not considered adultery if the woman is your slave. (the convenience of this revelation itself should raise an eyebrow)
While they COULD free and marry their slaves, it wasn’t a requirement at all. So at this point, many believers like to think that it was somehow consensual.
And that the women had the option of saying “no”
And that the women knew that if they refused, their masters would not follow through.
Or that the slave masters grew on the women during the waiting period to the point where they wanted it too.
But people don’t realize that Muhammad also stated that it’s forbidden for even a wife to refuse any sexual advance from her husband (unless he’s sick, injured, etc). Some like to think that Muhammad was referring to an ongoing problem of a sexless marriage but:
1. Look at the language: “if a woman refuses her husband’s calls to bed & he goes to bed angry, the angels will curse her UNTIL THE MORNING.” It’s clearly saying that a woman can NEVER turn down sex; that any time a man requests it, she must oblige.
2. Even if that were the case, most marriage counselors agree that fear/shame is a pretty bad tactic to fix marital problems.
So if Muhammad’s belief and teaching was that wives consent doesn’t matter, it’s very counterintuitive to claim that the consent of these women was of any concern to Muhammad and/or the author of the Quran.
And the fact that times were different then and that stuff like this was normal doesn’t change the experience of the victim. Whether it’s 630AD or 2020AD, a woman captured by force and made to be the property of another person would likely not want to have consensual sex w/that person. And time/location doesn’t actually mean the experience wasn’t bad for the victim, it just kind of excuses the people who did it because they didn’t know any better.
Furthermore, they were guided by god so if they didn’t know better, why would their god cater to that? At the expense of some innocent women?
We do not tolerate people attacking all Muslims. Muslims are our mothers, fathers, brothers, and sisters....they are good people born into a brainwashing machine. But in their hearts of hearts, they are good people like you and us. We are here to open their eyes to what really Islam says. That is why we focus on the teaching, practices, and hypocrisy of Islamic beliefs. We never generalise to suggest every person who has a Muslim name or believes in Islam is a bad person. Remember to show them love and be patient with them as they open their eyes for the first time. ❤️❤️❤️
It is unfair to rely on Muslim sources to know how women lived before Islam. For history is written by the winners. But we do know something about women's rights BEFORE ISLAM from the story of Khadijah, Muhammad's first wife.She was an independent business woman, she was the richest of Quraishi tribes, she had the largest convoy of camel who traded with Palestine and Syria, had married two men before Muhammad, she choose her own husbands, in fact she choose Muhammad who was HER OWN EMPLOYEE! Muhammad never dared to marry on her while she was alive. What Muhammad did after he took control? Women to stay at home, cover from head to toe, not allowed to engage in business on their own, have to ask male guardian to get married... Demolition of Women's rights. But we need to buy the story that the pagans of Arabia buried baby girls alive... We, in Islam, burry them for life. Al Hamdullah.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khadija_bint_Khuwaylid
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khadija_bint_Khuwaylid
Colombomail Today reported recently that all new female Muslim entries of state owned University of Colombo had to comply strictly with a set dress code. ( https://bit.ly/2QGxRQ8 ) The dress code consisting of the Abaya, shoes and bag had to all be in pure black, the colour favoured by the infamous ISIS. This compulsion is carried out by the senior Muslim students of the same university.
There are complaints by freshman Muslim female students that the so called ‘Muslim Majlis' of state universities have taken it upon themselves to go to the extent of policing them to make sure they do not have any kind of interactions or communications with male students of other communities. This continues as a very unhealthy development even after the recent extremist Islamic terrorist activity, which culminated in the killing of more than 300 hundred and wreaking havoc in the lives of thousands of innocents. Unless the Government and authorities concerned sit up and take notice of this kind of undemocratic, discriminatory and imposing behavior by the Islamic bodies in universities, it's only a matter of time before matters would get out of hand.
The burning question at hand is, why are these extremist elements allowed to openly operate in State Universities? Haven't we paid the price for turning a blind eye to Islamic terrorist extremism or is it going to take another Easter Bombing for the relevant authorities to sit up and take note?
We recently brought to light the conduct of the so called Muslim Majlis of the University of Sri Jayawardenepura, where matters are conducted in extremist Talibanic style, banning all females students from exposing their faces in the official committee photograph. (https://www.facebook.com/cemsl.org/posts/1309700819218052 ) The social media pages of the same Muslim Majlis have completely blackout the pictures of female students as only the pictures of Muslim male students allowed for publication.
We recently brought to light the conduct of the so called Muslim Majlis of the University of Sri Jayawardenepura, where matters are conducted in extremist Talibanic style, banning all females students from exposing their faces in the official committee photograph. (https://www.facebook.com/cemsl.org/posts/1309700819218052 ) The social media pages of the same Muslim Majlis have completely blackout the pictures of female students as only the pictures of Muslim male students allowed for publication.
It goes without saying that these in high Seats of Learning are funded by the taxpayers money, in order that they may in return produce worthy citizens capable of serving the nation. Whether universities, schools and educational institutes should be allowed to be the breeding ground for unsavory terrorists is food for thought.
All the materials containing, teaching and preaching violence, war, rape, slavery, bigotry, hatred, murder should be completely removed from the books including Qur'an, Hadees, Thafseers, Tharjumas, Fiqh Kithabs etc.
All religions schools should be closely monitored and regulated regardless of which religion or sect they belonged to. Sri Lanka does not need radical Moulavis, Monks or Priests.
News : Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa has ordered the Muslim Religious Affairs Department to register all Muslim religious schools (Madrasas) with the Department.
He also instructed officials of the Department to re-evaluate the curricula of all Madrasas and prepare an updated curriculum with the assistance of the Education Ministry.
The Quran is full of metaphorical descriptions, which means one can make out anything out of it. Ultimately, Dawah people are looking for someone who is ready for the bind faith test based on one or two arguments. You pass it, you are in. But there are many Ex-Muslim pages found online, on Ex-Muslim books on Amazon, and Ex-Muslim YouTube videos taking about scientific errors, morality and logical problems in Islam that shows all the garbage.
Here is a good and short 10mins YouTube video about the 43 scientific errors in the Quran. The test of blind faith is that most Muslims will never open this link. Enjoy.
https://youtu.be/677lMXleqWI
https://youtu.be/677lMXleqWI
Muslims go to a place in Mecca to throw stones on the "Devil's House", but in the cross fire, many Muslims get hit and some are known to die. We think not crossfire. .. We think the devil is responding. 😂😂
Only joking, as atheist we do not believe the devil is real. To suggest that any true atheists worship the devil is stupid. To believe in the devil is to believe there is a god in the first place. Those who do, are rebellious idiots who probably do believe in a god but angry with him. We are not angry, we just see facts.
The devil (like the jins) made up scarecrow to frighten people. In fact, Jins are an Arabian pagan myth that Muhammad copied. There is no record of Jins in all of the so called Heavenly books that supposedly the same god sent. Absolutely nothing in the Torah or Bible. When we grow up, we are suppose to realise the boogeyman is made up story invented by adults to keep us behaved... Not for the 1.5 billion people in blind faith.
Was Muhammad a womaniser? Absolutely, many Muslim men acknowledge that. Was he a corrupted politician and writing the Quran himself? Let's see.
Muhammad was supposedly a humble messenger of Allah. To. Follow everything Allah told Him to do. But when Allah said maximum of four wives, Muhammad had at the time of this story 9 wives, many concubines, and still to Aisha shock, Muhammad was sleeping with any Muslim who came along, even without the approval of a guardian. So she kick up a fuss with Muhammad, like what the hell!! But next day "Allah" responded with an out of jail card... Subhan Allah. Can you guess what Aisha response was, "I feel that your Lord hastens in fulfilling your wishes and desires." Sahih Bukhari 6:60:311
Muhammad was supposedly a humble messenger of Allah. To. Follow everything Allah told Him to do. But when Allah said maximum of four wives, Muhammad had at the time of this story 9 wives, many concubines, and still to Aisha shock, Muhammad was sleeping with any Muslim who came along, even without the approval of a guardian. So she kick up a fuss with Muhammad, like what the hell!! But next day "Allah" responded with an out of jail card... Subhan Allah. Can you guess what Aisha response was, "I feel that your Lord hastens in fulfilling your wishes and desires." Sahih Bukhari 6:60:311
You can read this and many more on demand verses that Muhammad invented on the go (if you dare) from here:
https://wikiislam.net/w…/Muhammad's_Just_In_Time_Revelations
https://wikiislam.net/w…/Muhammad's_Just_In_Time_Revelations
Ex-Muslims Of Norway
Reporter: Why you marrying your daughter so young?
Father: 18 years old girls not suits for us man. We want girls like 13, 14, 15 years old ages. Nobody wants 18 years old girl.
------
A BBC Arabic investigation has exposed a secret world of sexual exploitation of children and young women by clerics in Iraq.
The practice of temporary marriage, illegal under Iraqi law, is being used by some clerics to exploit women and children for money.
Father: 18 years old girls not suits for us man. We want girls like 13, 14, 15 years old ages. Nobody wants 18 years old girl.
------
A BBC Arabic investigation has exposed a secret world of sexual exploitation of children and young women by clerics in Iraq.
The practice of temporary marriage, illegal under Iraqi law, is being used by some clerics to exploit women and children for money.
Young Iraqi girls are being sold for sex under the name of Nikah al-Mut'ah (temporary pleasure marriage) in Islam that can last as short as an hour-long "marriage."
--------------
"I married a woman and went to the Prophet, he said: 'O Jabir! Have you married?' I said: 'Yes.' He said: 'A virgin or a matron?' I said: 'A matron.' He said: 'Why didn't you marry a young girl, so that you may play with her and she with you?' I said: 'O Messenger of Allah! My father died and left behind seven - or nine - daughter, so I have brought someone who can look after them.'"
Jami` at-Tirmidhi 1100/ Sahih al-Bukhari 6387
"I married a woman and went to the Prophet, he said: 'O Jabir! Have you married?' I said: 'Yes.' He said: 'A virgin or a matron?' I said: 'A matron.' He said: 'Why didn't you marry a young girl, so that you may play with her and she with you?' I said: 'O Messenger of Allah! My father died and left behind seven - or nine - daughter, so I have brought someone who can look after them.'"
Jami` at-Tirmidhi 1100/ Sahih al-Bukhari 6387
It was narrated that 'Aishah said:
"The Messenger of Allah married me when I was six, and consummated the marriage with me when I was nine."
Sunan an-Nasa'i 3379 / Sahih al-Bukhari 5133
"The Messenger of Allah married me when I was six, and consummated the marriage with me when I was nine."
Sunan an-Nasa'i 3379 / Sahih al-Bukhari 5133
Video: https://www.facebook.com/exmuslims.no/videos/1143415639339408
--------------------------------
CEMSL calls the government to ban FGM in Sri Lanka.
============
Parents bring girls as young as 3 months old to undergo the procedure that is known to cause sexual dysfunction, cysts, and birthing complications.
“This is a matter of faith,” Romly, the organiser of the circumcision event, said. “Sometimes faith cannot be rationalised, right? We are just following Islamic law. If it were forbidden, we would be against it.”
Farah said “I was circumcised, and so were my grandmother and great grandmother. We believe circumcision is a religious teaching,”
“We do this to emulate the attitudes of Prophet Mohammed, primarily his holiness and purity,” Deden Syamsul Romly, coordinator of the event and head of research and development at the foundation, told VICE.
A total of 230 boys and girls took part in the mass circumcision. Every child who was circumcised received a goodie bag with Rp200,000 ($14.57) and snacks.
No comments:
Post a Comment