How it al began.
Suresh Wanayalaege:
Theravada Abdhidamma is much better than the Mahayana concepts because Abhidhamma explains how concepts emerged from ultimate-meaningful (Paramartha) realities (Dhamma).
Nils Eldor Alterskjær:
So, how much do you actually know about Mahayana? Did you get teachings directly from a Tibetan Lama? Did you study the non-duality of the Dzogchen? I am not much for better or worse, Siddharta's teachings are diverse in the way it is explained simply because humans are so different and need to see things from different views to grasp the Dharma of the Awakened one.
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@Nils Eldor Alterskjær, Non-duality is an idea of Mahayana scholars and a few Hindus. Likely, it is an emerged concept to explain the nature of emptiness. But Theravada teachings explain many types of emptinesses and how they behave. The four main types of emptinesses are matter, Citta, emotions, and Nibbana. It is the best explanation because it shows how exactly those emptinesses are related to each other.
Nils Eldor Alterskjær:
@Suresh Wanayalaege I asked you if you have studied it, with a qualified Lama?
... I will just get to the point. I do not know you, nor do you know me. You have no idea who I am. I have studied and practiced Buddhism for 50 years under the greatest teachers in Mahayana of our time, including H.H. Dalai Lama. There is one thing I am not fond of when people are sectarian and only comment as they think they themselves are right and others are wrong. Is it not a bit presumptuous to think that you have all the answers and that all those people in India and Tibet, in China and Japan, and Mongolia and Vietnam have all been wrong for the past 2500 years and you know the truth? What do you think? Is it simply so that you comment here to show superiority, or is it that you like to correct me? Thus I ask, have you actually studied those teachings that you claim are wrong?
I am sorry if I am harsh, but your behavior is not in line with the Buddha's teachings and you are hurting others and yourself. You are spreading conflict and non-compassion in the Sangha, when you comment on, what I presume are teachings you know very little about. I might be wrong.
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@Nils Eldor Alterskjær, Hinduism and propagandas of Hindus influenced Mahayana tradition and that is why Mahayana practitioners are like Hindu meditators who mostly focus on concentration (Samadhi/Samatha) meditations. Theravada tradition mainly uses Vidharshana/Vipassana (special seeing) meditations, using its teachings on ultimate nature of the mind and body. The ultimate nature of the mind and matter explained in those texts are ultimate truths and highly systematic. Those teachings are not like word salads. According to those teachings, the lifetime of the ultimate mind is 17 times smaller than the lifetime of the ultimate matter. The mind emerges on matter, and continues a process of becoming (1), vibrating (2), sub-breaking (3), scaning (4), observing (5), receiving (6), investigating (7), directing (8), absorbing (9-15), and resulting (16-17) within the lifetime of ultimate matter. Those teachings are highly logical and direct teachings about the ultimate nature of us. Truth should be revealed even if it challanges our opinions.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nirvana is Already Here and Now | Non Duality Awakening | Zen Buddhism
Suresh Wanayalaege:
The liberation from the five aggregates of clinging called matter, feelings, identification, emotions/thoughts, and knowledge/awareness is Nirvana. Those aggregates are ultimate truths, and they are impermanent, suffering, and non-self. Learning to manage those aggregates is very important to attain enlightenment. Have a great day. ❤
Beyond Thought:
Indeed. The five aggregates are very much important to be conscious of as humans, then we can peel back the layers so the One mind shines through. Coming from the Soto Zen Way, I view enlightenment a little differently in regards to the world “attain”, but nonetheless, the the five aggregates are very important to be a good human.
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@Beyond Thought, Understanding the impermanance or non-self nature of the mind and body are the two main mouths of liberation. Therefore, looking at the process of five aggregates is useful. It removes self-veiw (Sakkhaya-ditti), permanence (Nitya-sangna), and good-lookingness (Suba-sangna) helping to remove greed.
Beyond Thought:
%100 agreed my friend 🙏🏼
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard Dawkins on Evolution
6 Ex-Muslim Christians Face Death Penalty For Conversion In Libya
Suresh Wanayalaege:
It is terrifying when highly educated people are supporting violence to protect their faith. Your vioce is very important to wake people up. 🙏
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How to Reduce the Chances of a Heart Attack? | Vantage with Palki Sharma
varun:
For diseases like heart, we should do pranayam daily & detox our body by consuming wheatgrass juice daily !!
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@varun, Cholesterol causes heart attacks. Boiling water with Garlic, Fenugreek, and Paper to drink it in the morning is the best solution to reduce Cholesterol.
varun:
@Suresh Wanayalaege there are many types of heart diseases other than cholesterol (CAD), like heart enlarging, problem in heart muscles etc, detoxing our body & doing pranayam "cure & prevent" all of them 👍🏾
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@varun, Yes. 👍
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our Mind Is Like a Garden! 05-24-23
There Is Nobody Here
SJL278 | Buddhist देशों में Ramayan क्यों? | Ramayana in Thailand, Indonesia ? | Science Journey
Buddhist History of Kashmir (Part 2): The Rise of Islam
Suresh Wanayalaege:
👍👍👍 Presumably, Chandraguptha Maurya invaded the Magadha Kingdom with the help of Europeans and Brahamins. Presumably, Magadha was a Buddhist Kindom before his invation. Chandraguptha's invasion could cause to decline the early Buddhist culture in Magadha. Early Buddhist and Jain texts are somewhat reliable, and according to those texts Dhana Nanda was a legitimate king, and his father was a son of a King. Brahamins and Hindus try to justify the Chandraguptha's invation by changing the identity and character of King Dhana Nanda by changing his illegitimate brother Uggresena's identify and character (giving his brother Uggresena's identity and character to his father). Also, some new religions and modified versions of religions developed after that. Some stories are more complicated than we think, and they have a lot of root causes. Thank you so much for your explanations. 👍👍👍
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Uncover the Unexpected Connection between Science and Buddhism with Alan Watts!
Suresh Wanayalaege:
Abhidhamma is the most scientific teachings in Buddhism. The four utmost realities called Paramartha Dhamma mentioned in Abhidhamma are 28 material forms, mind-beauty (Citta), 52 emotional qualities, and Nibbana/Nirvana. Understanding the processes of them help to attain enlightenment to liberate from the five aggregates (matter, feelings, identification, emotions, awareness) of clinging. Thank you.
Finally Detached:
Thank you for sharing this with everyone!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THIS IS LIFE IN BHUTAN: The most isolated country in the world?
"thought forms" the key to bending reality
You Need To Watch This Video! (IMPORTANT) | Attention: Path to Transformation
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is Buddhism inspired by Vedic Scriptures ? | Hidden Truth | Myth vs Truth
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7imevMFGo8
Pranesh Shukla:
This is the best reply of those who said Buddhism is better than Hinduism and also older than Hinduism 😊
Jai shree krishna 🙏❤️
Suresh Wanayalaege:
Hindus took Rama from Buddhism and modified his story.
Rani Jal:
@Suresh Wanayalaege Aah....YeS
RaMaYaN JuSt Came ReCeNtLy🤓
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@Rani Jal, Jataka Tale didn't mention Ravana, Lanka, Hanuman, a war and a lot more things. Sita was sister of Rama-Pandith. Hindus could take it and other stories to make Ramayana. Existing Valmiki's Ramayana texts are not much old. Also, Sanskrit scripts and texts are not older than 500 BCE. Oral Sanskrit doesn't make written Sanskrit older than 500 BCE. Modern Hinduism developed to protect Brahamanism.
Rani Jal:
@Suresh Wanayalaege Cope Harder🗿
We all know that those Buddhist Followers just copied from Ramayana and changed the entire story of our Lord Rama
Like WTF In jataka tales Sita was his Sister? And she left Rama and went back to the Palace with Lakkhan
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@Rani Jal, You can't show a statue of Rama older than 500 BCE. Rama-Pandith was a previous life of the Siddhartha Gauthama. Hindus tried to make him an Avatar of Vishnu https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHnC9KAj4vI and Hindus tried to take him into Hinduism.
F4 Rex:
@Suresh Wanayalaege old clue of Buddhism 75ce , can u show me older than this ?
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@F4 Rex, King Ajasathru sponsored the fist Buddhist council. The emperor Ashaka sponsored the third Buddhist council, and he made Stupas and stored relics of the Buddha and Sangha. And his enlightened (Arhat) son Mihindu visited to Sri Lanka and converted the Sri Lankan King and people. And a lot of cultural changes happened after 500 BCE.
Rani Jal:
@Suresh Wanayalaege So U saying that the 6000 yrs old rock carvings of Lord Rama and Hanuman which was found in Iraq are fake🤡
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@Rani Jal, Yes. The carving depicts the armed Mesopotamian ruler Tardunni who lived there 4000 years ago with defeated Hurrian soldiers without a tail.
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@F4 Rex, Brahamin Chanakya and his supporters removed the King Dhana Nanda in Magadha while Nanda kingdom had a war with Alexander. And they don't have or hide records about Porus and Abisares who faced Alexander during the war. Alexander's records mention those names and they usually didn't use correct name of them. Probably, they were Mahapadmananda and his nephew Uggresena. Also, they mention that Porus's son tried to help him. Likely, Dhana Nanda sent his armies to protect his father. Meanwhile, Chanakya and Chandraguptha could easily invade Magadha and kill Dhana Nanda. And then, someone called Parusharam killed Kshathriya's. But Abisares could escape and survive. Most likely, Hindus have tried to change the identity of Parushuram too. Likely, Brahamins and Hindus tried to make new stories to redirect the mind of historiens and hide their violence. But a lot of Hindu stories contain a lot of violence too.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
සක්වළ වක්රය ගැන විමර්ශනය -- Investigating the circle of the world system called the Sakwala Chakra
United Nations' Day of Vesak talk | Ajahn Brahmali | 2023
Suresh Wanayalaege:
Realization of the non-self nature of life is very important to be peaceful. Sadhu Sadhu Sadhu 🙏🙏🙏
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Life Has No Meaning - Alan Watts - Trust Nature: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O6yYi1E4DzI
Suresh Wanayalaege:
The purification of the mind makes the life purposeless, and liberates it from the body within 7 days, unless that person has a purpose to teach it to others, according to Theravada Dhamma teachings. Thank you. 👍
@itapproaches7543:
7 days? lololol, the waking up process takes 1-2 years. Longer the older the human is when they start.
@smlanka4u:
@itapproaches7543 , A fully enlightened lay person dies within 7 days if that person doesn't become a monk within 7 days according to the fundamentals of Theravada.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What Makes Buddhism Unique? | Ajahn Brahmali | 16 June 2023
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How Bollywood turned Hindu Epics to Jokes? | AKTK https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNlAwftjh8o
VC:
In this case I will support Nepal
This is not Ramayan it's a joke
Jay Sri ram🚩❤
Suresh Wanayalaege:
Ramayan is a modified story of the Jataka tale. Therefore, Ramayan is a myth.
Pro Indian:
@Suresh Wanayalaege Gautam Budha badme aye hai ... aise to kal koi kr movement hoga n bolenge jataka tales bhi fake h.
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@Pro Indian , Seeta/Sita was Rama's sister in the Buddhist tale. Jains tried to copy it too. The Jataka tale didn't mention Lanka, Ravana, Hanuman and many others. Also, there are no statues of Rama older than 500 BCE. Buddhist carving shows the Rama and Sita in the Jataka tale. New stories about Rama originated after the Brahamin Chanakya's invation with the help of Chanraguptha Maurya.
VC:
@Suresh Wanayalaege ramayan is our truth ♥️
It's older than any other relegion those were not existed
Pro Indian:
@Suresh Wanayalaege Budhism came after Hinduism hence no claim of Budhism I would like to question Ramayan.
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@VC, Vedas were Brahamin's texts. Hinduism developed after the fist council of Jainism with the help of Maurya Empire. Chanakya took Magadha Kindom from Buddhist kings while Porus (Padmananda) was fighting with Alexander. His son (Dhana Nanda) sent an army to protect him according to Greek records. But Maurya's empire tried to hide those records with the help of new stories.
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@Pro Indian , Sanskrit scripts and texts are not older than 500 BCE. And oral Sanskrit doesn't make written Sanskrit older than 500 BCE. Brahamanism survived with the help of modern Hinduism after the Buddhist Magadha kingdom lost power due to Chandraguptha's invation with the help of Brahamin Chanakya. And they made new stories to hide their violence against Kshathriyas.
Pro Indian:
@Suresh Wanayalaege civilizational memory is often oral. In this way Buddha was also not a pious soul he was just a monk and got populsr because of being from Royal background.
No one wants to hear from a person from different religion. Even if its a myth I want to believe in Buddha and Ramayan as they teach us values.
@Shiva-nx1tn:
Suresh Wanayalaege Jataka tales are not older than ramayana returned by Valmiki thats the copied version and also other stories including Indra ,Mitra ,Varuna and Buddha himself .I dont know which weed do you smoke
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@Shiva-nx1tn, Jataka stories were extracted from Theravada Thripitaka and commentaries. Likely, modern Hindus took Indra concept from Sakra Devendra mentioned in Buddhist texts. And Vishnu from Varuna, etc. You can't show any original text of Ramayana older than 100 BCE.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kya Buddha se pahle hindu dharm tha? Hinduism is copied from Buddhism? | Facts CHECK: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h87IJu-uwic
Suresh Wanayalaege:
Rama belongs to Buddhism. Hindus took him to develop Ramayan.
@ParmeshwariAswal-yo2lb:
Suresh Wanayalaege evidence??
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@ParmeshwariAswal-yo2lb, The existing texts of Ramayana are not older than 100 BCE (maximum). Jainism contains another story about Rama, and Jainism's texts could develop after 300 BCE with the first council of Jains. The Bodhisathwa called Rama-Pandith was a non-violent person, and Sitha was his sister. The support for Brahamanism and Jainism could increase with the establishment of the new Magadha empire after 321 BCE. The Buddhist Kings in Magadha lost their power after 321 BCE, and it could be a reason to develop new texts and Brahamanism friendly religions like Jainism, Hinduism, Mahayana, etc.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SJL284 | समस्त मुंडा जाति बौद्ध थी । Munda Tribes Culture still follows Buddhism | Science Journey
SJL282 | Buddhism se Hinduism or Brahmanism कब, कैसे और किसने बनाया? | Science Journey
@SS-ct4hv:
AAP GREAT HO SCIENCE JOURNEY JI🤗🤗 AAP JAISA KOI NAHI🙏🙏🙏 SALUTE AAP KO DIL SE 💙💙💙
@smlanka4u:
Punarjanam (Rebirth) is called Punarbhava (re-becoming) in Buddhism. If people believe rebirth/re-becoming correctly, then they stop sacrificing living beings for their Gods.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adipurush review: The good, the bad, the ugly
@smlanka4u:
Bodhisathva Rama was a non-violent previous life of the Buddha. Hindus modified it and made Ramayana. Also, they have tried to insult the Bhikkhus who beg for foods.
@Dante-cz2wt:
@smlanka4u new conspiracy theorist of neo-buddhists?
@smlanka4u:
@Dante-cz2wt, Most likely, Maurya empire made a lot of conspiracy theories to protect Brahamanism with the help of Jainism and modified stories. Magadha Kingdom changed a lot after 321 BCE. Brahamans tried to change and hide texts https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHnC9KAj4vI And they did a lot of things to develop Brahaman friendly religions.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Ancient Teachings Of Pure Land Buddhism https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpsJPpYCRfs
@smlanka4u:
Ultimate Dhamma is pure Abhidhamma, and it is better than the Pure Land concept. It is the most profound knowledge about the nature of existence.
@user-wu8vo9rt4r:
Stop with your navayana buddhism. It is not buddhism but a dalit political movement
@smlanka4u:
@user-wu8vo9rt4r, Mahayana Buddhism was a result of the influence of Brahamanism which happened after 300 BCE with the help of Brahaman Chanakya's invation of the Magadha Kingdom. They developed Brahaman friendly religions like Jainism, Hinduism, and Mahayana to help them survive.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Theravada vs Mahayana
smlanka4u:
Well Explained. 🙏 Sadhu 🙏 Sadhu 🙏 Sadhu
@Buddhist_Philosopher:
Why do you celebrate something so pernicious as sectarism?
@smlanka4u:
@Buddhist_Philosopher, Brahamanism influenced or developed Mahayana tradition with the help of Chandraguptha Maurya's invation of the Buddhist Magadha Kingdom with the help of Brahaman Chanakya. Therefore, we should know the difference between them.
@Buddhist_Philosopher:
@smlanka4u The Tantras are esoteric transmissions in visions from the Buddhas to the Mahasiddhas of India. Although it has Hindu elements. We should know differences but maintining an open mind.
@smlanka4u:
@Buddhist_Philosopher, They have tried to recommend themselves by using the word Maha (Great) to mention the developers of the Mahayana tradition and Mahayana. It is an indication of their ego. And Brahaman's caste system depends on ego too. Also, some societies try to use tricks like that to make them more superior than others. Ego divides people like that, and prevents seeing the truth clearly. The ultimate truths and their processes mentioned in Theravada Abhidhamma are very important to understand the nature of reality as it is, without depending on beliefs. Best of luck. Bye.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Convergence of Western Psychotherapy & Original Buddhism | Dr. Beth Jacobs
පක්ෂපාතී සම්මුතිමය විද්යාවට අභියෝගයක් -- A challenge for the biased conventional science
What is a Jhana? Commentaries vs Suttas - Meaning?
Bhante V has Passed Away. Delson will remember his life and reveal some amazing stories!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Right Knowledge, Right Liberation Workshop I - Part 2 | Ajahn Brahmali & Ven Sunyo | 8th July 2023:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wj6uWXIM75I
@smlanka4u:
Sadhu Sadhu Sadhu. Prathyaweksha Citta-Viti (Reflectional/Realizational/Reviewing mind-stream) helps to contemplate the experience in Jhana states, and they arise soon after disappearing the Jnana states according to Abhidhamma. 🧡🙏🙏🙏🧡
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
මං පොර ජාතකය - අධ්යාත්මික යාත්රා ZOOM සදහම් කඳවුර 02
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijIWqHIuusw
@smlanka4u:
Financial problems can cause mental problems frequently for most people, and also make people physically suffer sometimes. Also, some decisions of others can cause problems to us. We can't ignore that truth. But we can try to develop egolessness to be a good person while trying to survive or protect others during difficult times even if it is difficult to remove egolessness to be humble and tolerable. Sometimes, ego prevents us asking for help from good friends. If we want to walk on the spiritual path easily, then we have to get support from good friends. The spiritual path depends on good friends. May you attain the supreme bliss of nibbana. 🙏
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hinduism and Buddhism Explained | What is the difference between Hinduism and Buddhism?
@airplayrule:
Buddhism, like all knowledge, is actually a branch of the Vedas (what u incorrectly call "Hinduism" n incorrectly claim teaches a birth based caste system when it never mentioned that system except when it correctly predicted society would fall into it). Thus, other than Buddhism not mentioning a creator or permanence, all Buddhist teachings I ever read, are the same as the Vedic.
Buddha did talk about Demigods of the Vedas (AKA Angels), heaven, n hell. However, in 5th Veda it correctly predicted God would incarnate to help animals and, "...appear as Lord Buddha, the son of Añjanā, in the province of Gayā, just for the purpose of deluding those who are envious of the faithful theist."
4,000 years? The Vedas were composed OVER 5,000 years ago, but were taught through word of mouth BEFORE that, for countless millennia (to societies that were more advanced than us). Vedas have a history of 4.3 billion Earth years, which they teach is 1 day on a top planet in the universe. Check out those roughly 10,000 year old cities found miles from India in the Ocean (reported by sources like the BBC).
Over 5,000 years ago there was a great war involving the powerful rulers of Earth, with the victor becoming basically the Emperor of Earth. The Vedas were the source of the people’s spirituality/schools, politics, farming etc. All math, major sciences, the oldest, most accurate history, predictions that have come true (like of God’s great flood) or are coming or will come true etc. were originally stated in the Vedas. People who followed the Vedas were called Arya (sometimes with "n" at the end) which means noble in the sense of following the Vedas. The "Arya Invasion theory" is faulty speculation.
The Vedas warned that the % of people who follow the Vedas, truth, goodness, marriage vows, compassion for animals, etc. decline starting 5,000 years ago, with explanations on why it’d happened (but with a rare golden age that can happen possibly within our lifetime). The Earth's exact measurement as a globe, its 7 continents, Jesus Christ etc. were 1st mentioned in Vedas (e.g. 5th Veda: specifically, the Puranas). Distant planets, Relativity, & the most detailed, accurate, advanced models of creation, evolution, all originated from Vedas.
Click the sub, bell icons on youtuber "Playitalready" for upcoming vids with more detail, sources, evidence, insight, n fun. For now, watch his old, ok vids.
@smlanka4u:
Modern Hinduism is a later development. Mahabarat, Bhagawath Githa, Valmiki's Ramayana are not older than Buddhissm. Brahamanism developed modern Hinduism to challenge Buddhism and survive. Brahamin Chanakaya captured Magadha kindom, and Killed Buddhist kings, and they tried to change the history.
@airplayrule:
@smlanka4u I'm confused why u ignored everything i said, including facts i touched upon, like how i cited a city mentioned in the Vedas that even the BBC said was recently found n dated as over 10,000 years old, n how i quoted 5th Veda (which Gita n Mahabharata are part of) that correctly predicted Buddha, n how i offer more evidence, etc. n instead,
u just make up stuff which, even if some of it is true, u offer 0 proof for?
did u read my 1st comment? what if everything in it is true?
@smlanka4u:
@airplayrule, Most Hindu texts and Vedas developed from time to time, and there are many versions of them. Modern oral and written Sanskrit is not older than 500 BCE. And a lot of new Hindu texts were written in modern Sanskrit. Most probably, both modern Sanskrit and Pali derived from Prakrit after 500 BCE. Mahabharat and some Puranas contain modified and mythical stories. Probably, some historical texts were written to change the time and place of the original stories. They have tried to hide the details about Uggresena and Padmananda. Likely, Alexander tried to capture Uggresena's Kingdom, and Padmananda came from Magadha to help Uggresena to stop Alexander. But according to Mahabharat, Uggresena lived in 10th or 12th century BCE, and it and other texts mentioned many other Uggresenas. Likely, they wanted to hide the original Uggresena. Brahaman history writers have tried to Brainwash people to make them forget the real Uggresena who lived in 320 BCE. Also, they have changed the details of the Padmananda, and they tried to say that he killed a lot of Kshathriyas. But most likely, he was the Porus mentioned in Greek texts, and he was a son of a Kshathriya king. Likely, a lot of people knew that someone called Parushuram killed a lot of Kshathriyas. But Puranas tried to say that Maha-Padmananda was Parushuram. Puranas are not much old texts, and those texts have tried to change the charactor of Parushuram by making a mythological story about an Avatar called Parushuram who kills a lot of generations of Kshathriyas. Also, they have tried to convert Siddhartha Gauthama into an Avatar fo Vishnu. Mahabharat and some texts like that have been used to brainwash people and protect Brahamanism while trying to teach modified stories using the Brahamanical educational system called Hinduism. Just like the western educational systems are trying to hide the truth and brainwash people to protect their A-Brahamic blind faith and modern slavery. Their blind faith is more important to them than moral and spiritual develoment.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Faith Healer's Favorite Scam
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How Hinduism made Christopher Nolan a legend ?: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VG2hqzoPWes
@Bageshwarwale12:
Proud To Be Sanatani 🚩
@smlanka4u:
A violent religion. Western and Hindu religious texts contain a lot of violence.
@savagecomedians6750:
@smlanka4u ohh Yeah , and muslims are peaceful , love ur humour bro
@chuladevdhurua6135:
@smlanka4u worldwide knows.. 😂violent religion is islaam
@smlanka4u:
@savagecomedians6750 , Abrahamic religions and Brahamic religions were violent. It is the history of them. I'm a Buddhist.
@Arvind637:
@smlanka4u if We were violent.no another religion can be here 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@smlanka4u:
@Arvind637, Brahaman Chanakya and Chandraguptha Maurya took the Magadha kingdom while Padmananda and Uggresena was trying protect the borders. Probably, Buddhism lost support from Magadha after that. But likely, they supported Jainism and Brahamanical system to survive against the growth of Buddhism. Mahayana Buddhism and modern Hinduism developed after that. But it is not the problem. They have tried to change the History too. Uggresena helped Padmananda to remove Kalashoka and his son Nandiwardhana (Mahanandin) from Magadha kindom, and he married Padmananda's daughter. But a Purana text try to say that Nandiwardhana was not Mahanandin. Likely, they changed Padmananda into Mahapadmananda. Purana texts and some other texts have been used to hide the history. There is no magor person called Malayakethu in those texts, but indian dramas mention him without mentioning Uggresena. Also, some texts tried to say Uggresena was another name for Padmananda. Likely, they had a lot of things to hide. Therefore, their texts are not much reliable.
@MrPoornakumar:
Buddhism met its doom in Maurya Emperor (Chandra Gupta Maurya's grandson's grandson), Brhad'ratha's reign & time. By then the Vaidiki Brahmans were out of work (now, they have work full) with no patrons. They hatched a plan to end Buddhism & to bring back Vaidikism (what popularly called Hinduism now) The King's commander-in-chief, Pushyamitra Sunga, was roped in because of his Brahmanic sympathies. When the king was reviewing a parade, the C-in-C got him killed with a sword (no pistols then). Pushyamitra Sunga anointed himself as the King and started the Sunga dynasty. Systematically the Buddhists were hunted down. Hinduism grew in stature & royal patronage till in Gupta dynasty, it was shining the brightest. Country-wide presence of Buddhists dwindled in numbers, which were severely down. Theys became Social pariahs, denied entry within city walls, eking out sustenance outside, by doing scavenging in the city & subsisting on the city left-overs like dead cattle & skinning them to make foot-wear.
@smlanka4u:
@MrPoornakumar, Thank you for the information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alexander vs Porus | Truth Uncovered | We have fooled for centuries | Keerthi History
@smlanka4u:
Maha-Padmananda was Porus. Likely, Maurya empire tried to hide details about Padmananda and Uggresena.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
These are the one's who discovered America
And should be taught in our history books
Not the false storyline they give about Columbus discovery America
“The Top 10 Reasons”: How Buddhist Bengal Became Muslim Bangladesh (Part 2)
Exhibition Tour—Tree & Serpent: Early Buddhist Art in India, 200 BCE–400 CE | Met Exhibitions
Emergence of Psychology : Buddhism, UGC NET/JRF, SET, CUET, GATE, PHD Entrance Exam
Yasir Qadhi's Shocking Revelation About The Spread Of Islam
@smlanka4u:
The history must not be changed even if it is a bad history. But we are not our history, and we can try to fix us.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monk Chat
@smlanka4u:
Prithi (the mental factoy called happiness) is something we can make for free, and use it to remove the pain that caused by anger and sadness (sadness is a reaction of anger). Ven. Ajahn Brahm said that he tried to smile every morning to be happy. Also, we can have a desire (Chanda) to be happy (Prithi), but desire must not be associated with attachment (Raaga) if we have a desire to remove greed (greed). Desire is like a choice. The cause of suffering is greed (desired-attachment), not the pure desire. Also, the body can make an affection or a good feeling without a support from desire. The Buddha said that he felt good when he knew that the wind he felt was caming from the city he lived. 🙏🙏🙏
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SRI LANKA | Hidden Caves In Ritigala Forest Monastery Revealed | Sri Lanka Vlog 🇱🇰: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gHxDUl3kCJw
@smlanka4u:
The Buddha's language was not Pali, it was Magadhi Prakrit.
@toohappytobehomesick:
Thanks for the info💞
@smlanka4u:
Pali and Sanskrit languages were derived from Prakrit, and they were not spoken languages.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Early Buddhist Philosophy of Mind
@smlanka4u:
Thank you. Probably, a Citta/mind arises during an existing moment of a matter unit while producing Cittaja Rupa (mindly matter), depending on the formations of the material unit called Rupa Kalapa/Zone. And then, the vanishing moment of a matter unit would host the existing moment of the Citta/mind moment. The existing moment of the Citta/mind is not material, and it belongs to the immaterial category called Nama/Name. The Citta vanishes during the next arising moment of the matter unit. The next arising moment of the Citta/mind can happen during the existing moment of the same matter unit until the Citta/mind arises on another matter unit during its fist existing moment. The previous Citta/mind moment could vanish during the arising moment of the new matter unit. I explained it based on Tripitaka and its commentaries.
@DougsDharma:
Yes perhaps so, in this video I'm discussing early Buddhism via the suttas rather than the later abhidhamma method.
@smlanka4u:
@DougsDharma, There are no texts of early Buddhism without abhidhamma. It says, Abhidhamma was in Suttas.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MUSLIMS ARE ATTACKING CHRISTIANS IN PAKISTAN
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sigiriya - Ancient Sky City Built With Advanced Technology
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XlE0i06i0w8
@rathy_v:
@smlanka4u if is myth why Rama sethu Bridge,? why Ashoga vanam,? why you have temple for Nuwarelia for setha and Rama, ?
Ravanan cave, Ravanan Ellai, so on
Accept the truth. Kasiyappa may shelter at the bottom some times before killed. How kasiyappa built the palace in the top of the hill where is the bridge?
@smlanka4u:
@rathy_v , A lot of indian Tamils live in Nuwara Eliya, Also, hindus invaded Sri lanka, and they worshiped Hindu Gods in Sri Lanka. Rama was a Buddhist Bodhisathwa, and Sitha was his sister according to the original Jataka tale 461. The geographical bridge between Sri Lanka and India is a natural land. People could use it or develop it easily without a big effort. Ravana was a king in Sri Lanka during the time of the Buddha according to the Lankavathara Sutta (but it is not a reliable sutta). Hanuman or his monekies were not early humans, and the Vamiki's Ramayana mentions a story around 7000 years old. Humans lived from more than 200000 years. And the Rama in the Buddhist story most likely lived in a higher human realm or a very long time ago. And he was not an Avatar. But some texts of Hinduism have tried to change or make the history India with a lot of new mythological tales. It seems that they wanted to brainwash people, and convert people into the Brahamanical system. Sometimes, politicians try to protect their political power with the help of educational and religious texts. They change and add texts to protect their power. Indians are trapped into a lot of texts like that.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ashoka the Great - The Buddist Expansion #3 - Extra History
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpv6ZsXR1aA
@smlanka4u:
Chandraguptha Maurya (Ashoka's grandfather) invaded Magadha Kindom and killed Buddhist kings (Padmananda/Porus, Dhana Nanda).
@user-kd4nd4zq8x:
@smlanka4u And since this is very ancient history there r various theories bout Dhananandas death. First one says Dhanananda was assassinated by Kautilya and Chandragupta Mauryas men secretly. Second says he was forgiven and spent the rest of his life in the forest where he died.
@smlanka4u:
@user-kd4nd4zq8x, Greek sources mentioned that Alexander the great was attacking Porus and Nanda kindom. Therefore, Porus was the great-Padmananda. But the Purana texts in India have tried to convert Maha-padmananda into a vilan. Ugrasena was the fist Nanda king according to Buddhist sources, and he removed Kalashoka and his son from Magadha. Ugrasena was not another name for Padmananda. He was Padmananda's nephew.
@user-kd4nd4zq8x:
@smlanka4u So yeah broda I was trying to reply to u but Idk y wasn't it going. So--- According to Diodorus, Porus told Alexander that the contemporary Nanda king was a man of "worthless character", and was not respected by his subjects as he was thought to be of low origin. This states Porus and Padmananda r different. And if we consider Porus to be Padmananda then y would he speak ill of his son? And Padmananda never conquered the Punjab region which Porus ruled. Now, yeah Padmananda is India's one of the first empire builders and let me say, Emperor Kalashoka of Shishunaga dynasty of Magadha wasn't his dynasty's last ruler, he was the second ruler and perhaps the last powerful monarch of his dynasty who is credited with arranging the second Buddhist Council. Mahapadmin was the dynasty's last ruler whom Mahapadma overthrew. Buddhist text don't even mention Mahapadma Nanda, it suggests that a robber turned king Ugrasen took the throne and was succeeded by his brother Dhanananda. It's the puraanas that mentions him and his great conquest. U just can't classify anyone good or bad here as History is complex. In the great epics of Ramayana and Mahabharata we also got to know about the good sides of Raavana and Kauravas respectively. And even Gr8 Ashoka committed crimes against the Jains after becoming a pacifist as stated in the Ashokavadana. But u just can't classify him as evil coz of his good deeds. And this is the complexity, not any war between good and evil as in fantasy films.
@smlanka4u:
@user-kd4nd4zq8x, The first Nanda king Ugrasena was not a son of a king, and he was a thief according to buddhist sources. So, Porus (Padmananda) could tell bad things about his nephew Ugrasena. It matches the context. The name Porus was not an Indian name. There are no texts to prove that Dhana Nanda was from a low origin. Dhana Nanda gave alms. But according to texts, he increaed taxes. There were people with the name Ugrasena in Agra (near Panjab), and Ugrasena could come from there. Greek sources clearly mentioned that they were attacking Nanda kings. Nandiwardhana was the son of Kalashoka. And he or another son called Mahanandin was the last Shaishunaga king. But it doesn't mean that Kalashoka was dead at that time. Ugrasena took the Magadha kingdom from them. Mahanandin was the father of Mahapadmananda. We can say that Ugrasena could legally become the fist Nanda king because he was Padmanandha's nephew even if he was not a son of a king. There were nine Nanda kings according to the texts.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Three Vehicles (Triyāna) in Buddhism
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJqM2d8NlXo
@smlanka4u:
Brahamanas or their supporters could develop the Mahayana teachings against the Theravada teachings after the death of the early Buddhist kings in India. And it is very clear that Mahayana teachings were intentionally developed to attack the Theravada teachings.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How Can SPACE and TIME be part of the SAME THING?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wbd1-lFkKQ4
@dougg1075:
Time adjusts itself for each person to make sure light speed is the same for each person/observer ( whatever that is). Crazy
@smlanka4u:
Einstein's relativity didn't prove that time is relative. Relative time is only a principle in it.
@gaopinghu7332:
@smlanka4u you are right. There have been, however, experiments that proved it.
@smlanka4u:
@gaopinghu7332, High-energy muons decay slowly because they are not similar to the low-energy muons. It doesn't mean that speed changes the time. Also, photons experience time even if they don't decay faster, and their wavelenth increases with time. Planck time is not relative.
@gaopinghu7332:
@smlanka4u you didn't even ask me which proof I was talking about. That doesn't seem very right.
The very existence of black holes (and particularly the event horizon) proves it, by the way.
@smlanka4u:
@gaopinghu7332, Speed has nothing to do with the absolute time. Time-dialation is an illusion that depends on the decaying process and the density of the medium.
@gaopinghu7332:
@smlanka4u Uhhh, you haven't done anything to disprove my argument. That doesn't seem very, well, professional, does it?
@smlanka4u:
@gaopinghu7332 , The high-density space near Black Holes can slow down the speed of light. The strong gravitational force can prevent escaping light from Black Holes. Also, light slows down in water and other high-density mediums. But it is not a time-dialation.
@gaopinghu7332:
@smlanka4u really? How so? From what I've heard, as objects approach the event horizon they become slower. Why is time dilation not real?
@smlanka4u:
Gaoping Hu, The density of space is not consistent everywhere. Also, the clocks slow down due to the changes in clocks (mass, specific charge) with their speeds. Therefore, time-dialation is only an illusion.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Origins of the Buddhist Doctrine of Momentariness: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSRp6WHGdjk
@smlanka4u:
The state of mind continues without a break during the moments of Jnana. The mind moment with Jhana contains the mental factor (Cetacika) called Prithi (Happiness). The mind stream (Citta Viti) can continue more than 17 mind moments during Jhana states. The Buddha taught the process of the mind and matter series to the living beings in heaven, and also to Ven. Sariputta Thero. Only a Buddha could teach that profound science. It is a challenge to the conventional science. Mahayana Abhidharma Kosha was written by a Theravada scholar according to Mahayana. Seemingly, the early developers of the Mahayana didn't want to include the Abhidharma into their Doctrine. Abhidharma could be the biggest challenge to the Brahamanism. Therefore, some people could develop the Mahayana to reduce the power of the original Theravada Doctrine and its commentaries. And we can easily understand why a western scholar would reject the Abhidharma doctrine. There are a lot of jealous people in this world.
@Giantcrabz:
It's kinda not tho. There is no evidence whatsoever for supernatural beings
@smlanka4u:
@Giantcrabz, Supernatural beings would come to the Human realm. But likely, we are living in the Animal realm. There are 4 types of Humans in 4 types of continents. Likely, there are Humans in Pretha and Asura realms too.
@codecixteen:
@smlanka4u prove it.
@smlanka4u:
@codecixteen, A research is going on called Binary Physics and Buddhism. It is a mathematical proof.
@codecixteen:
@smlanka4u I'll read about this, thank you. 🙏
@smlanka4u:
@codecixteen, You are welcome.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are Brahmins & Hindus being targeted by Western World | Koenraad Elst https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKJ-uaOnStM
@smlanka4u:
Brahmin Chanakya and Chandraguptha Maurya removed Buddhist kings in Magadha, causing to decline Buddhism in Magadha.
@Parmeshwariparmeshwari-yo2lb:
😂😂😂nanda buddhist the?? Ye hi knowledge hota hai nav boddho me😂
@smlanka4u:
@Parmeshwariparmeshwari-yo2lb, Maha-Padma Nanda's grandfather King Kalashoka sponsored the 2nd Buddhist council, and his son Dhana Nanda participated in an alms giving function. Shaishunaga and Nanda dynasties were affiliated with Buddhism. Brahmin Chanakya's invaded Magadha, and sponsored the 1st Jain council. Probably, the name Mahavira was a name for the Siddhartha Gauthama Bodhisathva. But likely, Jains took it and some stories from Buddhism. Also a lot of Hindu texts developed after that to make a fake history and hide the history.
@Parmeshwariparmeshwari-yo2lb:
@smlanka4u nav boddh duniya ke sare historian mante hai ki nanda Dynasty jain thi aur jainism me bhi buddh bola gaya hai mahaveer ko toh copy paste to mujhe buddhism lagta hai jainism ka.. Jaisi mahaveer jain ki life story hai waise hi gautam buddha ki bhi hai... Historian Parswanath ko historical mante hai jo ki mahaveer jain se pehle ke hai par historian gautam buddha se pehle kisi aur buddh ko nahi mante.. Jainism me haryak vansh ko jain kaha gaya hai aur buddhism me boddh toh hum jains ki history kyun na mane?? Jo ki buddhism se pehle ka hai.. Bodhisatva ka concept mahayani boddho ka hai na ki theravada ka.. Indica me toh aap logo ke buddha ka koi Evidence nahi milta par hindu text baad me developed huye?? 🤣🤣
@smlanka4u:
@Parmeshwariparmeshwari-yo2lb, The founder of Jainism was Niganta Natha Putta, and the name Mahavira had not used in Buddhist sourses to mention him. Early Buddhist didn't make statues of the Buddha, so they could use the statues of the Siddhartha Gauthama Bodhistathwa to respect the Buddha. There were a lot of names for him. Purana texts would have tried to convert the Nanda dynasty in to a Jain dynasty. But the original Nanda dynasty was belong to Maha-Padma Nanda and his nephew, and the meaning of that name sounds like 'Great-Lotus Happiness'. It is a Buddhist name.
@Parmeshwariparmeshwari-yo2lb:
@smlanka4u founder of Jainism rishabh nath hai nav boddh,history ka agar kuch pata nahi toh pehle pad ke aao..jainism ki history jaanane ke liye hume buddhist Scripture ki zarurat nahi..Mahaveer jain aur gautan buddha ki life story maximum ek jaise milti hai aur historian mahaveer jain ko buddha se pehle ka batate hai iska matlab boddho ne jaino ki copy ki hai. Nanda Dynasty ko historian jain batate hai toh ab nav boddh apni jholachhap history ko neo buddhist jholachhap channel pe hi bola kare yaha nahi.
@smlanka4u:
@Parmeshwariparmeshwari-yo2lb, Mythological stories can't make the founder of Jainism, and those stories don't represent a reliable history. Also, the Gauthama Buddha is the founder of Buddhism even if there were many Buddhas according to Buddhism. Unverifiable stories are not enough to believe what really happened. Just wake up and come to the reality first. And use your brain very well when you depend on unbelievable stories.
@Parmeshwariparmeshwari-yo2lb:
@smlanka4u Mythological stories toh buddhism me bhi hai, ashok se pehle gautam buddha ka Archaeological Evidence de nahi pate nav boddh.. ASI ne RTI me khud bataya hai ki unkr pass gautam buddha ka koi Evidence nahi aur na indica me hi hume buddha ka koi Evidence milta hai.. Historian hi jainism ko buddhism se old mante hai mai toh jaino ke dave ki bhi baat nahi karti..
@smlanka4u:
@Parmeshwariparmeshwari-yo2lb, There are a lot of archeological evidences and relations to Buddhism in India. Kings Ajasathru and Kalashoka lived before Ashoka, and they sponsored the Buddhist councils before Ashoka. You can't even find good archeological evidences for Hinduism before 3rd century BC. Hinduism is better than Brahamanism, but it helps to survive Brahamanism. There are no evidence for a religion called Hinduism or Sanathana Dharm in early India. Buddhism was the Sanathana Dhamma in early India. A lot of museums in a lot of countries have evidence for Buddhism. Also, there are monuments of Yashodhara and Mahamaya Devi, and relics of Arhats.
@Parmeshwariparmeshwari-yo2lb:
buddhism yani kshtriya buddha dharm ke jo bhi Evidence milte hai wo Sare ashok ke baad milte hai yaha tak ki buddha ki pehli murti hi kanishk ke period me bani hai,haryak vansh, ajatshatru etc ye Sare buddhist Scripture me likhe hai inka koi Archaeological Evidence nahi milte na hi inki koi Manuscript milti hai aur ashok se pehle hindus ke kayi Evidence milte hai toh ye neo buddhist channel ki gappe wahi mara karo😆b b lal Archaeologist bhi apni book me likhte hai ki ashok se pehle buddha ka koi Evidence nahi milta ye tark wo krishna ke Evidence milne pe likhte hai..
@smlanka4u:
@Parmeshwariparmeshwari-yo2lb, The excavated Mayadevi's shrine is older than 3rd century BC. Also, there are Stupas with a lot of older relics, and we can investigate the history of them if we want. It was a very good preservation that helped to protect them even after the raise of the Brahamanical power before and after the period of Ashoka. If you are a Brahamin, then I can easily understand why you are trying to make fake arguments. It is better if you can convert into the lowest caste in India first before you trying to protect the Brahamanical caste system. Still, a lot of Indians follow the caste system. And some Indians try tell western people that Hinduism is better than Buddhism when westerners are searching about Buddhism. And some westerners likely think that Buddhism is like Hinduism. It is a big problem for the groth of Buddhism because Hinduism is like another belief system with a lot of violent Gods. And some modern westerners don't like belief systems and violent Gods. Some Indians try to say that a lot of mythological stories are wrong, and they think that Buddhism is a part of them. But likely, a lot of Hindu texts were developed later with a lot of illogical stories. Also, those texts have tried to change Buddhism. And some Hindus caused the declining of Buddhism in India. And they used violence too.
@Parmeshwariparmeshwari-yo2lb:
@smlanka4u who said i am brahmin?? 🤣🤣neo buddhist ko har koi brahmin hi lagta hai🤣🤣mai kshyriya hu,waise bhi kshtriya buddha dharm ke 28 buddha maximum brahmin aur kshtriya hi rahe hai.. Buddha ne shudro aur female ko buddha banane ka right bhi nahi diya hai tripitak me aur maya devi me jo Excavation hua hai waha se ek wood Structure mila hai jaha pe ped, paudhe bane huye hai aur historian ke according wo kisi nature Worshippers ka place tha toh pehle wo puri report pad ke aao..ASI faje hai??B B Lal Archaeologist fake hai??🤣🤣Ashok se pehle buddhism ka kuch nahi milta..
@smlanka4u:
@Parmeshwariparmeshwari-yo2lb, A Hindu Brahamin or a Kshathriya would love to defend Brahamanism because they are belong to a higher caste. The Buddha selects a Brahamin or a Kshathriya caste because the society requires it. Also, the early Brahamins didn't teach Vedas to low caste people. And women had difficulties and less power in early India. A Buddha is a fortunate (Bhagyawan) person, and he can't give people reasons to blame him because the Buddha already had a lot of challenges. Mahamaya devi's tempe itself is an evidence for the existence of her, and don't expect to see her photo in it. Early Maurya empire could support Jainism and Brahamanism against Buddhism because Brahamins would not like a Buddhist to be a king again. But Maurya king Ashoka converted to Buddhism, and he sponsored Buddhism and helped to re-establish the original Buddhism from 18 different sects of Buddhism at that time. Also, he made larger Stupas on top of the existing Stupas, and westernes took some of them and stored them in museums. Also, the relics found in Kapilawasthu were brought to Sri Lanka. The details about Jainism and Brahamanical system mentioned in early Buddhism show how old the Buddhism was even if a big tragedy have destroyed records of early Magadha. Indians don't really know who the Indian ruler Porus really was. A big tragedy has happened to the Indian history after 321 BCE.
@Parmeshwariparmeshwari-yo2lb:
@smlanka4u neo buddhist gappe marne ke siway kuch nahi karte😆vedo ke kayi mantro ko toh female scholars ne composed kiya hai jaise Lopmudra, apala, ghosha, Maitreyi etc etc aur female brahamavadini bhi banti thi, google kar lena agar na pata ho.. Hinduism me female Goddess ko puja jata hai toh isi se sabit hota hai ki kaun sa religion female ki respect karta tha aur buddhism me 28 buddha me ek bhi female buddha nahi hai aur baad me jo Goddess bhi hai tara etc wo mahayana sect ki hai theravada ki nahi jo main buddhism hai. . Buddha ne shudra aur female pe fatwa diya tha ki wo buddha nahi ban sakti...buddhist Scripture me female ke liye bahut bura bura likha hai.. Koi agar buddhist Scripture padne lage tab pata chalega ye..buddha ka koi Evidence nahi milta ise Archaeologist kehte hai aur temple ka naam toh baad me bhi rakha ja sakta hai.. Tripitak me brahmin jo ki dusre varno se shadi karte the unhe dog se compare kiya hai toh socho buddhist kitni Equality me believe karte the...
puri maurya Dynasty khud buddhist nahi thi.. Chandragupta maurya nahi the, unke bete bindusar ajivak the, ashok buddhist tha fir uska ek beta jalok shaivite the, ashok ka pota sampriti jain tha, dashrath ne bhi caves ajivak ko donate ki thi last king Brahdrath buddhist tha shayad.
@smlanka4u:
@Parmeshwariparmeshwari-yo2lb, Ok, I can accept that Bramins allowed women to read Vedas. But I have seen a lot of questions about it. Likely, it is a fake argument which was developed by Brahamins themselves to make them easy to ignore the same question regarding low caste people. Brahamins have used a lot of tricks like that to change perception of people just like the tricks that western scientific community try to use to hide real questions. Don't think that the highest Hindu gods are genderless. The main three higher Gods are males. Women are less intelligent according to Vedas. And they had to sacrifice their life sometimes to respect his Brahamin husband. And Krisha had a lot of women.
Only a follower of a Brahamanical religion could become the King in Magadha. And Ashoka was not a Buddhist until he meets a fully enlightened Arhat Buddhist Thero after the war in Kalinga. Brahamana Chanakya helped Ashoka to become a King too. And he was Ashoka's advisor until his death, and that could be a reason for him to be violent in his early years. Chanda (Violent) Ashoka became a Dharma Ashok with the help of that Buddhist Thero (Moggaliputta Tissa Thero).
@harvy345:
@smlanka4u a budhhist cry too loud on internet that how hindu and Jain have copied them. But when it comes to implementing their value in real life, I show only Jain and Hindus trying it. If I'm not wrong all of them promote vegetarianism then why do most of the budhhist countries non-vegetarian? Even South Indian and East Indians have the highest percentage of non-vegetarians while they are the ones who follow Buddhism. I have seen lots of Buddhist making fun of Hindus for their vegitarian diet.and some of them are openly supporting idea of Hindu Genocide.
You know why, because most of them seeks validation not dharmik knowledge .cause if they really want knowledge they should have followed " eightfold paths " not some politician.
Secondly there is a common law of justification that you should read at least something about that person whom you are judging ,I am not making any comment on Budhha because I haven't read about him but how come you and some of new so called budhhist making comment on Jain and Hindu without reading their scriptures (on your own , I repeat on your own not listening from some political influenced person)
@smlanka4u:
@harvy345, Christians, Muslims, Ex-Hindus, Hindus and Non-religious people live in Buddhist countries and they don't usually follow the five precepts in Buddhism. Sometimes, they try to influence Buddhists to break the five precepts. Buddhism doesn't try to make rules to control people because Buddhism depends on people. Dr. Ambedkar's movie shows that how Hindus have treated the low caste people like slaves and animals. Not eating meet was a rule of Devadatta which he tried to use to show that he is greater than the Buddha. But the Buddha couldn't accept that rule because it was not practical, and he followed the middle way. But Buddhist monks should verify that no one kill animals for them to eat. King Ashoka prohibited Killing some animals. Some Buddhist countries have prohibited killing animals. The Path of liberation has nothing to do with the foods we eat if we don't have bad intentions. A lot of Hindu Pujas and rituals are like cravings and beliefs. A lot of Hindus don't know whether Hinduism is scientific or not because they have a lot of unscientific gods. It is a confusionism.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How Mike Quit Alcohol Using Buddhism
Buddhist Rebirth as Symbol and Metaphor
Historical Taxila museum | history of buddhism | #rajpootzadaofficial
LIVE280 | Bharat Se Buddhism Ka Ant Kyo Aur Kaise Hua? | The Realist Azad
Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar (2000) 4K Full Movie (Hindi)
Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar full movie english
Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar (2000) 4K Full Movie (Tamil)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Did Stephen Hawking Use God to Sell More Books?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEzwf_HJ4Dc
@smlanka4u:
Stephen Hawking did his best to validate the Big Bang theory to support creationism, without asking real questions. Obviously, a lot of scientists pretend that they don't support creationism while trying to prove it.
@rogerphelps9939:
You are deluded.
@smlanka4u:
@rogerphelps9939, Black Holes grow with or without absorbing ordinary matter. If the Black Holes stop absorbing Dark Matter or something, then the expansion can stop because the expansion depends on Black Holes. Hawking radiation is a trick he used to support creationsim, saying that Black Holes decay, ending the universe. But Black can make the observable universe again with the help of gravity. Scientists think the expansion is a permanent thing. So, it is a their indirect support to creationism.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zazen and Dharma Talk with Ben Connelly: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-04MFOxHLo
@smlanka4u:
Dependent Origination is the only true nature. Imaginations and realizations depend on the ultimate-meaningful (Paramartha) realities of dependent origination (Paticca Samuppada). There is no absolute self that can imagin or realize independently. Feelings are not imaginations and realizations. Therefore, imaginations and realizations are conventional truths. The states of the mind cause the process of Karma to continue or stop rebirth. Original early Buddhist teachings are more accurate than later developed teachings. Early Mahayana teachings developed with the influence of a lot of Indian beliefs.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Practicing Mind: Developing Focus and Discipline in Your Life | Thomas M. Sterner
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Does the universe have a purpose? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgTiMEfWkHE
@smlanka4u:
Rebirth doesn't have a purpose. Rebirth is a cyclic process like the cyclic continuation of the universe.
@woodygilson3465:
@smlanka4u Point to a single thing observed in nature that dies and is reborn.
@smlanka4u:
@woodygilson3465, One thing becomes another thing like a rebirth. Your becoming (Bhavanga) process can make you a different type of living being in the next life. It is the process of rebirth. You don't become you again.
@woodygilson3465:
@smlanka4u Religious fantasy. Things don't magically become other things and "next lives" aren't real things at all.
@smlanka4u:
@woodygilson3465, The mind uses the brain and body to collect information from point to point and moment to moment. You think you are looking at the full picture. But in reality, the mind makes pictures from point to point instantly while predicting patterns. The mind is a process of measurement, and the mind can see and measure the very small light particles too. Therefore, the mind is like a nano observer/detector. Your body is not your mind, and the body is only a house of the mind. Perhaps, the missing right handed neutrinos had a potential to behave like observers. There is an observation and measurement process in quantum elements that collapses the wave function. A lot of reasons like that can cause the mind continue from one body to another, conserving the process of life like the conserving process of the amount of energy/matter in the universe.
@deker0954:
@smlanka4u I don't believe that but I'm not offended that you do. Your beliefs are your own and have no bearing on mine. People like to go to war over beliefs. I think that is evil.
@smlanka4u:
@deker0954, Yes, I can undertand. We don't want to believe or accept rebirth. But it's better to prepare for it if it is a natural process, without using our ego and ignorence to reject it. A lot of people don't even know that rebirth is a big possibility even if they know a lot of things about useless things.
@DistinctiveBlend:
@smlanka4u "We don't want to believe or accept rebirth"
Evidence, it's important. Otherwise what you're talking about is faith.. and that's fine, but I suggest most people here are happy to accept something once it can be proven.
@smlanka4u:
@DistinctiveBlend, The research papers on Near death experiences proved that the mind can move out from the body and see what happens, using the mind. Therefore, we can't believe that the mind can't survive without a body. Smoking cigarettes cause cancer even if it is not easy to see exactly how it happens. You can accept or reject proofs like that if you don't like to accept or reject. It depends on the level of your intelligence.
@smlanka4u:
@woodygilson3465, DNA is right-handed. So, a right-handed elementary particle could cause the formation of DNA.
@nanban1896:
@smlanka4u No, you go back to what you were before you were born, remember that? Its called nothing.
@smlanka4u:
@nanban1896, Please let us know how you felt when you were less than 1 year old.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Channel 4 film mostly an anti-Rajapaksa tirade aimed at blackening the Rajapaksa legacy - Gotabaya
@smlanka4u:
Some creationists are afraid to Sri Lanka a lot because of the power of Theravada Buddhist Foundation in Sri Lanka. They use lies, violence, alcohol/wine, and a lot of unethical businesses to make people blind to promote their blind faith, and they try to insult Sinhalese leaders to brainwash people to reduce the Buddhist power in Sri Lanka.
SJL326 | Punjab हज़ार साल पहले Buddhist देश था। Untold History of Punjab | Science Journey
Buddhist Monk: Why You Feel Lost In Life & How To Reinvent Yourself | Gelong Thubten
The ancient Buddhism in India #Buddha #Buddhism #india
Glimpses of Abhidharma, 11-13 February 2023, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India - Part 1
Dhamma talk on Abhidhamma as a part of The Path to Freedom
Full details about Buddhism
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Buddhist convert Regrets Calling CP After Trying to Convert Christian Prince to Buddhism #buddhism:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyLzBZF00p4
@smlanka4u:
Virtue is a core teaching of Buddhism that includes non-violence and mindfulness. Not killing any living being is a part of the five Buddhist precepts. Wisdom comes from mindfulness and investigating the nature of reality. We get results for our actions on the natural process of the nature. Therefore, no one can make or remove the rules in nature. Delusion/ego, Greed, and Anger are the root causes of our existence.
@Christ-ow8jz:
God is Good and he's Jesus Christ ✝️
@smlanka4u:
No. Jesus was a human and he died on some reasons, and Romans made the Roman Catholicism using his name on some reasons. No one is better than a Buddha because he knows everything and he had all the great mental qualities. Also, he has explained the process of the mind (the mind moment and 52 emotions) and matter (28 Rupa) better than anyone else. His knowledge helped me to develop a theory to explain the process of quantum objects and the mind.
@YOLO14344:
@smlanka4u who has seen budha your god?
@smlanka4u:
@YOLO14344, The mind depends on natural causes, and it is the real creator of life. You will never find a creator God outside the mind. The mind uses good and bad qualities of the nature. The Buddha said us to practice the mind to use only the good qualities of the nature to free the mind from the unhealthy nature. A purified mind stops continuing after death according to the nature of reality.
@YOLO14344:
@smlanka4u so if buddha is not god why are u fallowing him if he cant save your souls?
@smlanka4u:
@YOLO14344, No one can save you from the cycle of rebirth. You have to investigate the possible nature of rebirth first to understand the problem and find a solution. The Buddha explained the nature of rebirth and solutions to end rebirth.
@lelohadebe9122:
@smlanka4u will that take you to Heaven though? No
@smlanka4u:
@lelohadebe9122, There are 20 Brahma realms and 6 heavenly realms according to the Buddhist cosmology. The states of the mind and natural causes (Karma) send us good or bad world in the 31 planes of existence. Beliefs are not enough to have a good rebirth.
@YOLO14344:
@smlanka4u bwahaha🤣🤣🤣 why until now no one can prove this one if this true?🤣🤣🤣
@smlanka4u:
@YOLO14344, You can think like that if you want. Study about near death experiences and past life memories. You can't use telescopes to prove or disprove rebirth.
@YOLO14344:
@smlanka4u 🤣🤣🤣 funny but nope! i used a lot of telescope but i dont se rebirth there unles u use them in nude beach for spying birth canal🤣🤣🤣
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Heated Debate 🔥: Hinduism Vs Buddhism | नवबौद्ध का Challenge मुझ से लेलो बुद्ध के समकालीन प्रमाण:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZ_Hp8sbKiM
@smlanka4u:
Hinduism developed after Buddhism to challange Buddhism. Chanakya and Chandraguptha started to change history after their invation of Magadha Kindowm. They killed Buddhist Kings in Magadha while they were weak due to the Alexander's invation.
Buddhism declined after the invation of Chandragupta Maurya, and he sponsored the first Jain council. There are relics of the Kapilawastu. And there are a lot of relics of Buddhism in Stupas. King Ashoka made stupas on top of the existing stupas. Hinduism is the education system of Brahamins which they use to protect the caste system and their political power.
Brahamins made new hindu texts to protect their caste system and religious business. Maha-Padmanandda (Porus) was a Buddhist king in Magadha, and he died after the Brahamin Chanakya's invation. They developed Jainism and Hinduism against Buddhism and used the stories of Buddhism to make Buddhism weak.
The later developed Sanskrit scripts can't make Hinduism older than Buddhism. Vedic texts were the text of Brahamins, and they were written in early Sanskrit. Pali and Sanskrit developed later and Prakrit was the language of common people. Something very have happend to the people who spoke Prakrit, after 321 BCE.
@NishantKumar-ry9rp:
@smlanka4u Har linguist sanskrit ko lagbhag 5000 - 3500 warsa purana maanta hai par prakrit ya paali inn dono ki hi dating inti nahi jaati aur top 10 oldest languages me paali aur prakrit kahin dur dur Tak nahi hai 😂😂 aur rahi baat inscription ki toh sanskrit ka sabse purana inscription 200 BCE ka mil jata hai jo ashok ke inscriptions ke matra 60 warsa baad ka hai aur kewal inscriptions ke aadhar par kisi bhasa ki dating nahi hoti kyunki bahut saari bhasaye aisi hai jo hai toh bahut purani par uske inscriptions bahut baad me milte hai ya unki lipi bahut baad me develop hui hai aur bharat me toh ashok se pahle inscription likhwane ki parampara hi nahi thi aur indus valley civilisation me bhi kewal seals par hume uss samay ki lipi ka pata chalta hai aur woh bhi abhi decipher nahi hui hai. Tum log chahe jitna bhi jor laga lo lekin koi bhi scholar yeh kabhi manega hi nahi ki Sanskrit prakrit ke baad aayi aur Hinduism Buddhuism ke baad aaya kyunki scholar tumlogo se aur tumhare anpadh journey, rajendra Prasad aur raajiv Patel jaise farzi Facebookiya whatsappiya historians se jyada padhe likhe aur bahut research ke baad apni baat rakhte hai jabki tumhare log bas Facebook - WhatsApp par hi gyān dete hai aur usi post ko uthakar book likh dete hai jisko bheemte gajpooto ke alawa koi bhaav nahi deta 😂😂.
@smlanka4u:
@NishantKumar-ry9rp, Vedic texts used early Sanskrit. But other Hindu texts used a later developed Sanskrit. Prakrit was a spoken language in early Magadha, and it could disappear after the Chandraguptha's invation. Also, Jainism and a lot of Hindu texts developed after 3rd century BCE. They could develop those texts to prevent a Buddhist to be a king in Magadha. They have destroyed detail about Uggrasena and Maha-Padmananda (Porus). But greak sources and Buddhist sources have details about them. It shows that a big tragedy have happened to the Indian history after 3rd century BCE. Also, they have tried to change history and hide story using new texts with new stories. Mahabharat is a text like that because it contains some popular names with different stories of them. Also, the Buddhist Jataka tale about Rama-Pandith has taken to develop those stories. Buddhist texts don't mention any other god called Rama. The new Hindu texts have tried to convert the Buddha into an Avatar of Vishnu. They have don't a lot of things like that to damage the original Buddhism. You can't even imagine how much deep the original teachings of the Buddha. Those teachings are based on directly observed fundamentals. Hindus have tried to make new stories about gods and nature without understanding some fundamentals of nature correctly.
@NishantKumar-ry9rp:
@smlanka4u @smlanka4u phir apne anpadh journey ka gapod sunane laga bina research kiye 😑. Laukik sanskrit bhi tumhare Buddhuism se pahle ki hai aur laukik sanskrit ka grammarian astadhyayi ke racheyta panini ka kaal toh khud bahut saare scholars bhi Buddha se pahle ka maante hai kyunki astadhyayi me Buddha ka kahin ullekh nahi hai par Krishna ji ka hai aur laukik sanskrit ke grammarian panini se bhi pahle hi chuke hai aur unke naam khud panini ji ne likha hai jo unse pahle sanskrit ke vyakaran par kaam kar chuke hai aur dasrath jatak se ramayan nahi balki ramayan se dasrath jatak nikli hai aur iska pata toh tabhi chal jata hai jab tum puri jatak padh loge . Dasrath jatak aur valmiki ramayan me kuch major differences hai aur baaki jaatako me joh examples diye gaye hai ram ji ,sita ji aur kaushlya ji ke wo dasrath jatak se bilkul bhi match nahi karte balki valmiki ramayan se match karte hain aur dasrath jatak padhoge toh usme Jo dasrath ji hai woh bhi vedic devtao ki upasana karte hue bataye gaye hai jabki agar dasrath jatak mul hoti toh usme dasrath ji Gautam Buddha se purva ke Buddha ki upasana karte na ki vedic devtao ki aur dasrath jatak me raam ji ko kahin bhi dhanurdhari nahi bataya gya hai par 200 BCE ke coins par ram ji ko dhanush ke saath dikhya gya hai aur isse saaf pata chalta hai ki ramayan se copy karke dasrath jatak banayi gayi hai aur buddhcharitam me khud valmiki ji aur ramayan se jude logo ka ullekh aata hai aur valmiki ji ko adikavi kaha gya hai par dasrath jatak me kahin bhi aadi kavi valmiki ji ka ullekh nahi hai aur ramayan se jude hue sculptures tak prapt ho chuke hai BCE ke aur 2000 warsa purani Spitzer manuscript me bhi Mahabharat ke parvo aur ramji , sitaji ke apharan ka , lankesh ka aur vanarraj ka ullekh hai par dasrath jatak me kahin bhi Sita ji ke apharan ka , lankesh ka aur vanarraj ka ullekh nahi hai balki valmiki ramayan me hai aur china se prapt purani manuscript tak me ullekh mil jata hai ki ramayan ki rachna valmiki ji aur Mahabharat ki rachna vedvyas ji ne ki hai aur lagbhag 1st century CE ki book mahavibhasa naam ke granth tak me ramayana ke 12000 shlokas me hone ka ullekh hai ab tum mujhe batao ki tumhara dasrath jatak 12000 shlokas me hai kya ya phir tumhare dasrath jatak ka naam ramayan hai kya 😂😂. Bahut se Scholars bhi ramayan ko kamse kam 5th century BCE ka toh maante hi hai aur kuch kuch scholars toh ramayan ko 8th - 7th century BCE ka bhi maante hai kyunki ramayan me Buddha, mahaveer, jain , mahajanpad, magadh , mauryas , ajatshatru, bimbisara, shishunaag inn me se kisi ka bhi ullekh nahi hai jabki ram ji , sitaji inn sabhi ka bouddho ke grantho me aur jaino ke grantho me ullekh milta hai aur ramayan se jude hue sculptures bhi mil jaate hai BCE ke aur koi bhi scholar yeh nahi maanta ki dasrath jatak se copy karke ramayan likhi gayi balki har scholar maante hai ki valmiki ramayan ko vikrit karke dasrath jatak likhi gayi hai aur rahi baat Buddha ke Siddhant ki toh tumhe ya kisi ko bhi Buddha ke Siddhant ke baare me kaise pata chala? Tripitak se hi na ? Aur hamare log bhi toh usi tripitak se cheezo ko dikha rahe hai aur agar tum yeh kahoge ki brahmano ne milavat kar diya toh purani manuscripts se , pattharo se , atta katha se aur mul paali inn sabhi se yeh saari gandagi dikha denge agar kabhi stream me join hoge tab aur tumhare yahan toh council hua karte the aur tripitak ko samay - samay par review bhi kiya jata tha tab tumhare bouddh bhikkhu milavat pehchan kyun nahi paayein utne warso me ? Asal me kuch bhi milavat nahi hai bas tum log ab fas chuke ho isliye ulte sidhe excuse de rahe ho aur tumhare paas koi bhi tark nahi hai unn cheezo ko milavat saabit karne ke liye 😂😂.
@smlanka4u:
@NishantKumar-ry9rp, The existing texts of Ramanaya is not much old. You have to do a better research first because the Rama-Pandith in the Jataka tale was a non-violent Bodhisatwa, and he was not violent like the Rama in Valmiki's Ramayan. Buddhists don't need to copy the story of Rama for any reason. Lankawatara Sutra mentioned that Ravana lived after the birth of the Buddha. Rama-Pandith could live any other human world because Buddhism mentions four types of continents of Humans. Also, Hindu texts are wrong about the evolution of Humans because those texts mentions the existence of Humans millions of years ago. Hindus have tried to insult Lanka and Ravana on some reasons. Hinduism has developed a lot of fictional characters like Hanuman. You have to try to use your common sense to understand how much funny those stories are.
@NishantKumar-ry9rp:
@smlanka4u direct stream me enter karo . Tumhara debate natraj nachiketa ji se karwata hu mein abhi
@smlanka4u:
@NishantKumar-ry9rp, You can see how I have explained those things in a blog called Buddhist essentials and concepts blogspot. It will be useful for you to research it if you want. Also, there is an explanation here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHnC9KAj4vI. You have to give enough time to study them.
@ashupal99:
@smlanka4u you know porus time era porus exist in. 327 bc and chanakya exists in 276 bc 😂😂😂😂😂😂 history pad le
@smlanka4u:
@ashupal99, Some texts say that Chanakya killed Porus. Alexander didn't kill Porus. Chandragupta met Alexander on some reasons. And he received help from Helana too. Porus died around 321 BCE. Chandragupta and Chanakya killed Porus's son Dhana Nanda in 321 BCE. Don't make fake arguments.
@ashupal99:
@smlanka4u some text but it's correlated history recorded by sequencing of text in which many text not correlated many are fakes and you think they true 😂😂😂 then bro yyou fooled himself
@smlanka4u:
@ashupal99, It is not the point here. You said that Chanakya didn't exist in the Porus's time. It is wrong. No one exists in texts. But the name Chanakya is mentioned in many reliable sources with Chandraguptha. You can't hide history in modern times. Also, you can't easily hide violence in modern times. Therefore, some people use many other methods to misguide common people. But sometime, they become jokers in front of the wise people. It is so funny. Sometimes, they have to pretend that they are good and wise people because there are a lot of CCTV and other cameras. A lot of them don't know that they don't know. Alexander's people killed Porus after the death of Alexander according to some sources. You think you are smart because of your childish assumptions. Children smile for no reason. It is good. Keep it up.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
धर्म,मत,पंथ संप्रदाय इसमें से कौन सा मानते है आप ? Open Debate Invitation & Discussion:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O87ZcyuAFeU
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#If Buddhism belives in reincarnation, why not Atman? #Swami Sarvapriyananda:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CRIdg7aiJYA
@smlanka4u:
The mind-stream (Citta-Vithi) is a result of the ultimate matter units called Rupa-Kalapa, and both of them continues for 17 mind moments (51 arising, existing and dissolving moments). The states of those 17 mind moments are different to each other even if they have common properties because it depends on the nature of continuation of the matter unit. The physical and mental faculties are the imperment soul that cause the mind to continue like a life, even if those faculties are not parts of a soul. The mind receives information about previous actions called Prawuthi (Pre-News) Vipaka (Results) from those faculties. But those faculties are impermenent. The mind is only a product of the nature, and many parts of the nature can behave like its faculties. Also, some spiritual/mental faculties like the 'need-to-know-the-unknown-thing faculty' (Anagngnaathagngnassaamindriya) become dominant with the stream-entry (Sothapanna) state of the mind. Male and Female faculties can change from life to life on some reasons. Faculties (Indriya's) have the power to control other faculties, and that is why they have the name of the God called Indra.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Why I Went to WAR with Stephen Hawking!” Leonard Susskind: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYIcWi3FWjY
@smlanka4u:
Stephen Hawking supported the Big Bang theory to support creationism, and he made Hawking radiation theory to end the universe to support creationism. Also, he used the word God in his books a lot. It is childish.
@KOIFishcatL
What about Newton, and also Francis Bacon, fool
@smlanka4u:
@KOIFishcat, Newton had written that Jesus can't be a son of God. The mass of Black Holes increase in vacuum too. Therefore, Hawking Radiation is a lie. But creationists try to use it to ignore Big Bounce theory.
@smlanka4u:
Black Holes grow with or without absorbing matter. Therefore, Hawking radiation theory doesn't work in reality. Black Holes can cause a Big Bounce after absorbing almost all the ordinary matter and Dark matter because the expansion (Dark Energy) depends on Black Holes.
@ludviglidstrom6924:
What are you talking about? This is just gobbledygook.
@smlanka4u:
@ludviglidstrom6924, New observations confirmed that the growth of Black Holes makes Dark Energy.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
बौद्ध पर्व दीपदान उत्सव ही है दिवाली | Diwali baudh Parv hai | Buddha and Emperor Ashoka started
@deepakkrmaurya2222:
Very nice, we have been celebrating this festival since two year as Buddha light festival (Deepdan mahotsav) with my family and relatives.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
🤣Humor alert Bhuka Buddhist Ex Muslims Ko Fund Dega | Dr. Mufti Yasir Nadeem Al Wajidi: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfeWHrGfk_k
@smlanka4u:
Islam is a disrespect to humanity because it promotes violence against Ex-Muslims and non-Muslims. Muslims don't know that they don't know the difference between good and bad because Islam doesn't teach good and bad correctly. Also, Islam and Islamic politics try to control people with unethical laws and gangsters. These Muslims are using a fake Buddhist to promote their lies.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Palga Rinpoche Tibetan Buddhist Monk. Impermanence. Nature of Happiness 2023 @PalgaRinpoche
@smlanka4u:
The past is an illusion to a self because the self is only a conventional truth. The absolute (Param) meaningful (Artha) truths (Dhammas) make the conventional truths. Attachment becomes addictions (Asrava/Asava in Pali) if we use desire with attachment (Chanda-Raga). We have to remove addictions to purify the mind to attain Nibbana/Nirvana.
The past is an illusion to a self because the self is only a conventional truth. The absolute (Param) meaningful (Artha) truths (Dhammas) make the conventional truths. Attachment becomes addictions (Asrava/Asava in Pali) if we use desire with attachment (Chanda-Raga). We have to remove addictions to purify the mind to attain Nibbana/Nirvana.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shingon Mikkyo — Esoteric Buddhism in Mount Koya, Japan: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_tvtXPPpGw
@smlanka4u:
The original science of Buddhism is in Tripitaka. The ultimate realities called Paramartha Dhamma are the building blocks of the mind and matter.
@voodoohack7704:
The constituents of the vehicle and the paths to heavenly rebirths are in the Tripitaka, the way to union with Brahma, also yoga, ways of analysis and mindfulness. However the yogic powers are useless if one doesn't realize individually the purity of mind, reality, the triple gate, the unconditioned samadhi. The best thing I learned from Tripitaka is mindfulness and dependent origination. But the Mahayana gave me access to this individual realization which people call mind-only. I cannot say which is better Vipassana or the pure Samadhi concentration.
@smlanka4u:
@voodoohack7704 , The anatomy of the mind is well explained in Abhidhamma Pitaka in Thripikata. Those teachings have a lot of answers.
@voodoohack7704:
@smlanka4u For me Abhidhamma is simply a summary of all teachings and some logical deductions together with them. I prefer the sutras as a first hand information source. Even though - anatomy of the mind - there's no mind to be found anywhere because it'd be a false illusory one.
@smlanka4u:
@voodoohack7704 , No. Abhidhamma Pitaka was a different single Sutta, and you can't find the core teachings of Abhidharma from Sutta Pitaka. Therefore, it is not a summary. It contains the core teachings in Buddhism with best definitions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This INSANE Kids Show Brainwashed the Children of Gaza | David Wood & Apostate Prophet LIVE
क्या धनतेरस और दीपावली बौद्धों के उत्सव है? Dhanteras Deepawali Was Buddhist festival? DIKSHA TV
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
මෙන්න මේ කන්ද උඩ තමා දිව්යලෝකෙ තියෙන්නේ: https://web.facebook.com/watch/?comment_id=712710380775326&v=1034197390926820
'%3E%3Cpath d='M15.9963 8c0 4.4179-3.5811 7.9993-7.9986 7.9993-4.4176 0-7.9987-3.5814-7.9987-7.9992 0-4.4179 3.5811-7.9992 7.9987-7.9992 4.4175 0 7.9986 3.5813 7.9986 7.9992Z' fill='url(%23paint0_linear_15251_63610)'/%3E%3Cpath d='M15.9973 7.9992c0 4.4178-3.5811 7.9992-7.9987 7.9992C3.5811 15.9984 0 12.417 0 7.9992S3.5811 0 7.9986 0c4.4176 0 7.9987 3.5814 7.9987 7.9992Z' fill='url(%23paint1_radial_15251_63610)'/%3E%3Cpath d='M7.9996 5.9081c-.3528-.8845-1.1936-1.507-2.1748-1.507-1.4323 0-2.4254 1.328-2.4254 2.6797 0 2.2718 2.3938 4.0094 4.0816 5.1589.3168.2157.7205.2157 1.0373 0 1.6878-1.1495 4.0815-2.8871 4.0815-5.159 0-1.3517-.993-2.6796-2.4254-2.6796-.9811 0-1.822.6225-2.1748 1.507Z' fill='%23fff'/%3E%3C/g%3E%3Cdefs%3E%3CradialGradient id='paint1_radial_15251_63610' cx='0' cy='0' r='1' gradientUnits='userSpaceOnUse' gradientTransform='matrix(0 7.9992 -7.99863 0 7.9986 7.9992)'%3E%3Cstop offset='.5637' stop-color='%23E11731' stop-opacity='0'/%3E%3Cstop offset='1' stop-color='%23E11731' stop-opacity='.1'/%3E%3C/radialGradient%3E%3ClinearGradient id='paint0_linear_15251_63610' x1='2.3986' y1='2.4007' x2='13.5975' y2='13.5993' gradientUnits='userSpaceOnUse'%3E%3Cstop stop-color='%23FF74AE'/%3E%3Cstop offset='.5001' stop-color='%23FA2E3E'/%3E%3Cstop offset='1' stop-color='%23FF5758'/%3E%3C/linearGradient%3E%3CclipPath id='clip0_15251_63610'%3E%3Cpath fill='%23fff' d='M-.001.0009h15.9992v15.9984H-.001z'/%3E%3C/clipPath%3E%3C/defs%3E%3C/svg%3E){kind=small}
'/%3E%3Cpath d='M16.0001 7.9996c0 4.418-3.5815 7.9996-7.9995 7.9996S.001 12.4176.001 7.9996 3.5825 0 8.0006 0C12.4186 0 16 3.5815 16 7.9996Z' fill='url(%23paint1_radial_15251_63610)'/%3E%3Cpath d='M16.0001 7.9996c0 4.418-3.5815 7.9996-7.9995 7.9996S.001 12.4176.001 7.9996 3.5825 0 8.0006 0C12.4186 0 16 3.5815 16 7.9996Z' fill='url(%23paint2_radial_15251_63610)' fill-opacity='.5'/%3E%3Cpath d='M7.3014 3.8662a.6974.6974 0 0 1 .6974-.6977c.6742 0 1.2207.5465 1.2207 1.2206v1.7464a.101.101 0 0 0 .101.101h1.7953c.992 0 1.7232.9273 1.4917 1.892l-.4572 1.9047a2.301 2.301 0 0 1-2.2374 1.764H6.9185a.5752.5752 0 0 1-.5752-.5752V7.7384c0-.4168.097-.8278.2834-1.2005l.2856-.5712a3.6878 3.6878 0 0 0 .3893-1.6509l-.0002-.4496ZM4.367 7a.767.767 0 0 0-.7669.767v3.2598a.767.767 0 0 0 .767.767h.767a.3835.3835 0 0 0 .3835-.3835V7.3835A.3835.3835 0 0 0 5.134 7h-.767Z' fill='%23fff'/%3E%3Cdefs%3E%3CradialGradient id='paint1_radial_15251_63610' cx='0' cy='0' r='1' gradientUnits='userSpaceOnUse' gradientTransform='rotate(90 .0005 8) scale(7.99958)'%3E%3Cstop offset='.5618' stop-color='%230866FF' stop-opacity='0'/%3E%3Cstop offset='1' stop-color='%230866FF' stop-opacity='.1'/%3E%3C/radialGradient%3E%3CradialGradient id='paint2_radial_15251_63610' cx='0' cy='0' r='1' gradientUnits='userSpaceOnUse' gradientTransform='rotate(45 -4.5257 10.9237) scale(10.1818)'%3E%3Cstop offset='.3143' stop-color='%2302ADFC'/%3E%3Cstop offset='1' stop-color='%2302ADFC' stop-opacity='0'/%3E%3C/radialGradient%3E%3ClinearGradient id='paint0_linear_15251_63610' x1='2.3989' y1='2.3999' x2='13.5983' y2='13.5993' gradientUnits='userSpaceOnUse'%3E%3Cstop stop-color='%2302ADFC'/%3E%3Cstop offset='.5' stop-color='%230866FF'/%3E%3Cstop offset='1' stop-color='%232B7EFF'/%3E%3C/linearGradient%3E%3C/defs%3E%3C/svg%3E){kind=small}
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consciousness and Cosmic Purpose | Philip Goff on Fine-Tuning and Panpsychism: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wBamkPZ6pkc
@smlanka4u:
The smallest moment of consciousness is called Chittakhana (Citta/mind-moment) in Pali.
@metaRising:
I didn't know that!
@alexgonzo5508:
Interesting.. that implies that consciousness is quantized like a "Planck unit". Perhaps one moment of consciousness is equal to one instance of interaction between two parts or units, since the word "consciousness" which etymologically means "knowing together" implies a minimum of two things working together in order to know either themselves or something apart from both, which further implies that consciousness is perhaps not possible in a state of perfect singular unity, but must by necessity be differentiated into parts that can interact in some deterministic way (since an indeterministic way would yield chaos and thus no knowledge or possibility of knowing). One fundamental thing with no parts can not be conscious of itself or anything else until the presence of another affords the opportunity and ability for reflection. The more parts working together, the more complex and expanded the consciousness becomes.
@smlanka4u:
@metaRising, It is well explained in the Rupa (Matter) Chapter in the fundamentals of Theravada.
@smlanka4u:
@alexgonzo5508, The Citta/mind is an output of the touch between the six sense faculties and the objects they receive. They make Cittaja Rupa (mind-born matter).
@smlanka4u:
Dark Energy is a result of moving space inside and outside the observable universe, and large Black Holes absorb the matter in space, and cause expanding the universe.
@metaRising:
Is this your theory?
@smlanka4u:
@metaRising, Yes. But a scientific paper confirmed that Black Holes cause Dark Energy while they grow. Dark Energy is a misleading concept.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What is Rebirth, and Should We Care? | Prajnamanas
Islam Allows Muslims To Own Slaves And S*X Slaves 💀💀💀 (Ex Muslim Explains)
The Buddhist Teaching of No-Self is a Lie
Arguments Against Christianity - Part 4 -Buddhism
🤬 Deep Explanation To 'NEVER GET ANGRY AGAIN' In Buddhism | Zen Secret🙏
@smlanka4u:
Thank you so much for helping people to look at their emotions and feelings. Anger is more dangerous than greed according to my experiences. Delusion, greed, and anger are the root causes that give us bad results. 🙏❤❤
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your Perception of Reality Will Be Changed by This Knowledge. Planes of Existence
@smlanka4u:
Thank you. Some planes of existence from the 31 planes of existence are located in the mountain called Meru. The earth is also a part of it. ❤
@Spiritionn:
Thank you! In the future, I plan to consider the concept of planes of reality both in the traditions of Buddhism (The Thirty-one Planes of Existence) and Hinduism. There are already some sketches, but I don’t promise that it will be soon. Thank you for your feedback!
@smlanka4u:
@Spiritionn, You can use the lectures on Buddhist Cosmology by Ven. Ajahn Punnadhammo to understand the nature of the planes of existence in detail. Those realms have direct relationships to our states of the mind. So, it is a great knowledge.
@Spiritionn:
Thank you very much! 🙏
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
प्लास्टर करवाकर मिटा दिया Samrat Ashoka के बनवाये प्रतिक चिन्ह | Chaneti Buddhist Stupa | Buddha
Change Your Life Now with True Buddhism | Clarifying Common Misconceptions
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Has Indian Media and Academia Misleadingly Painted Ashoka as a Pacifist? | Sanjeev Sanyal: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/sYWofaxbuLo
@shirokun4742:
Akhbar Alexander ashoka
Are not great
@smlanka4u:
Chandragupta and Brahmana Chanakya killed Buddhist kings in Magadha. Asoka was not a Buddhist because brahamins controlled Magadha kingdom after 320 BCE, and only a supporter of Brahamanism could became a king in Magadha.
@hsmahbiv7474:
Add mother teresa and gandhi in it
@Snorlax108:
@smlanka4u bro is making history from his imaginations 😂
@smlanka4u:
@Snorlax108, Maha-Padmananda (Padma = Lotus = A Buddhist name) was a Buddhist, and his son Dhana Nanda was the last Nanda King. And Magadhi Prakrit was a commonly used language in Magadha. But Mauryan empire has done something to the people who spoke Prakrit until the king Asoka convertion. Also, they have changed and hide their history before and after the period of the King Asoka. Maha-PadmaNanda (Porus) and other Nanda kings were fighting with Alexander the great while they captured the Magadha kindom with the help of Alexander and other forein armies. Hinduism was not in Magadha until the establishment of Mauran empire, and they developed Hinduism with new stories. Also, they copied other religions to make their stories.
@smlanka4u:
Arhat Ven. Moggaliputta Tissa monk converted the King Asoka into a Buddhist after the war in Kalinga. Brahamins established the Mauryan empire against Buddhist kings, and only a follow of them could become a King in Magadha. Also, they have copied Buddhistm to developed Jainism and Hinduism. Most certainly, Asoka was not a Buddhist
@mlg1279:
Jainism & Hinduism are much older than Buddhism.
Asoka became a Buddhist much BEFORE the Kalinga war
@smlanka4u:
@mlg1279, Mauryan empire was violent from the begining, and Asoka just continued it with the help of Brahamins. They sponsored the fist Jain council to establish Jainism. And then, they made more texts to protect Brahamanism against the strong Buddhist ethics. And they tried to convert the Buddha into an Avatar of Vishnu with the new texts of Jainism and Hinduism. The fake stories in Hinduism have made a fake history in India. Jainism and Hinduism have made a history older than Human evolution. Also, the Brahamins didn't easily let a Buddhist to become a King in Magadha after the death of Asoka. Asoka was violent because of the influence of Brahamanism against the Buddhist culture in early India. There is no evidence to prove that early Mauryan empire and Asoka supported Buddhist culture before the Kalinga's war. Your assumptions are not enough. Sri Lankan texts and all the other early texts have mentioned that Asoka was not a Buddhist. So, don't try to make a fake story about Asoka to protect the fake history of Hinduism and Jainism. It is not easy in modern times.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
असम का कामाख्या मंदिर है प्राचीन बौद्ध विहार | Kamakhya Temple of Assam is a Buddhist Vihar
Superiority of Solitude in Early Buddhism: The Rhinoceros Sutta
@smlanka4u:
Yes. We need time to attain Jhana/Samadhi (transcendental) states of the mind. Also, we should use only one emotional feeling to still the mind quickly because words are irrelevent during the deep states of the mind. Thanks.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zen Master Instructs Israelis How To Kill WITHOUT Compassion:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DH0aU9TXD1I
@smlanka4u:
Some jealous creationists use fake Buddhists to make fake news. Ego comes with the delusion of self, and ego justifies bad actions like anger and greed. A lot of creationists have a lot of egos, and they try to develop their ego, using anger and greed. And they use violence and lies to protect and promote their believes while trying to harm and insult better spiritual paths and good qualities of people. A lot of creationists don't believe in good qualities of people, and they expect to go to heaven, using their beliefs and childish unethical lifestyles.
@servanttofriend8481:
@smlanka4u Karma will have something to say about that! ;)
@smlanka4u:
@servanttofriend8481, Karma (reactions) continues the mind after the death, using greed and natural causes. Therefore, an unpurified mind is not reliable, and it can move into a good or bad plane of existence from the 31 planes of existence without our control because it is completely a natural process.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A Buddhist Family Converts to Christianity (ft. Susan Lim): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NlnHEcfX2hU
@smlanka4u:
Real Buddhist teachings are not Mahayana teachings. Theravada Abhidhamma is much better than modern science, and I could verify the truth in those teachings mathematically.
@ari3lz3pp:
@smlanka4u Seek truth and light! 🙏🕊️✨
Nothing is more powerful than a relationship with Adonai Jesus.
@smlanka4u:
@ari3lz3pp , Natural causes are the truths, and no one can save you from the unreliable cycle of rebirth. You have to walk the path. Just wake up and try to understand the suffering of all living beings. Don't worry about popular or rich people like Jesus if you really care about the lives of all living beings. You have nothing to worry about Jesus because he didn't die on the cross, and he had to die one day like all others. Romans and Mary's Uncle helped him to escape from Israel to save him from the Jewish priests. You warry about him because you think that he has special powers save you, and you want his help to ignore the real natural nature of life and natural possibilities. Also, some politicians used some people and religions to control people to protect their power with politically useful laws and common or selfish standards. The life is a more complex process than having only one lifetime. Therefore, living with beliefs without trying to understand the true nature of life wastes the life. A lot of scientists and educated people in some countries have a lot of greed, anger and delusion because some educational systems don't teach good qualities to them, and they just learn to make a lot of money and power to maintain their ego. Also, they follow instructions of politicians and religious powers when they popularize knowledge. Therefore, you can't expect truth from them all the time. You have to do the investigation yourself.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WOTM: How To Discern Between God's Voice And Your Own
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DELSIONAL BUDAHIST SAYS HE DECIDES WHATS WRONG AND RIGHT... THAN HE TOOK QURAN: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WqT4p3iQV0
@smlanka4u:
Ex-Muslims are hiding to live. Islam disrespects humanity. Violence of Islam proves that a creator God doesn't exist. Bad intentions with greed, anger, and delusion make bad Karma/results.
@dawahfraternity:
So violence of Atheism proves he does?
@smlanka4u:
@dawahfraternity , Atheists don't kill living beings to develop Atheism.
@dawahfraternity:
@smlanka4u what religion did Stalin belong to
@smlanka4u:
@dawahfraternity, Stalin studied from a western country, and that could be a reason for his violence.
@dawahfraternity:
@smlanka4u answer the question
@smlanka4u:
@dawahfraternity, Joseph Stalin went to a Church school, and he lived with creationists. Usually, fake atheists and creationists are like unethical irreligious people. They just use creationism to pretend to be religious to get support from their community. And some creationists support violence if it helps promoting creationism. Islam is a big representation of violence of unscientific creationism. Creationism helps creationists to ignore the bad results of their bad actions because they try to use a creator to get forgiveness. Creationism is a selfish concept, and it is a childish concept.
@dawahfraternity:
@smlanka4u not answering the question
. Got it
@smlanka4u:
@dawahfraternity, We didn't see his heart to tell what he believed. We just have background information. Don't try to show me that you are smart with your word tricks. I'm sure that you are not smart. You don't need to ask question to tell me what you know. You were trying to waste my time without asking real questions. You should not use tricks like that to prevent a fair conversation because I'm not here to listen to your lectures. Muslims are famous for using tricks like that to change the topic to ignore the truth.
@anxoidenamikaze1551:
From who did you take this rule. Violence has good effect and bad effect. Sometimes we need to be violent against people who are violent and injust.
@smlanka4u:
@anxoidenamikaze1551, You can't remove the result of your bad actions, or get forgiveness for your bad actions because the memory of your bad action exists in nature, and you can't escape from those memories. If you know that you will regret for the results of your bad actions, then you would stop yourself from doing bad actions. You can't do a bad action with a good intention because you can't use good emotions to make a good intention while doing bad actions. Your ego has a lot of reasons to justify your bad actions. A bad religion can make you do bad actions from childhood, and your ego would prevent you from thinking about the bad results of your bad actions because you know that you have done a lot of bad actions, and you know that you will have a fear to die if you accept that those bad actions are naturally bad actions. It is a trap. Some religions are traps like that because some religions allow followers to do bad actions, reducing the chances of becoming good people. The victims of bad religions are afraid to accept the results of their bad actions. Also, they are afraid to accept the natural process of rebirth, and their ego makes them feel that they are correct.
@_Mo-Ham_:
"what religion did Stalin belong to"
- Stalin was an atheis. He was also a communist. It's the latter that was his driver for what he did.
There is no edict in atheism.
@dawahfraternity:
@_Mo-Ham_ so does the violence of the atheist proves God exists accordimg to the logic of our losguided friend above lol
@smlanka4u:
@dawahfraternity, A lot of Christian and Muslim countries did a lot of violence against other countries. The creationism is only a title for unethical racists in those countries, but they use some bad teachings of their religious books to justify their violence whether they believe a creator God or not. You can't tell that Hitler or Stalin killed people without a help of creationists. You were trying to justify the violence of creationists by telling me that the leader of those violent creationists was an atheist. Holy Wars and a lot of Islamic wars were directly connected to those religions, and still a lot of Islamic gangsters use the name Islam in their illegal armies. Also, they have countries with unethical laws and armies. But obviously, bad creationists very actively try to insult peaceful religions and societies. Don't try to say that atheists control the armies of creationists. It is a big lie that some creationists try to tell. Also, creationists made their armies in the countries of atheists using new creationist in those countries. And those creationists in those armies have made problems in those countries to make conflicts to promote creationism with the help of foreign creationists. Therefore, atheists must be careful about the creationists in their armies.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Buddhist Monk Ki Research Ka Antim Sanskar | Dr. Mufti Yasir Nadeem Al Wajidi: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wL01_3gsNI
@smlanka4u:
Natural continuation of awareness is rebirth, and no one can stop it. We have to remove greed to stop the process of attachment to another life. A creator God doesn't exist to get forgiveness for any bad action. Rebirth depends on our actions and natural causes. The universe and life had many cyclic periods. Life is just a business for some religions. And some people use religions to do business to develop ego, anger and greed.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@smlanka4u:
The universe is completely natural. Our positive emotional qualities help us go beyond the negative process of the universe, and discontinue our awareness after the end of our lives. It is the law of Karma. Nothing personal.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@smlanka4u:
The universe is completely natural. Our positive emotional qualities help us go beyond the negative process of the universe, and discontinue our awareness after the end of our lives. It is the law of Karma. Nothing personal.
@meeraakif6192:
Bhai kehna kya chahte ho? You are just writing stuff with no meaning...
@smlanka4u:
@meeraakif6192, Your memories make your ego, and your identification is your ego. You loose your ownership if you don't have an ego, and you become a good person who don't have a place to live in any realm of existence because all the realms of existence need your ego and greed to make you again.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Harvard Professor: Shame on Harvard!
1 Hr Challenge - Abhidhamma
Buddhist Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) with Rev. Dr. John Freese #buddhism
@smlanka4u:
Observing the mind to understand the meaninglessness of the self concept is a Buddhist practice.
@diegocharlin5502:
@smlanka4u Mindfulness has roots in various religious and secular traditions, including Hinduism, Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, and Daoism act is a secular practice. not religious at all..
@smlanka4u:
@diegocharlin5502, Buddhist Mindfulness is based on non-self nature of the body and mind. Therefore, it is different from the all other religions. Concentration (Samadhi) is not mindfulness. Focusing Attention (Satipatthana) to the body and mind to understand their natural process is Buddhist mindfulness. And it helps to reject the concept of a permanent soul. Mental/Spiritual and Physical faculties are not parts of a permanent soul because they change with time according to those unique Buddhist teachings. And we can understand it with our experience and attention. Vipassana (special-seeing) is a uniqure type of meditation because it is based on the Buddhist teachings on dependent origination (Paticca Samuppada). No other teaching explains the process of ultimate truths/realities (Paramartha Satya) that make the conventional truths like self and other concepts.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Bible's True Origins Can DESTROY Christianity: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eanu1BgkO5E
@carmelovirgiliolim2984:
"The truth will set man free."
@smlanka4u:
The delusion of self is ego. We have to remove ego to understand that the concept of self is an illusion. It is the truth.
@lukaswilliams5851:
@smlanka4u what do you get to after you pass up this ego. That all is one? There is no separation between you and everything else? Does that really ring true to you
@smlanka4u:
@lukaswilliams5851, Awareness/Knowingness is the separation of our lives. We are the creator God of our lives because the consciousness and body are the worlds of us. Consciousness is an smallest moment of observation that continues from life to life. Observers and material elements could exist from an uncountable time ago. Consciousness is like a magecian and it behaves like a God in heavenly realms. The name of the observer is Citta in Pali. It is un ultimate reality. We have to understand that observers are parts of the natural nature, and we are just natural products. We have to understand the reason to the existence of our observations to prevent us observe unhealthy states of consciousness and stop the continuation of observations. We are just using some emotional qualities in nature to continue our existence. We have to use better emotional qualities to stop our existence. We are just our ego, and we have greed and anger because of our ego. Greed is the reason to the continuation of our existence from one life to another because it is an attachment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Why Buddhism decayed in India? ‒ Dzongsar Khyentse Rinpoche: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9OGuURFWYo
@smlanka4u:
Chandragupta Maurya and Brahamin Chanakya invaded the Buddhist Magadha kingdom in 321 BCE, and they could cause declining of early Buddhist culture in India and the death of the Prakirt Languages (The language of the Buddha and early Buddhists).
@user-wb8ql4ky7j:
Lol his grandson Ashoka was budhist ,there were all relegion within their family, hindu Jain budhist ajivak sampradaye,, so don't fool yourself
@parjanyashukla176:
@user-wb8ql4ky7j
Ashoka was most likely a secular person but his tilt might have been towards the Sangha because of the prevailing social situation at that time.
@smlanka4u:
@user-wb8ql4ky7j, You can't prove that King Asoka was a Buddhists before the Kalinga war. Don't try to make new stories like the later developed Indian history. Moggaliputta Thissa Thero converted Asoka into Buddhism, and he helped King Asoka to be better. Hindus came from Pakistan (Thakshila), and they took the control in India with the help of Brahamanical powers during the Alexander's invation. Also, they have destroyed the major languages of Buddhists (Prakrit languages), and they sponsored and developed Jainism and Hinduism with new stories to challange Buddhist teachings while coping Buddhist teachings. Most new religions Indian stories are illogical and they contain a history older than Human's evolution. And those stories have tried to hide the Buddhist history. Don't believe those funny stories if you really use your brain. The rise the Brahamanical system made new stories to protect their power without letting a Buddhist to become a king again, and they took the power again after the death of Asoka. Also, they developed Mahayana tradition to challange the original Buddhist teachings. Still, India has a big caste system because of them.
@smlanka4u:
@parjanyashukla176, The invations of Brahamanical powers started since the time of the Buddha, and they established their power in Magadha with the help of the Alexander's invation and other supporters. Also, they could easily get power in Magadha because of the peaceful Buddhist tradition in early Magadha. Their invations continued until the King Asoka meating a fully enlightened Buddhist Thero. He was just continuing the wars of others until he finds the truth. Later developed text could try to change the history to change the reasons the invations. Brahamanical empires didn't like a Buddhist to be a king because they knew that Buddhists reject caste system. Still, they are trying their best to hide their violence with their new stories and new interpretations while trying to change the history king Asoka and others. They try to make a new history with the things that king Asoka didn't wrote on stones. Some highly educated Indian historians give lectures like that to make people think that King Asoka didn't stop using slaves. They and some unintelligent educated people in India and in other countries are trying to do it to show the world that they were better than Buddhists. It is a normal mentality which they received from the Brahamanical educational system and other belief systems. Also, some Christians in Sri Lanka are trying to make a Christian history in Sri Lanka without any evidence while ignoring real history and strong evidence against their claims. Also, a lot of educated people have tried to support their caste or ethnic group while trying to hide real history. But they can't easily control social media in modern times. Some highly educated people have made religions to attack others because they think they have a right to decide what normal people should believe. Some scientists and highly educated people don't know that they don't have enough knowledge to guide people. Sometimes, they want to show that they will provide people all the answers. But normal people waste their life while waiting until those highly educated people discover the truth of life. Usually, they don't understand that they are not more intelligent than an uneducated good person. Therefore, they let normal people suffer from wars and alcohol more than them. Some religious or educated people don't easily make laws to limit alcohol and other unhealthy things because they don't care about the value of higher levels of intelligence and goodness we can achieve and must achieve. Some unethical religious educational systems and the followers of those educational systems usually don't guide people to achieve higher levels of intelligence. Seemingly, a lot of educated people in most medias and popular platforms focus on entertainment and gossips, and their contents usually doesn't increase the knowledge and ethics of normal people. Useless movies and dramas and other contents show the low level of intelligene of the creators of them. Some Indian teledramas and a lot of other teledramas and a lot of movies have wasted a lot of time of people in a lot of countries. But a lot of educated people don't even know that a lot of people waste their time with useless things becauses a lot of educated people waste their time with useless things based on their useless concepts about the life too.
@parjanyashukla176:
@smlanka4u
Please take your nonsense elsewhere 🙏
@smlanka4u:
@parjanyashukla176, You would not have a good reply to those things. You just ran away. 😂 If you don't have time to reply, then it is fine.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@smlanka4u:
Brahamana Chanakya used the Alexander's invation to invade the Buddhist Magadha kindom to regain the power of Brahamanism in early India.
@mlg1279:
@smlanka4u Magadha was ruled by the Nandas who were Hindu rulers. So...
@smlanka4u:
@mlg1279, Mahapadma Nanda = Great-Lotus Joy = A Buddhist name.
@mlg1279:
@smlanka4u The Nanda dynasty was not Buddhist. The kings favoured Ajivika - however, the majority of their subjects were Hindu.
Btw, Nanda is one of the names of Maha Vishnu.
@smlanka4u:
@mlg1279, Maha-Padma Nanda (Porus) was a son of a king, and his nephew Ugrasena became the first Nanda king in Magadha. They took the power from the Buddhist King Kalashoka and his son. And Nanda kings tried to protect Magadha against Alexander according to Greek sources. Greek sources mentioned two Nanda kings. The last Nanda king Dhana Nanda had a conflict with Brahamana Chanakya during an alms giving functions. Alms giving is a Buddhist culture. King Asoka was continuing the Brahamana Chanakyas war, and he could take help from Brahamanas to continue the war. But Moggaliputta Thero converted King Asoka after the Kalingas war. There are no written evidence to say that King Asoka was a Buddhist before the Kalinga war. Karma worked against the wars of Brahamns against the early Buddhist culture and Buddhists who spoke Prakrit languages. Hindus came from Pakisthan (Thakshila). Also, Karma made conflicts with Pakistan and Hindus. Early Mauryan clearly sponsored and developed Jainism and Hinduism, and they continued it after the death of King Asoka. We can't easily find details about Nanda dynasty and early Buddhist cultures from India because early Mauran empire haven't maintain those records, or they have destroyed those records. But later developed Purana texts have tried to change the details Nanda dynasty and Nanda Kings. They have tried to convert Padmananda into Ugrasena and Parusurama to insult him. Also, they have copied a lot of Buddhist teachings to develop Hinduism because early can't easily make a good religion using the teachings in Vedas. Brahamins have used a lot of new Brahamanical religions to steal the knowledge of a lot of traditions. A lot of early knowledge systems in India were not belong to Brahamanical religions.
@mlg1279:
@smlanka4u Lol, Maha padma Nanda was not Porus. Porus is King Purushottam, who ruled a small kingdom in present day Punjab.
Alexander never attacked Magadha, as his soldiers had rebelled against him, and he was forced to retreat.
Brahmana Chanakya was a Hindu, and alms giving (daanam) is an important principle of Hinduism.
There are inscriptions which confirm that Asoka converted to Buddhism a few years BEFORE the Kalinga war.
Hindus are the original inhabitants of the entire Indian subcontinent - not just Pakistan
@smlanka4u:
@mlg1279, Surely, there are no valid wrtten evidences older than 100 CE or until the end of the Mauryan empire to prove that King Asoka was a Buddhist before the Kalinga war. Hindu and Brahamanical dynasties could develop text later to maintain the power of Hindus against Buddhists. Purushoththam is a later developed name for Porus. There are no written texts to prove that Porus was Purushoththam. Greek sources have mentioned that they were fighting with Nanda kings. According to Porus, he had a nephew, and he didn't have a good background. Same like him, Padma Nanda had a nephew (Ugrasena), and he didn't have a good backgound. Ugrasena could come from Agra, and his name doesn't sound like a Hindu name. Later developed Purana texts have tried to change their identities. Indian educational system is using the details in Purana to teach people Indian history. Early Hindus were living around Sindu river. Usually, Alms giving functions specially focus Buddhist monks, and popular people participate to those functions because they can listen to Buddhist teachings/Dhamma from the monks too.
@mlg1279:
@smlanka4u If there are no valid written evidence older than 100CE, how do u know that Asoka adopted Buddhism after the Kalinga war? 🤣
Also, why would Indian kings have Greek names? If Porus is not Purushottam, then by ur logic Sandracuttus is not Chandragupta?? 🤣
Greek sources clearly mention that Alexander's troops refused to move into Nanda territory as they were informed of the might of the Nanda army. Alexander went back to Persia through the coastal route.
I suggest u to read history before embarrassing ur self.
The vedas were written at least 1000 years before the Buddha. So, Buddhism is nothing but an offshoot of Hinduism - there's nothing new that Buddhism taught that was not discussed in the Upanishads
@smlanka4u:
@mlg1279 , King Asoka's son Mahinda and daughter Sangamiththa came to Sri Lanka, and Sri Lankan sources and other sources have mentioned that King Asoka become a follow of Buddhist teachings after the Kalinga war. Porus was a greek name for Padma Nanda. Porus used Elephents, and Alexander liked his courage. According to Greek records, his son sent an army to support him. It means that he received support from his sons in Nanda Dynasty. But his nephew gave up the battle. It means Uggrasena didn't continue the war, and he escaped. Porus said bad things about the Nanda king. Ugrasena was a thief before he becomes a King because some thiefs took him when he was little. His father became a King after killing a King in his Kindom. Ugrasena was a son of a new King. And he used Padma Nanda (Porus) to become a King in Magadha. Upanishads and a lot of Hindu texts developed from time to time a lot of later developed Sanskrit texts are not older than 500 BCE even if some historians try to use tricks to increase the oldness of those texts. Buddhist teachings are much more profound than Vedas are all the Hindu texts. A lot of Hindus don't know the buddhist teachings on ultimate truths even if they have tried to copy Buddhist teachings, and made a lot Hindu and Mahayana texts to challange the original Buddhist teachings. Early Vedas are not much profound texts. The later developed Hindu texts have used a later developed Sanskrit scripts.
@mlg1279:
@smlanka4u Asokan inscriptions that were done a few years before Kalinga war specifically say that the king adopted Buddhism. These are more authentic than any second-hand sources in Sri Lanka.
The fact that Sri Lankan sources mistook Porus for Maha padma Nanda indicates that these records are unreliable.
"Porus" is only mentioned in Greek records. According to the Greeks, Porus was a king of a small kingdom near Jhelum (today's Pakistan). So, obviously Porus was NOT Mahapadma Nanda as the Nandas ruled a large part of North India, with pataliputra as their capital (present day Patna) (suggest u to look up a map)
The Vedas were written around 1500 BC. That's around 1000 years before the Gautama Buddha. The vedas contain sublime ideology of dharma - karma, and moksha. Buddha was clearly influenced by the Upanishads - as most of his teachings are nothing but a repetition of what was discussed by the great sages of ancient India.
Also, prior to the vedas, there was Shaivism - which according to Tamil scholars is at least 15000 years old. Shaivism is probably the original source of all dharmic teachings
@smlanka4u:
@mlg1279, We can't scientifically prove that Asoka's inscription were done before Kalinga's war. Some westerners and Hindus try to make their suggetions and interpretations to make King Asoka a violence Buddhist. Hindus have an intention to hide their violent history by changing the history of Asoka and Magadha, and it is the real intention behind the manipulation of their history. Probably, Sri Lankan sources didn't mention Porus and Maha-Padma Nanda. But we can find a lot of details of Magadha from Sri Lankan sources that you can't even find from Indian sources. Ugrasena took power from Kalasoka according to Sri Lankan sources. Kalasoka sponsored the 3rd Buddhist council. Buddhist sources and Greek sources have details about Nanda Kings. Also, Jain sources are useful to confirm some details. Purana texts mention Maha-Padma Nanda to make him a bad person. It means, something bad happened to the details of Maha-Padma Nanda in early sources. Padma Nanda could become Great/Maha Padma Nanda because he tried to stop Alexander the great. Usually, Buddhists use the word Maha (Great) to show respect. Nanda Kindom had 8 or 9 Nanda Kings. Padma Nanda could be a King near the Panjab region. A lot of written Sanskrit texts are not older than 400 or 300 BCE, and oral Sanskrit can't make the written texts older than 500 BCE.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@AdvaiticOneness1:
@sacrface420 LoL, Advaita vedanta talks about "Poornam" and not Shunyata! It's the Buddhists who copied Hinduism, concepts of meditation, yoga sutras, dharma, karma, Samsara, Nirvana, etc.
@smlanka4u:
@AdvaiticOneness1 , Advaita Vedanta is mentioned in a later developed Hindu texts and Mahayana texts. Hindus have used the Buddhist concept of emptiness to make Advaita Vedanta.
@AdvaiticOneness1:
@smlanka4u Lol Wrong, Advaita Vedanta predates Mahayana Buddhism and is rooted in the Upanishads and vedas, ancient Hindu scriptures dating back to around 800 BCE. Adi Shankara, lived in the 8th century CE, much earlier than the development of Mahayana Buddhism."Vedanta" means, "Veda"+"Anta" ("end") or "culmination." Therefore, Vedanta can be translated as the "culmination" or "end" of the Vedas. Upanishads, are the philosophical essence of the Vedas. Advaita talks about the concept of ONEness and not about Emptiness! , this concept of ONEness was already there in Vedas which are more than 1600 years older than Mahayana Buddhism!
एकं सद्विप्राः बहुधा वदन्ति
"Truth is ONE, wise call it by various names" - Rig Veda
@smlanka4u:
@AdvaiticOneness1 , 'Truth is one' term in Rig Veda doesn't mention non-duality. There are no two true natural natures in this universe. Also, some Vedic and Hindu texts developed from time to time. Brahamins could develop Mahayana tradition to make it friendly with Brahamanism. Emptiness and non-self teachings explain why we don't have a permanent soul. Our mental/spiritual faculties are parts of nature, and we can't separate us from nature. Brahamins and Hindus have tried to develop Hinduism and Mahayana tradition to maintain Brahamanism because original Buddhist teachings reject caste system. Also, they have tried to hide the history of people who spoke Prakrit languages. And early Buddhists in Magadha could speak Prakrit, and Buddha spoke Prakrit too. Hindus came from Panjab (Pakistan/Thakshila), and they continued the invations until King Asoka end the invations. But Brahamins took the power again after the death of King Asoka. And they continued the Brahamanization (Brahamanikaran/PakandiKaran) of the knowledge of many traditions and cultures.
@AdvaiticOneness1:
@smlanka4u Just gone through your channel! And it explains a lot about you 🤣🤣🤣 Love your Conspiracy theories 😂😂😂 keep doing more videos 🤡🤡🤡
@smlanka4u:
@AdvaiticOneness1, Ok good. I appreciate your silence. You can do your own research to understand hidden truths, without believing your teachers, books, and me.
@AdvaiticOneness1:
@smlanka4u Just gone through your channel! And it explains a lot about you 🤣🤣🤣 Love your Conspiracy theories 😂😂😂 keep doing more videos 🤡🤡🤡
@smlanka4u:
@AdvaiticOneness1, It is a channel about me and researches I do. And I use it to store conversations. I don't try to promote it because it is not a professional channel. You showed me how you use your brain. 😂🤣
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@smlanka4u:
Chandragupta and Brahamins captured Magadha, and killed Buddhist kings while Buddhist kings were trying to stop Alexander the great. Maha-Padma nanda (Porus) could be the person who tried to stop Alexander with the help of his nephew Ugrasena. But Indians don't have details about them. Greek sources and Sri Lankan sources have a lot of detail about early Magadha.
@MegaAshfire:
@smlanka4u what Buddhist kings are you on about? Porus was a Vedic king and Alexander’s army mutinied during nanda dynasty, not Mauryan. And since when did Brahmin hold weapons? clearly you are either biased or unread.
@SreedharKarunakar:
@smlanka4u Sorry, nanda kings are from eastern parts of india (modern bihar). Porus was not a nanda king.
@smlanka4u:
@SreedharKarunakar, Porus had a nephew and sons with armies. Padmananda had a nephew called Ugrasena, and he had eight sons. Ugrasena was the first Nanda king. Porus (Padma Nanda) could be a regional king because Magadha had a lot of Nanda kings.
@smlanka4u:
@MegaAshfire, Chanakya was a Brahamin and he use Chandragupta and Alexander's invation to make Magadha weak to gain the power of Brahamins again. Nanda King Dhana Nanda didn't like Brahamin Chanakya, and Buddhists reject the caste system of Brahamins. So, Brahamins could get help from Panjab (Pakistan), and western countries to invade Magadha. Also, Buddhist could speak Magadhi Prakrit and other Prakrit Languages. But Chanakaya and Hindus could use Hindi in Magadha after the invation. Also, something has happened to the people who spoke Prakrit. Chandragupta sponsored the fist Jain council, and they could develop Hinduism while Brahamanization of the existing knowledge of many different traditions.
@MegaAshfire:
@smlanka4u hai lord Vishnu. Every king had a Brahmin advisor back then. Also caste wasn’t just Brahmin invent, the whole society accepted varna system (working based on ability) , though it later devolved into caste system. Nowhere in vedas is any caste above the other. And you need to drop Buddhism don’t have caste rhetoric, it’s a blatant lie. Look at the history of Tibetan Buddhists for eg. Dhana Nanda had multiple Brahmin adviser
Also, The Buddhist tradition states that Dhana Nanda insulted the Chanakya for his ugly appearance during an alms-giving ceremony at Pupphapura (Pushpapura), ordering him to be thrown out of the assembly. Chanakya then cursed the king, who ordered his arrest. also Hindi didn’t even exist at this time. It was born around 800 AD. And back then Hindus were themselves multiple religions, of which Buddhism was one. Shaivite, vaishnavite, charvaka were different philosophies. Hinduism just became a broader identification character by Persians. Be careful with sharing incorrect information. You have been brainwashed in hate against brahmins not realising that you are participating in an attempt to beat Hinduism. You won’t.
@smlanka4u:
@MegaAshfire, You can see the Brahamanization of Buddhist knowledge and Brahamins have copied a lot of Buddhist knowledg to develop Hinduism, Mahayana, Jainism and a lot of traditions. It is the problem. Advaita Vedanta is also a copy of Buddhist teachings on non-self and emptiness, but Hindus try to say that Buddhists copied it from Hinduism. Brahamanization continued against original Buddhist teachings because original Theravada teachings have a lot of teachings against Brahamanism. So, they have tried to make a new Buddhist tradition called Mahayana. Also, they have converted a lot of Buddhist teachings and places to protect their power. It is the problem. Also, they have removed and changed a lot of details of the Buddhist history and early Buddhist kings. Still, they are actively trying to make conspiracy theories to reduce the respect to Buddhist teachings. And still, they are continuing their caste system and lies. They have used Purana texts to hide nad change history, and they continue teaching their conspiracy theories to others.
@MegaAshfire:
@smlanka4u you have no proof. MHow did Tibetan Buddhist build such an objectively evil society. Or why did singhalese Buddhist treat tamils in SL badly, similarly in burma. None of these had Brahmin influence. Your knowledge is so limited. Advaitha Vedanta was finished hundreds of years before buddha was even born. Vedas were created 1000s of years before Buddhism. Or did they travel time and steal from Buddhists🤣
@SreedharKarunakar:
@smlanka4u FYI, Porus is not mentioned in any Indian texts. He is only mentioned in Greeks books. Further, Maha padma nanda can be only found in puranas. He is not mentioned in either Buddhists or Jain books. Kindly share the sources.
@smlanka4u:
@MegaAshfire , Dr. Ambedkar converted low caste Hindus in India with the support of Sri Lanka. Also, Sri Lanka influenced a lot of countries to adopt Buddhist teachings. It could be a reason to start a war in Sri Lanka with Sinhalese and Tamils. Also, Jafna had the biggest library in Sri Lanka, and it could contain books against Hindu culture in India because a lot of Tamil Buddhists lived in Sri Lanka, and they could have written a lot of things about India and Buddhism. UNP government or some unknown powers have used Para Militaries to develop conflicts in Sri Lanka, and burnt the library in Jafna for unknown reason. And UNP was a political party of United Minorities with rich politicians, including Christian and Ex-Christian political leaders. Also, JR Jayavardhana was an Ex-Christian or he pretended to be an Ex-Christian to be a president in Sri Lanka, and he allowed to grow conflicts between Sinhalese and Tamils. And his son Ravi Jayawardhana was a Christian, and he have tried to make conflicts, and tried to use Christian powers to get the government forcefully from the Buddhist prime minister. UNP president Premadasa gave weapons to Tamil LTTE. And LTTE leader Prabhakaran didn't want to stop the war, and he cause Buddhism disappear from Northeast Sri Lanka. He forcefully used Tamil children for the war. He was a Christian, and his war continued mainly in Hindu areas. But a lot of Christian Tamils lived in western Sri Lanka. Also, Sri Lankan army and police had a lot of Christian and Ex-Christian and minories with Sinhalese because British Empire made the Army in Sri Lanka. So, they could influence to develop conflicts to stop the rapid growth of the original Buddhism intenationally. Thripitaka was written in Sri Lanka, and Sinhala language has a strong relationship to Pali and Sanskrit languages. The growth of Buddhism in India and around the world reduced the support from Sri Lanka with the conflicts in Sri Lanka. Modern world don't know much about original Buddhism because both Sri Lanka and Burma had conflicts due to their westernized armies and other powers. Vietnam and a lot of Buddhist countries faced violence of foreign armies. Some powerful countries and communities try to manipulte knowledge to reduce the power of original Buddhism because they can't easily use violence in modern times. But they use their powers to develop conflicts in many countries. Post-Vedic literature doesn't have texts older than 500 BCE, and Upanishad and a lof text have modified later. Advaita Vedanta concept is not an ultimate truth, and it could be another concept which Brahamins Brahamanized because it doesn't align with the soul concept of them.
@smlanka4u:
@SreedharKarunakar, The non-existence of details of Maha Padma nanda in early sources indicates that he was not a Hindu, and details about him could be a problem to the early Mauryan empire and Brahamins. Purana texts have tried to change the mind of common people about Maha Padma Nanda. But we can compare details about Padma Nanda and Porus to understand their similarities to know the hidden truth about Maha Padma Nanda.
@SreedharKarunakar:
@smlanka4u As requested, please share the sources instead of assumptions.
@smlanka4u:
@SreedharKarunakar, You can see the sources yourself from online sources if you want. Ugrasena was the first Nanda king, and he took Magadha kingdom from King Kalashoka according to Buddhist sources. Therefore, the name Ugrasena was not a name for Maha-Padma Nanda, and Ugrasena was Padma Nanda's nephew. They were two different people even if later developed Indian texts tried to change it. The first Nanda king Ugrasena was not a son of a king, and he was a thief according to buddhist sources. So, Porus (Padma Nanda) said that the Nanda king (Ugrasena) was despised by his subjects according to the Greek sources. The name Porus was not an Indian name. There were people with the name Ugrasena in Agra (near Punjab), and Ugrasena could come from there. Greek sources mentioned that they were attacking Agrammes (or Xandrames), and he was the ruler of the Gangaridai (the Ganges valley), whom historians identify as the Nanda king. His name sounds like Ugrasena. Alexander's soldiers faced the powerful army of Nanda But the Nanda dynasty had two kings according to the Greco-Roman tradition. Great-Padma Nanda (Porus) could come from Magadha to help Ugrasena to stop Alexander the Great if Ugrasena was from Agra (near Punjab) even if Punjab did not belong to the Nanda or Shishunaga dynasties. Porus's nephew, also called Porus/Poros in Greek sources. He ruled a territory between the Irāvatī river (in eastern India) and Asikni river (in west India). There are no reliable records about Porus in Indian texts even if Jain sources mentioned him a little indirectly. Some people have tried to develop Indian names for him later And some Indian texts have tried to say that both Ugrasena and Parashuram were names of Maha-Padma Nanda. Texts of Hinduism like Mahabharata contain tales with the names Ugrasena and Parashuram for some reasons. According to Jain texts, Nanda king (Ugrasena) was the son of a barber. According to Porus, this barber (Ugrasena’s father) killed the then king with the help of the queen, and pretended to act as a guardian, and later killed the princes (in Agra or in a nearby Kingdom). Nandiwardhana was the son of King Kalashoka. He or Mahanandin was the last Shaishunaga king. Ugrasena took the Magadha kingdom from them. Mahanandin was the father of Maha-Padma Nanda. Therefore, Maha-Padma Nanda was a Kshatriya (warriors and rulers). We can say that Ugrasena could legally become the first Nanda king because he was Padma Nanda's nephew even if he was not a son of a king. Study yourself first.
@SreedharKarunakar:
@smlanka4u my friend, with all respect, I am not interested in your story and least of all your online sources. You can let me know specific documents if you have their names. Ugrasena is mentioned in mahabharata is from mathura and was not under nandas. Nanda empire didnt even exist during mahabharata. Request you not to mix up things to make a narrative. To repeat myself again, nandas were also from magadha (modern bihar) and mathura is far from there. Also mahabharata is much older and prior to even Buddha himself.
@smlanka4u:
@SreedharKarunakar, Don't behave like a child. This is a restricted platform, and it doesn't allow sharing documents. You have to use your time to know the truth if you really want to know the truth. Don't expect to learn everything from others. Mahabharat has mentioned 6 Ugrasenas, and it could be a try to hide the details of the Ugrasena who lived in 3rd century BCE. Common people change their perception when they forget the real stories. Don't waste my time. Have a nice day.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Did JWST Images Disprove the Big Bang? Stephen C. Meyer on Joe Rogan: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zMGnwszxgY
@smlanka4u:
Galaxies older then 1 to 2 billion years exist within 300 to 500 million years after the Big Bang. What created the early galaxies faster? Poor Big Bang theorists are suffering now. True cosmology is Theravada Cosmology.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hinduism vs. Buddhism: Key Differences
@smlanka4u:
Brahamanism developed Hinduism after the rise of Brahamanism in India in 3rd century BCE, and Hindus came to India from Pakistan (Thakshila university). The early Indian spoke Prakrit language. And Pali is a written format of Prakrit.
@Hindi_Horror_Stories_219:
buddhism came to extinct after they defeated in tarka with adi sankaracharya, brahminism is only one caste of hinduism, buddha only do one yoga thats dhyan yoga out of 18 yogas described in bhagbat gita, buddha never said he created a new religion he said esa dharma sanatana, means buddhism aslo sanatana dharma like hinduism focuses on eternal truth
@smlanka4u:
@Hindi_Horror_Stories_219 , Bhagawath geetha and a lot of texts of Hinduism are not older than 500 BCE. Brahamans copied Buddhist teachings and they Brahamanized those teachings to challange Buddhist teachings and protect Brahamanism and caste system.
@Hindi_Horror_Stories_219:
@smlanka4u who taught buddha tapasya, before buddha there were lot of sages and lot of texts, in fact in tantric buddhism they worsip ganesha, by the way buddha is also not older than 500 bce, vedic ages are more than 1500 bce archeological evidences are present for you kind information, buddha is one of many sages only
@smlanka4u:
@Hindi_Horror_Stories_219 , Post-Vedic literature are not older than 500 BCE, and those texts are written in a later developed Sanskrit scripts. Brahamanization of Buddhist teachings made Hinduism and Mahayana. Also, Jainism has adopted some Buddhist stories with the help of Chandraguptha's empire. Early Buddhist culture declined with the rise of Chandraguptha's empire.
@Hindi_Horror_Stories_219:
@smlanka4u vedic textures are the foundation of hinduism not post vedic text, buddhism adopted vedic text with their own way, just say how buddha learn to do tapasya, how did he learn to meditate, he also had a guru, there were lot of sages before them, brahmanya dharma reestablished by sankaracharya after he defeated mandana mishra in tarka shastra, even in japan their tantrik buddhism worship durga, we are one bro
@smlanka4u:
@Hindi_Horror_Stories_219, Meditation and Jnana/Samadhi was not belong to Brahamins. Siddhartha Gautama developed states of Jhana before he becoming a Buddha. Also, there were 62 different beliefs during the time of the Buddha. Brahamanism was only a part of them. Vedic texts doesn't contain the unique teachings of Buddha. Your assumptions are not enough to understand the knowledge of the Buddha. You have no idea what the Buddha taught. Later developed Sanskrit texts have tried to copy teachings of him.
@Hindi_Horror_Stories_219:
@smlanka4u who tought buddha meditation, you are living in your own dream, meditation is much before siddharta, and he know only meditation one of 18 yoga, hinduism has 18 type of yogas, gyana, bhakti, karma, dhyana, sankhya etc, while buddhism has only one yoga thats dhyana, thats your knowledge, you are only one sect of hinduism
@smlanka4u:
@Hindi_Horror_Stories_219, Jhanas/Dhyanas are states of the mind, and they have some mental factors/ingredients (Cetasika). The Buddha explained the process of them in detail. Some meditators attain those states of Jhanas before the Buddha. But the Buddha explained the more details about those states of the mind, and he observed the ultimate/paramount (Paramartha) process of the mind with the help of deep Jhanas better than others. He had developed special mental faculties to observe the process of the mind very clearly. Therefore, he could explain how the mind continues from moment to moment. And then, he helped others understand the process of mind to remove the concept of soul (Sakkhaya Dhitti) to remove delusion to stop the continuation of the mind. It is not just a development of meditation. The Buddha's teachings help to understand the process of life to understand the meaninglessness (Anatta) of life.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tantra Is So Special : Get Out Of The Box | Part 3️⃣ / 3 | DJK Rinpoche On Sadhana | English Version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pmUicMG7vCc
@smlanka4u:
Material stuff and life are meaningless (Anatta), and real Buddhists (Theravadins) don't see goodness (Subha-Sangna) in those things. Fully enlightened (Arhat) monks don't feel comfortable with their lives because they can't enjoy the meaningless stuff of life.
@sloomberg:
Thanks for sharing the Hinayana view. However, according to the Pali suttas of the Theravada nikayas, the Arahants do not have the same realization as Paccekabuddhas, nor full enlightenment as Samma-sambuddhas.
@smlanka4u:
@sloomberg, All of them are Arhants, and Arhants don't have a rebirth.
@thupten5520:
What do you mean by rebirth?
@smlanka4u:
@thupten5520, Another rebirth/rebecoming (Punarbhava) is continuing the rebirths of the Citta/mind in another place due to Karma (reactions) and greed, even after the death of the existing body. The Citta/mind continues rebirths from Chittakhana/mind-moment to Chittakhana/mind-moment. The states of greed in the Citta/mind are the makers of Karma (reactions), and they cause the Citta/mind to have a rebirth in a suitable plane of existence with a suitable body.
@davidmickles5012:
That's sounds depressing.. I'd rather practice Tantra 🤣❤🙏
@smlanka4u:
@davidmickles5012, The processes of absolute realities (names/Nama and forms/Rupa) are intrinsicly depressing because of their impermanent and delusional nature.
@davidmickles5012:
@smlanka4u Maybe for you, but for me enlightenment cannot wait, too many beings need my assistance 🙏
@smlanka4u:
@davidmickles5012, The right knowledge in Theravada Doctrine can help to attain enlightenment while helping to remove misconceptions of enlightenment. We need to use right knowledge to remove false hopes, and prevent following false paths.
@davidmickles5012:
@smlanka4u ,
Oh yes! I have high respect for Therevada doctrines and I recognize that cycle of Dharma as sound and authoritative, just not the final teaching of Lord Buddha.
Om, Homage to you O'Lord, in you I take refuge for the sake of all beings 🙏🙏🙏🌺❤🍀🥀🌹
Tantra is done for the present not for the future, not for the past, it is only done for the present in the present, not for heaven, not for realms nor for a better future.
This is because the duality of time does not exist in Tantra, the duality of a self-seeking benefit or release from the past does not exist in Tantra. Only what is as your present experience exists, as the dynamic totality of the whole.
In fact, "I" as the ordinary "ego" or self does not even exist in Tantra, only the "all good" of the present exists - although it is formless and non conceptual.
Tantra vs Orthodox
I'll keep this brief because its really a much more complex and nuanced issue than I have time for now.
Orthodox "spiritual" traditions tend toward a dualistic view of reality by asserting a starting point of inferiority, of something being a problem. This is the wondrous teachings of the 4 Truths for Noble Beings.
• There is suffering
• This is the cause of suffering
• There is an end of suffering
• This is the path to end suffering
This was the First turning of the Dharma Wheel or the first "cycle" of the Buddha's teachings directed to those with the inclination of disciplined effort, chastity, restraint and progression.
Lord Buddha in his Great Compassion turned the Dharma Wheel at least 2 or 3 more times so as to appeal to those of other inclinations, attitudes and capacities. He taught of emptiness and interdependence in the 2nd Turning, he taught of the innate Buddha Nature within all beings in the 3rd Turning, and some assert a 4th Turning in which Tantra was taught. This was all done to reach past the limiting capacities and various personalities of those who sought his medicine.
And so Lord Buddha taught with great skillful means, in the First Turning of the Wheel, that there is a distant summit to reach and a gradual path to follow, in order to bring those with such inclination and capacity to a state beyond their suffering.
Tantra, also taught by Lord Buddha, begins with the opposite assertion, that reality is WHOLE-ISTIC, & that from a dualistic perspective, reality (including you) aught to be viewed as "perfect" just as is.
In a way, this could be viewed as the difference between "orthodox" teachings and un or "non-orthodox" teachings.
And so the orthodox approach is to say, "something is wrong, something is bad, something needs to be corrected" because "you are imperfect, unenlightened, and should strive for perfection" which when you really consider this is pretty negative and or depressing - at least for some. However, some others need to hear this!
The Tantric view however is the view that perfection exists within each thing and in every moment - if you would simply notice it as it really is. Of coarse, that's a monumental thing to say, and to an orthodox practitioner it would sound like "A-dharma" or "Anti-Dharma."
This is why Tantrikas (Tantra practitioners, Yogis etc) have been scorned and to some extent persecuted and denounced as "heretics" throughout history. Tantra enjoys life as it is because reality exists no where else but AS the present - regardless of its particular form.
Understand, this is not the same as "do what ever you feel like doing" because each "doing" is infused with the totality of awareness - meaning WHOLE-NESS aka "enlightenment."
This is Tantra as taught by the Lord Buddha.
• May all beings have happiness
• May all beings be free of sorrow
• May they be never separated from True happiness free of sorrow
• May they abide forever in equanimity, free of attachment, free of aversion
🙏
@smlanka4u:
@davidmickles5012, We will need enough knowledge to practice the right path. We shoudn't think that the experts in the field don't know the things we know. Some teachers pretend to be experts while copying experts.
@davidmickles5012:
@smlanka4u I wish you well on your path, it is certainly a fine path! 🙏❤
@smlanka4u:
@davidmickles5012, Finding and investigating the right knowledge is the best path. But right knowledge is more unique or complex than we think, and we try to fill the gaps of our knowledge with our imaginations. Some teachers don't know the fundamentals of their teachings, and some of them don't even know the existence of fundamental teachings. Therefore, they think that they are experts. However, I wish you all the best. 🙏
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One of the largest Buddhist temples in North America, is a local wonder worth visiting: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdsmOmxDr1Q
@smlanka4u:
Mahayana Buddhist traditions could originate from scammers in early India because India lost early Buddhist culture with the influence of other religions in India. Original Buddhism survived in Sri Lanka. Also, Thailand (Siyam) and some other countries received the well preserved original Buddhist teachings from Sri Lanka. Mahahana Buddhist countries will need to rediscover Buddhism if they really want to use original Buddhist teachings. India was an anti-Buddhist country from thousands of years.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
බුද්ධ දර්ශනයට ගැලපිලා යන රසායන විද්යාව #Hadapangoda Niwathapa thero#pahura: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W2mbp3HkL0I
@smlanka4u:
The Citta/mind is an output of matter. Matter is not an output of Citta. Matter and Citta make Chittaja Rupa/matter. Vingnana is not the Citta. All the material interactions make Vingnana while making matter, but it doesn't mean that Vingnana is always a part of a Citta with a life. Only a Citta with a potential to be a life is the mind of a living being. 🙏
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Quantum Mind: Eastern Wisdom Meets Western Science: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QyfjpGWzgTQ
@smlanka4u:
Awareness (Vingnana in Pali) emerges with interactions of matter, and it doesn't require a life, but it requires to exist matter. Also, feeling (Vedana in Pali) is a result of a contact/touch, and a feeling is an intrinsic result of a touch. The first intrinsic nature of life is greed, and greed becomes clinging (Upadana in Pali) according to the teachings on dependent origination. Non-Duality (Advaita Vedanta) is a later developed concept of Indians to copy the Non-Self teachings to get it into Brahamanism. But it doesn't align with the soul concept in Brahamanism. The priests of Brahamanism have copied a lot of teachings like that to maintain Brahamanism and caste system with the support of kings.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Buddhism in the 21st Century, a Talk by Tenzin Osel Hita at Tara Institute December 2023
अफगानिस्तान मे था सबसे खूबसूरत Buddh Vihar | Afghanistan Mein Tha sabse Khubsurat Buddha Vihara
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ashoka Buddhism Controversy Exposed | Keerthi History: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2NzkyJDhfw
@smlanka4u:
@Keerthihistory, Hindus came from Thakshila (Pakisthan), and they continued wars until the King Asoka ended the wars. They took India from early Buddhist leaders who spoke Prakrit languages. Maha Padmananda (Porus) tried to stop Alexander the great while Brahamana Chanakaya and Chandragupta killed early Indian rulers. Indians have developed new texts to promote Jainism and Hinduism with the influence of Brahamins. They could develop Mahayana teachings to ignore the original Theravada teachings because Theravada teachings don't support Brahamins. Purana texts have tried to change the history. Most probably, Asokavadana (a Sanskrit text contains versions from 5th century CE to 16th century CE) is a later developed text of Hindus. Hindus have made new stories to protect their power. Still, they are trying to change the history with their new interpretations while ignoring hard evidence.
@Shrikrishna679:
@smlanka4u don't do comedy here 😂😂 man , go and say your ridiculous things to some ignorance people
@smlanka4u:
@Shrikrishna679, Aryan/Hindus came from Northwest (Thakshila/Pakisthan) easily while Padmananda (Porus) the great was trying to stop Alexander the great near Panjab. Aryans/Hindus have taken support from western armies according to the greek sources. The greek name Porus was a name for Padmananda. But Hindus don't have detail about him, and they try call him Purushoththam. Also, Hindus try to say that Uggrasena was a name for Padmananda. But Uggrasena was Padmananda's nephew, and he took Magadha kingdom from Kalashoka. Greek sources mentioned that Porus had a nephew. Aryans/Hindus took the Magadha kindom from the people who spoke Prakrit languages, and they have destroyed a lot of details of the early Indian kings to make a new Aryan/Hindu history. But Sri Lankan texts have records about early Indian kings. Nanda dynasty had 8 regional Nanda kings. Hindu was not a religion. Hindus have developed Jain texts and Hindu texts from Indian sources to get the knowledge in early India to make a Hindu culture. And they have tried to convert the Buddha into an Avatar of Vishnu. Also, they have copied the story about Rama-Pandith in the Jataka tale to make a new Hindu story. Also, they could develop Mahayana teachings with their Sanskrit language. Original Theravada teachings survived in Sri Lanka.
@rmrrao2675:
@smlanka4u what evidence? Romilla Thapar's translations or your conversion agent propaganda?
@smlanka4u:
@rmrrao2675, You can't change history with later developed propaganda. A lot of Hindus (the people who lived near the Sindu river) have develop new texts to change the early Indian History. Don't try to ignore the major evidence to promote your Brahamanization (Pakandikaran) propaganda.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@smlanka4u:
Buddha और Jain धर्म के समकालीन Ajivik क्यों ख़त्म हो गए? | Tarikh E621: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGGqDdpWhdI
@smlanka4u:
Asokavadana is a later develoed Sanskirt text dated from 5th CE to 16th CE. The propaganda of Hindus has developed new texts to insult Buddhist leaders. Sri Lankans didn't use Sanskrit, and they didn't wrote Asokavadana. Sri Lankans use Pali and Sinhalse texts. The Sanskrit culture was an Anti-Buddhist culture from thousands of years. The early Buddhists in India used Prakrit languages, and they lost their power and people after 321 BCE. The later developed Sanskrit stories have stolen of lot of knowledge from many different cultures and knowledge systems, and those stories have tried to change the origin of knowledge.
@tahirrashid24:
@smlanka4u and then they called themselves Sudha hua Samaj
@smlanka4u:
@tahirrashid24, The later developed Sanskrit culture was not a product of Rishis, and Sanskrit knowledge could developed with the knowledge of highly educated people in universities like the Thakshila university. Still, some highly educated people in some universities write a lot of books to brainwash people to protect their societies and political powers. Sometimes, they think they can make knowledge to control common people. They didn't need proofs or real stories to write their books. It shows that unethical highly educated people in some universities can become harmful to a best knowledge systems like Theravada Buddhism if they don't have enough knowledge to recognize the value of better knowledge systems. The later developed Sanskrit culture has corrupted the origin and value of many other knowledge systems, and reduced the value of right knowledge. Some corrupted knowledge systems reduce the requirement of right knowledge because they depend on illogical beliefs a lot, and they have changed the real nature of supernatural things by making a lot of unnatural beliefs.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How Bollywood is Turning Indian Women into Toxic Feminists?
क्या बुद्ध हिन्दू थें | पाखंडियों की हालत ख़राब कर दी इस न्यूज़ ने
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Ancient Secrets To Escape The Simulation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4JA2d_Or8to
@smlanka4u:
The mind (Citta) continues due to interaction of the smallest matter unit called Rupa-Kalapa. The awareness is a result of interactions of material energy called Sankhara, and awareness is the separation and identification of matter (Rupa) and name (Nama). But awareness arises with the continuation of Citta from moment to moment in matter with or without a relationship to life. Therefore, space contains points of awareness, and a Citta with a life continues generations of awareness. It is a part of the dependent origination of life. The intrinsic nature of the five aggregates of clinging called matter/form, feeling, recognition, mental factors, and knowingness is empty.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
False Pagan Religions: Animism, Hinduism, and Buddhism - Apologetics Series - Episode 38: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yttnt93PtOw
@smlanka4u:
The concept of creator God developed from time to time, and the definitions of creator God can't make a creator God. The concept of creator God is illogical, selfish, and childish. The universe is mathematical, and I made an equation to prove the origin of the universe. It is explained in a book called verifying the origin of everything binary mathematical physics and Buddhism. It explains the origin of quantum objects and observers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Why are Christians adopting Hinduism ?: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfIXWpsjwNE
@smlanka4u:
The later developed Sanskrit texts contain teachings of Buddhism because Aryans have tried to adopt Buddhism to develop their power against the natives.
@GauravAgarwalR:
Who are aryans when did they invade/migrate/picnic in the Indian subcontinent?
@smlanka4u:
@GauravAgarwalR , It happened gradually. But they have caused disappearing Prakrit languages rapidly, causing to decline early Buddhism. The royal support for early Buddhism reduced after the end of Nanda Dynasty. But some Aryan kings supported Buddhism later. And some Aryans have done a lot of damages to Buddhism. Also, they have made a their own Buddhism (Maha/Great Yana/Vehicle) to protect their power against the power of Buddhism. Also, they have tried to hide a lot of things, and they have tried to change history with their later developed texts. They have corrupted a lot of things.
@GauravAgarwalR:
@smlanka4u oh is it? Can you put a year, a decade or a century or heck even a millennia to when such a picnic happened?
@smlanka4u:
@GauravAgarwalR, Chanakya came from Thakshila with his army while the Nanda Dynasty tried to stop the Alexander's army. It was the biggest tragedy that destroyed a lot of details about the early Buddhism, and kings. But the Sri Lankan text called Mahawamsa contains detail about early kings and invations. So, they can't hide the real history even if they tried a lot of things to hide the history. Also, greek sources have detail about the Nanda king called Porus (the greek name for Padma-Nanda), and his nephew. They have developed new texts in their universities, using other knowledge systems. Therefore, those texts don't contain knowledge of their Rishis. Their bad actions could cause destroying their universities later. Still, they are trying to hide the truth.
@GauravAgarwalR:
@smlanka4u reiterating the earlier question, can you at least put a millennia or do you need a decamillenia?
@smlanka4u:
@GauravAgarwalR , Hindus/Aryans came from Thakshila (modern Pakistan). You can't show any early Hindi texts. Prakrit was the languages of the native people.
@GauravAgarwalR:
@smlanka4u tell me when did buddhism arrive in Sinhala (Sri Lanka)? And under whose patronage?
@GauravAgarwalR:
@smlanka4u again, when? Not where! Maybe you hit your head in childhood? Can’t blame you if you had a careless mom.
@smlanka4u:
@GauravAgarwalR, The Aryan Prince Vijay invaded Sri Lanka before Buddhism came to Sri Lanka through King Asoka's son Arhat Mahinda thero, and foreign knowledge systems came to Sri Lanka from thousands of years.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BUDDHIST GANDHARAN IMAGES OF FAITH | Spirit of Asia
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Did Ashoka Convert To Buddhism Before the Kalinga War? | India Unravelled:
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/d-IR4ySJpjs
@smlanka4u:
King Asoka's inscriptions mention that he was not a Buddhist before the Kalinga war. He was continuing the wars started by Brahamins with the helps of Maurya kings. Asokavadana is a later developed Sanskrit text, and the followers of Brahamanical religions used Sanskrit texts to change history, and insult Buddhist leaders. King Asoka and other Maurya kings studied from Thakshila university, and they was following Brahamanical religions. A new book can't make new history. But Brahamins and western scholars have tried to write new books to corrupt knowledge and make new histories while stealing knowledge from other knowledge systems.
Asokavadana is a Sanskrit text dated from 5th century CE to 16th century CE. Sanskrit culture was an Anti-Buddhist culture. Sansrkit texts have tried to change history and insult Buddhist kings like Padmananda/Porus (Padma = Lotus = A Buddhist name) because they have killed the people who spoke Prakrit. The Buddha used Magadhi Prakrit. The later developed Sanskrit texts have stolen a lot of knowledge from Pali Buddhist teachings, and a lot of existing Sanskrit texts are not older than 100 BCE. Brahamins used Alexander's invation to regain their power, and they came from Punjab with the help of Alexander's army. Therefore, they have tried to develop a culture and history with their languages to take the ownership of the country.
@h.k48:
@smlanka4u brahmins are not kings Ashok he's just tyrant kshatriya.
@smlanka4u:
@h.k48, They took Magadha kindom from Kshathriyas in Nanda Dynasty. Asoka's inscriptions are older than the later developed texts. Aryans invaded India, Sri Lanka, and a lot of areas from thousands of years. The Buddhist culture in Sri Lanka started using Pali more than Sanskrit. It shows that Sanskrit was not a language of early Buddhist culture. Therefore, Sanskrit culture have made their own religions.
@laltubbsr:
@smlanka4u ashokavadana is a Buddhist text and was written to show Ashoka's spread of Buddhism (we know how) . The use of Alexander's army left in Bacteria was used by Ashoka's grandfather to gain power( yes chanakya was a Brahmin . But both Chandragupta and bimbisara were Ajivikas a Hindu sect , who both Ashoka( he exiled 1,50,000 Ajivikas on the first day of Kalinga war as bonded labourers) and even Buddha hated. So your theory that brahmins came from the north and displaced all Buddhists is wrong . Instead the opposite that Buddhism became a symbol of imperial power of Magadhans and tried to eradicate many sects such as Ajivikas, might be the more appropriate chain of events
@smlanka4u:
@laltubbsr, King Asoka didn't go to war alone, and he was a king under the influence of Brahamanical power in Magadha before the Kalinga war. Asokavadana is a part of Divyavadana series of Sanskrt texts, and they contain Anti-Buddhist teachings. As an example, "the Buddha said to draw a painting of him to show it to a king." It is not like a Buddhist teaching. Surely, Divyavadana and Asokavadana are later developed anti-Buddhist Sanskrit texts even if they contain a few true details of the history. Sanskrit culture is not a reliable culture. Early Maurya dynasty has destroyed a lot of details of the history. But we can find reliable details of early Kings like Kalashoka from Sri Lankan sources because Buddhists in India could come to Sri Lanka from time to time. Don't try to use anger to reject other knowledge systems without a good reason to reject knowledge. Some knowledge systems are much greater than other knowledge systems even if some scammers try to reduce the value of great knowledge systems.
Amit Kumar:
SO Indians, the best record keepers on this planet, never heard of Ashoka till an East India Company employee James Prinsep.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
වැඩබලන පොලිස්පතිට කාදිනල්ගෙන් නඩුවක්
@padminijayamanna1799:
කාදිනල් අපි උබ කියන කියන විදියට නටන්ඩ මොකද උබද මේ රටේ ලොක්ක,දැන් බිස්නස් වැටිලද ?
@smlanka4u:
Why suddenly the Catholic father Malcolm Ranjith tried to reduce the powers of Police while Police and spacial forces have started a special (justice) mission (Yukthiya Meheyuma) to arrest poisonous drugs dealers? Did he worry about those criminals or his supporters?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MONK's Q&A's CONDITIONS for ENLIGHTENMENT
@smlanka4u:
Enlightenment is all about removing all our addictions (Asava/Asrava) from the mind and body. It is possible. Samadhi meditations help to identify our addictions. Sadhu Sadhu Sadhu.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Group Karma: Exploring Group Identity in Buddhism
WOTM: Stop The Steal, Part II (Human Rights Violations)
शिव लिंग क्या होता है | Shiv Ling पर महिला Bauddh भिक्खुनी क्यों | Buddh Stupa को शिवलिंग बना दिया
Problems and Solutions from Buddhism - How Can We Handle Our Emotions? | Only English Version | 2/3
Buddhism path to spiritual enlightenment | Buddhism explained simply
@smlanka4u:
The utmost-meaningful (Paramartha) Truths (Sacca) are material qualities (28 Rupa), conceptual qualities (52 Cetasika), Chitta (creator/measure/force-meaning), and Nibbana (extinction).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By the way, this is not one of the sayings of Jesus the Muslim for information only.
No comments:
Post a Comment