My ideas and comments on Buddhism - Page 17



Mathematical explanation about the start of the Universe and Atoms from Mathematics Of The Universe: It gives 16 results and this unbalanced result (Higgs boson): (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) and the 16 dimensional forms in atoms called quarks, forces and etc. Imagine the start of the Universe. The Universe didn't have a distance to any direction. But the most important thing is that we don't need a distance to show directions, because the 6 directions doesn't require any existence. We usually show directions with a distance like this (If distance from my school to my house = 1Km, then Distance = 1Km and Direction = my school to my house direction): 1km-0km = 1km. But we can show the 6 directions like this too: +0-0 left, +0-0 right, +0-0 up, +0-0 down, +0-0 front, +0-0 back. So we can calculate the thinkness of the Universe like this: (+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0) = (+0-0)6 I think we can explain the birth of Matter and Antimatter mathematically. We can write gaps of 3 directions like this to calculate a solid object: (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) And we can write the gaps of all the 6 directions like 2 objects like this: (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) If you calculte those 6 virtual gaps in the Universe mathematically then you will see how the Universe make +1 distance and and -1 distance with +0.0 and -0.0. I just show the distance like this: +0-0 because it can show a direction without using a distance. I have mentioned a gap between +0 and -0, but that gap doesn't really exist, because there is no distance between it. All the 6 directions can have that +0 and -0 gaps without gaps in beginning, which just represents a direction only. But we can use those gaps to calculate 2 solid objects with three dimensions. A gap between left and right direction (+0-0) and the gap between up and down direction (+0-0) and the gap between front and back direction can make an object (like a cube). So same like that the Universe can make two objects (Matter and Antimatter) using the 6 gaps of the 6 directions, but we can calculate it mathematically to find whether it can make a distance inside those objects or not. And those two objects should be the first two solid objects in the Universe. We can calculate it same like we calculate a solid cube. But because we converted 0 into +0-0 to show directions, we can't use 0 to calculate it, so those 2 objects can have a different shape (rounded shape). (+0-0)3 x (+0-0)3 = Matter x Antimatter Do you know about this mathematical formula?: (a+b)2=a2+2ab+b2 What if the a= +0 and b= -0: (+0-0)2 = 02 - (+1-(-1)) x 0 x 0 + 02 (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3 (+1-(-1))3 = (+1)3 - ((+1)3 x (-1) - ((-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-1)2 x (+1) - ((+1)2 x (-1) - ((+1)2 x (-1)2 - ((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-1)3) The birth of 3 dimensions: i. (+1)3 ii. (-1)2 x (+1) iii. ((+1)2 x (-1) iv. (-1)3 The birth of 4 dimensions: i. (+1)3 x (-1) ii. ((-1)2 x (+1)2) iii. ((+1)2 x (-1)2 iv. ((-1)3 x (+1)) (+1-(-1))3 made those 8 dimensional forms of space with a nature of Matter and Antimatter which can cause to convert those 8 dimensional forms of space into 16 quantum dimensional forms of space like Quarks, forces and etc. According to Buddhism there are 8 quantum forms (smallest forms in empty space) called 'Suddhattaka' (Suddha = Pure, Attaka = Eight. So Suddhattaka = Pure Eight) which made Atoms and etc. So it is also sounds like as same as those 8 dimensional forms of space I mentioned above. 8 Quantum Dimensional Forms Of Empty Space = Four 3D Forms + Four 4D Forms. The Universe doesn't require a creator God. Humans created the concept of God. Everything in the Universe Is Made of Mathematics, but we just see it as a physical phenomenon. The speed of light and other constants of the Universe are just few final results which came from that mathematical calculations of the Universe. The source of Physics is pure mathematical. Real Mathematics are the creator of the Universe, and it is continuing the cyclic process of the Universe. Eg: "You can show me a Apple (1 Apple), but you don't know how to show me a minus Apple (-1 Apple) mathematically." Real mathematics are based on Directions and Dimensions. There are 6 directions, which can create upto 6 dimensions, but we are just using 4 dimensions inside 3 dimensions. 3 Dimensions are just space, and the 4th dimension becomes the time, but if there is a mathematical posibility to exist 3 Dimensions for space and 2 dimensions for time (Total 5 dimensions realm) then there will be many other types of living beings (heavenly beings). And if there is a mathematical posibility to exist 3 Dimensions for space and 3 dimensions for time (Total 6 dimensions realm) then there will be many other types of living beings (brahma beings). And if there were a mathematical posibility to exist only 3 dimensions (without a dimension for time) in the Universe then the life could not exist. And if there is a Apple (1 Apple) in that Universe then it must create a minus Apple (-1 Apple) in the opposite 3 dimensions of the Universe (Anti Universe) in order to balance the 6 dimensions which is based on the 6 directions of the Universe. But the Mathematics of the Universe just created 4 dimensions inside 3 dimensions, so we can't expect to form a minus Apple (-1 Apple) in any other dimension of the Universe, because it requires minimum extra 3 more dimensions, but our Universe already used 4 dimensions inside 3 dimensions, so there are only 2 more unknown dimensions left from the 6 main dimensions of the Universe. 'Quantum entanglement' (‘Spooky action’ builds a wormhole between ‘entangled’ particles) proved the instant connection between dimensions by changing the directions of the 'particles' (dimensional forms of space) at any distance without taking a time. So it proved the interaction between dimensions are faster than the speed of light. And the speed of light is just a final result from an interaction of dimensions. So we can use the speed of light and other constants of the Universe to find the mathematical connection with the start of the Universe to make the mathematical formula of the Universe to understand 'The Theory Of Everything'. - W. Suresh Madusanka Part 2: The Atoms From Mathematics Of The Universe. (The Theory Of Everything) I think the Universe doesn't have a -infinity (-∞), but it has a +infinity (+∞). And I think the Antimatter tried to make 3 anti space dimensions ((-1)3) against the +infinity (+∞) of the Universe with 1 space dimension (+1) to the +infinity (+∞) of the Universe. which caused to convert the 3 anti space dimensions ((-1)3) into a force against the 3 space dimensoins of Matter with -1 dimension from Matter and +1 dimension from Antimatter to the direction of the +infinity (+∞) of the Universe making space, Matter, forces and time, while causing to disappear Antimatter. Matter used +1 to make 3 dimensions and a -1 dimension from Matter and +1 dimension from Antimatter inside the 3 dimensional space against the -infinity (-∞) of the Universe which helped to make a thing (Mass/Matter) at +infinity (-∞) direction the Universe. There were a tiny unbalance of the Ratio of the Matter quarks and Antimatter quarks in the early Universe (3000000001:3000000000), and Matter is dominant in the positive/plus (+) Space, with Matter quarks which can use forced (against space) Antimatter quarks (Antimatter as Matter+Force) to make Atoms and etc. To remove quantum infinity (∞) from subatomic calculations in Quantum Physics in order to make it possible to do those calculations practically is interesting. Scientists replace quantum infinity (∞) in subatomic calculations using the 'Charge'and 'Mass' of quantum particles. I think the 'Charge' and 'Mass' is coming from few types of +1-1 dimensional formations inside atoms and etc. And if we write it like this -1, 0, +1 then we can see a gap between -1 and +1 which is equal to -+2 (-+2 is not equal to -2 or +2 because there is a zero (0) between -1 and +1). And if we write it like this 0, -1, +1 then we can see gaps with a negative/minus (-) force. The Gap between 0 and -1 is at the positive/plus (+) direction. So it shoud be equal to +1 with a -1 force ('Charge') which we can write like this '(Charge-(+1))'. So we should write this 0,-1,+1 correctly like this 0,(Charge-(+1)),+1 to write the gap between 0 and +1 with the extra gap ('(Charge-(+1))= Charge - (+1 gap)') which is equal to +2 at the positive/plus (+) direction (Dimensional Mathematics of the Universe start both -1 and +1 from 0 to the positive/plus (+) direction making a +2 Gap (Mass) with a -Force (Charge) from 0, -1, +1 interactions). According to the Standard Model in particle physics, there are six different types of leptons. These include the Electron, the Muon, and Tau particles, as well as their associated neutrinos (i.e. electron neutrino, muon neutrino, and tau neutrino). Lepton Type | Mass (Mev): Electron | 0.511 Muon | 106 Tau | 1777 I can see a mathematical connection between the Mass off Electron, Muon and Tau. If we round the Mass of those leptons, we can write it like this too: Lepton Type | Mass (Mev): Tau | (0.5+0.5) x 2000 = 2000 (around 1777) Muon | 0.5 x 200 = 100 (around 106) Electron | 0.5 (around 0.511) So, if we use those numbers for the Mass of those leptons (Mass (Mev) Around: 2000 = Tau | 100 = Muon | 0.5 = Electron), then we can guess that mathematical connection like this: Tau : Muon : Electron = 2000 : 100 : 0.5 = 4000 : 200 : 1 Mass of the Muon = (Mass of the Tau)/20 Mass of the Electron = (Mass of the Muon)/200 If the mathematical connection = 20:200, then the next posibility is 200:2000. And there is another mathematical connection. If there are both +1 and -1, then -Tau : -Muon : -Electron = -4000 : -200 : -1, or we can try to convert it like this: -Electron : -Muon : -Tau = 0.1/100 : 0.2/10000 : 0.4/100000 (*I just tried to put -1 (antimatter) into 0.0 as 0.1 (or 0.099)) So we can use those mathematical connections to guess an existence of another lepton ('X' Lepton) like this: Mass of the 'X' Lepton = (Mass of the Electron)/2000 So, the Mass (Mev) of the 'X' Lepton = 0.5/2000 = 0.00025 Because the Mass (Mev) of the 'X' Lepton 0.00025 is less than 0.1 we should apply few more mathematics to bring it to the side of the -1. If -Electron : -Muon : -Tau = 0.1/100 : 0.2/1000 : 0.4/1000 then, in order to make the 'X' Lepton an antimatter lepton we should divide it from 100. Then, The Mass (Mev) of the 'X' Lepton = 0.00025/100 = 0.0000025 According to my mathematical calculations the Mass of the 'X' Lepton 0.0000025 (Mev) is nearly equal to the mass of the Electron Neutrino which is equal to around 0.000003 (Mev). If the Mass of the 'Y' Lepton = (Mass of the Muon)/(Mass of the Electron) So, the Mass (Mev) of the 'Y' Lepton = 100/0.5 = 200 Because the 'X' Lepton (Antimatter Lepton) is at the opposite direction (-1 or 0.1 (0.099)) there is a possibility to create more leptons to that directoin to balance the formation of leptons. And we should apply some mathematics (antimatter mathematics) to bring it to the side of the -1 or 0.1. If -Electron : -Muon : -Tau = 0.1/100 : 0.2/1000 : 0.4/1000 then, in order to make the 'Y' Lepton an antimatter lepton we should divide it from 1000. Then, The Mass (Mev) of the 'Y' Lepton = 200/1000 = 0.2 According to my mathematical calculations the Mass of the 'Y' Lepton 0.2 (Mev) is nearly equal to the mass of the Muon Neutrino which is equal to around 0.19 (Mev). According to my mathematical calculations the Universe can make two objects (Matter and Antimatter) using the 6 gaps of the 6 directions: (+0-0)3 x (+0-0)3 = Matter x Antimatter According to this mathematical formula (a+b)2=a2+2ab+b2 we can write (+0-0)2 as 02 - (+1-(-1)) x 0 x 0 + 02 (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3 (+1-(-1))3 can make 8 dimensional forms of space with a nature of Matter and Antimatter which can cause to convert those 8 dimensional forms of space into 16 quantum dimensional forms of space like Quarks, forces and etc. According to Buddhism Suddhāṭṭhaka (“suddha” for “pure” or fundamental” + “āṭṭha” or “eight”) means a unit of matter consisting of eight fundamental entities. Four of these are the “satara mahā bhūta“ (The Four Great Bhūta. Bhūta is another name for “ghost” because of their elusive nature.): Pathavi (Solid/Earth), āpo (Liquid/Water), tejo (Heat/Fire), vāyo (Gas/Air). These are indeed the most fundamental units of matter, but they cannot be detected by themselves. The four mahā bhūta ('Matter') are with four basic “gati” ('Character of Matter'/ 'Antimatter'): Pathavi gati (hard/coarse), āpo gati (bound/attracted/liquidity), tejo gati (fiery or energetic), vāyo gati (motion). Thus, in Buddha Dhamma, it says, “gati (character) attracts a similar gati”. (*Read more about "The Origin of Matter – Suddhāṭṭhaka" at Pure Dhamma website.) (+0.0-0.0)3 can make extra dimensions, Higgs boson and etc. Possible or Probable Outputs of (+0.0-0.0)3 (+0.0-0.0)3 = (+0.0-0.0)x(+0.0-0.0)x(+0.0-0.0) The Most Possible Output: (+0.0-0.0)3 = (0.02 - (+1-(-1)) x 0.0 x 0.0 + 0.02)x(+0.0-0.0) = ((+1-(-1)) x 0.000 - (+1-(-1)) x 0.000)x(+0.0-0.0) = ((+1-(-1)) x (0.000 - 0.000))x(+0.0-0.0) (+0.0-0.0)3 = ((+1-(-1)) x (0.000 - 0.000)) x (+0.0-0.0) I write it like this for identification: (+0.0-0.0)3 = (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) Now we can combine the results of (+0.0-0.0)3 with the results of (+1-(-1))3 to see the most possible total result: (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3 = (+ (+1)3 - ((+1)3 x (-1) - ((-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-1)2 x (+1) - (+ (+1)2 x (-1) - ((+1)2 x (-1)2 - ((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-1)3)) x (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3 = (+ (+(1))(+1)3 - ((+(1))(+1)3 x (-1) - ((+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (+(1))(-1)2 x (+1) - (+ (+(1))(+1)2 x (-1) - (+(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2 - (+(1))((-1)3 x (+1))) + (+(1))(-1)3) - (+ (-(1))(+1)3 - ((-(1))(+1)3 x (-1) - ((-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-(1))(-1)2 x (+1) - (+ (-(1))(+1)2 x (-1) - (-(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2 - (-(1))((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-(1))(-1)3))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) It gives 16 results and this unbalanced result (Higgs boson): (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) Now I can show all the most possible results (the 16 dimensional forms in atoms called quarks, forces and etc) like this: Distance of Directions in beginning of the Universe: (+0-0)6 = i: (+1-(-1))3 ii: (+0.0-0.0)3 = ( This should be the Pure Eight (Pali: Suddhātthaka) in Buddhism: Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas, Character (Pali: Gati) Of Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas) A: + (+1)3 B: - ((+1)3 x (-1) C: - ((-1)2 x (+1)2)) D: + (-1)2 x (+1) - ( E: + (+1)2 x (-1) F: - ((+1)2 x (-1)2 G: - ((-1)3 x (+1))) H: + (-1)3) )) x ii: (+0.0-0.0)3 = ( This should be the 12 elementary particles (of matter) and 4 basic forces in Standard Model (in particle physics). 12 Elementary particles: (6 quarks:) up, charm, top, Down, Strange, Bottom and (3 electrons:) electron, muon, tau and (three neutrinos:) e, muon, tau. And 4 basic forces: the gravitational force, the electromagnetic force, the weak nuclear force, and the strong nuclear force. 01: + (+(1))(+1)3 02: - ((+(1))(+1)3 x (-1) 03: - ((+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2)) 04: + (+(1))(-1)2 x (+1) - ( 05: + (+(1))(+1)2 x (-1) 06: - (+(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2 07: - (+(1))((-1)3 x (+1))) 08: + (+(1))(-1)3 ) - ( 09: + (-(1))(+1)3 10: - ((-(1))(+1)3 x (-1) 11: - ((-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2)) 12: + (-(1))(-1)2 x (+1) - ( 13: + (-(1))(+1)2 x (-1) 14: - (-(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2 15: - (-(1))((-1)3 x (+1))) 16: + (-(1))(-1)3)) ))) x This should be the Higgs boson in Standard Model (in particle physics): 17: (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) Each electron has an electrical charge of -1. Quarks make up protons and neutrons, which, in turn, make up an atom's nucleus. Each proton and each neutron contains three quarks. The Higgs boson field came from this: (+0.0-0.0)3 And this (+0.0-0.0)3 is combined to this: (+1-(-1))3 So always there is an interaction between the final resultS of this: (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3 with this (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) which can make a mathematical connection between those things. (Eg: Tau : Muon : Electron = 2000 : 100 : 0.5 = 4000 : 200 : 1) The reason to the birth of Atoms is the reason to The Origin of Matter and Antimatter. And it is the first part of 'The Theory Of Everything'. - W. Suresh Madusanka (The founder of that mathematical explanation about the start of the Universe and Atoms.)

Scott Hoogerhyde Thumbs up, even though I didn't entirely understand it.
1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rob Turner Admin note: i approved this post as it was interesting even though it doesnt have a 2 sentence minimum introduction. please could the OP edit the post?
1
  • Like
  • Reply
  • 2h
  • Suresh Fxtrader Wanayalae Ok, I'll add this to the beginning:
    Mathematical explanation about the start of the Universe and Atoms from Mathematics Of The Universe. It gives 16 results and this unbalanced result (Higgs boson): (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) and the 16 dimensional forms in atoms called quarks, forces and etc.
  • Jason Mills Science: Let’s organize everything in existence.

    Also science: Lets name all the quantum particles as confusingly as possible.
    1
  • Marius Maknetti I'm all for pure mathematics producing the quantitative experimental numbers of the sciences in a non-arbitrary manner. Along with simplification and a reduction in the number of different parameters, this is the sign that we're on to something. So tell me, how do Planck's constant and the speed of light in a vacuum appear naturally from this 'mathematics'? Where does this stuff produce the so-called 'fundamental' constants like the fine structure constant, or any of the masses of the putative entities of the 'standard model'. How does it answer any of the outstanding questions of modern physics, like: why are there fermions and bosons, why and what is spin, why is electromagnetism repulsive and attractive but gravitation is only attractive, what is the true nature of wave-particle duality, why is the universe manifested in terms of such distinct characteristics like light and matter, and most importantly: having failed to solve any of these puzzles, why would physicists use up huge amounts of money and resources to launch themselves into discovering/inventing the enormous number of new parameters of the dead-end of the particle physics zoo none of which their models produce the properties of, in the manner of Ptolemaic astronomers creating epicycles, and then tell themselves that they were engaged in fundamental work in physics?
    1
    • Love
    • Reply
    • 30m
    • Suresh Fxtrader Wanayalae That is my next step. I'm analysing it. I'll try to give good answers for your questions, step by step within few days (maybe within few weeks). But I'll try to give a quick answer within few hours.
      • Reply
      • (Wednsday, July 8, 2020 at 9:57 PM)
    • Suresh Fxtrader Wanayalae There are few levels in my mathematical calculations, which I have separated using brackets '()' and etc, so it shows a structure, but currently it doesn't explain that whether it has a fixed size for the structure or not, and it can be a series of structures which caused to make many different types of atoms and etc. And maybe there are more series of constants which we haven't discovered yet. So it is not only about the constants we know, but also maybe there are more vibrations in slightly different dimensions which we can't measure using the vibrations of our dimension. Vibrations don't have a Mass, and dimensions give Mass to Vibrations, so if there are vibrations in a different dimension, then we can't capture the Mass and Charge of those Particles (If we are not using a dimensional vibration from the 6 main dimensions.), and I'm not only talking about an invisible particle, but also maybe there are hidden Mass and Charge in our particles in a different dimension. So it is not easy to deal only with some Units in our dimension, because the foundation of the universe doesn't have those units. So, in order to combine my mathematical explanations with our Units we have to make a mathematical formula (with our physics) which can convert some units and constants into something else like a ratio or something like that which can help us to remove the Units to use it with my mathematical explanation. However, currently I don't have enough time to think about it more. I'm usually busy with few other subjects too. I don't have any connection to any research about science or mathematics. I just think about these type of things personally. However, I'll think about it later and let you know more about it. And I'll try to find most suitable answers for your questions. Thank you so much for your profound questions.
      • Reply
      • 1m
      •   (Thursday, July 9, 2020 at 12:50 AM)

    • Suresh Ranrahas Forexsigs I think I found it, but still it is in my mind, because I made that mathematical formula few minutes ago from my mind using this (+0-0)6 = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3 mathematical formula. And I didn't even start to write it on any note book yet to solve it to get the final result from it. Maybe it will be very difficult to solve that mathematical formula to find the speed of light from it, because it is a big mathematical formula which is based on the standard model in particle physics. I'll tell you more about it when I decide to publish it. However, currently I don't know whether it will give me the correct speed of light or not.
      • Reply
      • 5m (Saturday, July 11, 2020 at 9:19 PM)


Joshua Wood-Rich So... The “Special Theory About the Birth of Atoms” is TL:DR Zero = Zero
🤨
1
  • Haha
  • Reply
  • 1m
  • Suresh Fxtrader Wanayalae It sounds like that, but it continues.
    (+0-0)6 = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3
    • Joshua Wood-Rich (+0-0)6 = (+0-0) = 0
      0*6 = 0
      =

      (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3 = (+1-(-1) = 1+1 = 2
      2*3 = 6 *
      (+0.0-0.0)3 = 0*3 = 0
      6*0=0

      Ergo
      0=0
    • Suresh Fxtrader Wanayalae Joshua Wood-Rich , (+0-0)6 = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3

      (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) = (+1-(-1)) x (+1-(-1)) x (+1-(-1)) x (+0.0-0.0) x (+0.0-0.0) x (+0.0-0.0)
    • Joshua Wood-Rich Suresh 0=0 🤷🏽‍♂️
      Where’s the revelation..?
    • Suresh Fxtrader Wanayalae Joshua Wood-Rich , (+0-0)6 = (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0)
      (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) = Up x Down x Front x x Back x Left x Right.


      Do you think, Up = Down = Front = Back = Left = Right?
      That is why, (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) is not equal to 0.
    • Joshua Wood-Rich Suresh x, y, & z = 0
      All can be equal to zero.
      None of this moves from zero.
    • Suresh Fxtrader Wanayalae Joshua Wood-Rich , You are talking about line mathematics, I'm talking about 3 dimensional mathematics. I don't use 0 for calcualtions, because there is no 0 without a relative direction, in reality. in order to make 0 a relative thing, we should write it like this +0-0. There are 6 different types of +0-0 for each direction. Then we can calculate the thinkness of the universe like this: (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0)
    • Joshua Wood-Rich Suresh can you tell me how x, y, z are not 3 dimensional..?
    • Joshua Wood-Rich Suresh also, how is an atom possible without at least a 4th dimension?
    • Suresh Fxtrader Wanayalae Joshua Wood-Rich , In line mathematics, x = 0, y = 0, z = 0. But in 3 dimensional mathematics x = +0-0, y = +0-0, z = +0-0. Because if you show a line you should show a direction like -1 or +1, and in line mathematics we don't show a direction when we write 0. but it doesn't mean that 0 doesn't have a relative direction. So the line mathematics we usually use is not the real mathematics. Real mathematics should show directions of 0 too.

      There are space for 6 dimensions because of the 6 directons of the Universe. I have explained how (+1-(-1))3 dimensions combined and make 8 dimensional formations including 4 dimensional forms with 3 dimensions and 4 dimensional forms with 4 dimensions. And then a 5th dimension (+1-(-1)) from this (+0.0-0.0)3 with a strange field (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) which caused to form the 6 quarks, 6 leptons, 4 forces and a strange Higgs boson in standard model in particle physics.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Meszaros NO MANIFESTOS, DUDE.
1
  • Suresh Fxtrader Wanayalae The Universe started from 0 with infinity of directions. In line mathematics, x = 0, y = 0, z = 0. But in 3 dimensional mathematics x = +0-0, y = +0-0, z = +0-0. Because if you show a line you should show a direction like -1 or +1, and in line mathematics we don't show a direction when we write 0. but it doesn't mean that 0 doesn't have a relative direction. So the line mathematics we usually use is not the real mathematics. Real mathematics should show directions of 0 too.
    There are space for 6 dimensions because of the 6 directons of the Universe. I have explained how (+1-(-1))3 dimensions combined and make 8 dimensional formations including 4 dimensional forms with 3 dimensions and 4 dimensional forms with 4 dimensions. And then a 5th dimension (+1-(-1)) from this (+0.0-0.0)3 with a strange field (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) which caused to form the 6 quarks, 6 leptons, 4 forces and a strange Higgs boson in standard model in particle physics.

Paul Entrekin lol. zero times zero is zero on both sides. All this proves is idiocy
  • Paul Entrekin ah, so now the epic failure of your post reveals itself. This is an atheist vs theist page. not a math page. This has nothing at all to do with us here. You can leave now
  • Suresh Fxtrader Wanayalae Paul Entrekin , You haven't mentioned how I failed. I have proved that we don't need a God create the 17 subatomic particles in standard model in particle physics.
  • Paul Entrekin Suresh Fxtrader Wanayalae yes i did. you fail to post anything relevant to atheism or theism. you don't have to pore or disprove a god. god concepts are all fictional and thus are not even considered to be real
  • Suresh Fxtrader Wanayalae Paul Entrekin , If you take time to read my explanation you will see how I have proved how the Atoms form from dimensions. It support Athiesm, but stupid people like you can't understand it..
  • Paul Entrekin Suresh Fxtrader Wanayalae okay, so now you are just proving you are here to insult us. Fu*ck you as*shole. IT DOESN'T support atheism, because , as I said already, we don't have to disprove a claim with no evidence. all god concepts are proven fiction. science doesn't have to , no can it, disprove a fictional claim, so you are obviously a total IDIOT. lol
  • Suresh Fxtrader Wanayalae Paul Entrekin , I can understand what you say. You are intelligent enough to understand it, but stupid believers need an explanation to the existence of Atoms to stop believing a God.
  • Paul Entrekin Suresh Fxtrader Wanayalae nope. believers do not use facts or critical thinking to reach their conclusion, so all the facts in the world are not going to change their mind. you have to show them the fallacies in their position and eventually, if they are honest at all with themselves, they have to admit that their position is flawed. many are not that honest, though. Also, making an argument in physics is only going to apply to physicists, which is why I said it is totally out of place here.
  • Suresh Fxtrader Wanayalae Paul Entrekin , I can understand you. However, I don't know why an admin of this page approved my post, or maybe I happened automatically. However, I think it is relevent, so I'll not remove it. I have enough qualifications. And it doesn't require a big knowledge about mathematics. I didn't tell you anyone to calculate anything, I'm not a scientist or someone like that, that is why I posted it to here to help someone to disprove my explanation before I show it to mathematicians and scientists. And intelligent people of some groups liked it, but I don't know why athiests behave like idiots,

Michael Meszaros First, YOUR idea was stolen from the standard model so YOUR IDEA didn't create SHIT. Second, take this to a math page where they will probably tear you to shreds. We don't argue math here, we argue atheism, FOOL. Leave, and take this with you. Capisce?
  • Michael Meszaros Or we can MAKE you leave, if you prefer.
  • Suresh Fxtrader Wanayalae Michael Meszaros , I have provided very simple mathematics which anyone can understand. If you take time to read my explanation you will see how I have proved how the Atoms form from dimensions. It support Athiesm, but stupid people like you can't understand it..
  • Michael Meszaros WHO FU*CKIN' CARES, take it to a math page and show them the Nobel Prize that you got for your work. And, you are a Doctor of WHAT, exactly?
  • Suresh Fxtrader Wanayalae Michael Meszaros , I have enough qualifications. And it doesn't require a big knowledge about mathematics. I didn't tell you anyone to calculate anything, I'm not a scientist or someone like that, that is why I posted it to here to help someone to disprove my explanation before I show it to mathematicians and scientists. And intelligent people of some groups liked it, but I don't know why athiests behave like idiots,
Michael Meszaros OP has been reported for breaking group rules... BYE, FELICIA.
  • Suresh Fxtrader Wanayalae I don't know why an admin of this page approved my post, or maybe it happened automatically. However, I think it is relevent, so I'll not remove it. I think you are a control freak. That is why you want to control other people.

    • Michael Meszaros As the moderator ex officio of THIS PAGE, I give good advise to people to keep them from getting in trouble. You have been told numerous times that this is not the page for your post. NOW, you're getting insulting. So, are you just a troll that won't shut up AND you want suicide by moderator? Will being a martyr make you feel good? If you want to ARGUE with people, start with your parents, for that name they gave you ... yeah.
    • Suresh Fxtrader Wanayalae However, I posted this conversation to my blog: https://buddhist-essentials-and-concepts.blogspot.com/...
      I want to show that there are stupid athiests who ignore and hide important things from others. If the mathematical knowledge is the problem, then what about other knowledges atheists talk in this group. Everythings is knowledge.. However, my post prove that theists don't need a God to create atoms too.
      My ideas and comments on Buddhism - Page 17
      BUDDHIST-ESSENTIALS-AND-CONCEPTS.BLOGSPOT.COM
      My ideas and comments on Buddhism - Page 17
      My ideas and comments on Buddhism - Page 17



---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Do we need a Theory of Everything?


Sabine Hossenfelder:
I get constantly asked if I could please comment on other people’s theories of everything. That could be Garrett Lisi’s E8 theory or Eric Weinstein’s geometric unity or Stephen Wolfram’s idea that the universe is but a big graph, and so on. First I explain what physicists mean by a theory of everything and by grand unification (or a grand unified theory, respectively). Then I explain why the current approaches are no very promising but why, forgive me, I nevertheless think it's good to have them.


KeF:
This why I love your channel , you don't just accept things and you are very critical of the state of today's physics . That's the mentality needed , if we are to keep going forward in the advancement of physics . And yes the universe doesnt give a damn ,what we want or what we think as pretty . It is what is it .

Suresh Madusanka:
I like the video so much, but I have a theory of everything too.
According to Buddhism Suddhāṭṭhaka (“suddha” for “pure” or fundamental” + “āṭṭha” or “eight”) means  a unit of matter consisting of eight fundamental entities. Four of these are the “satara mahā bhūta“ (The Four Great Bhūta. Bhūta is another name for “ghost” because of their elusive nature.): Pathavi (Solid/Earth), āpo (Liquid/Water), tejo (Heat/Fire), vāyo (Gas/Air). These are indeed the most fundamental units of matter, but they cannot be detected by themselves. The four mahā bhūta ('Matter') are with four basic “gati” ('Character of Matter'/ 'Antimatter'): Pathavi gati (hard/coarse), āpo gati (bound/attracted/liquidity), tejo gati (fiery or energetic), vāyo gati (motion). Thus, in Buddha Dhamma, it says, “gati (character) attracts a similar gati”. (*Read more about "The Origin of Matter – Suddhāṭṭhaka" at Pure Dhamma website.)

According to my mathematical calculations the Universe can make two objects (Matter and Antimatter) using the 6 gaps of the 6 directions:
(+0-0)3 x (+0-0)3 = Matter x Antimatter


According to this mathematical formula (a+b)2=a2+2ab+b2 we can write (+0-0)2 as 02 - (+1-(-1)) x 0 x 0 + 02


(+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0)  =  (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3


(+1-(-1))3 can make 8 dimensional forms of space with a nature of Matter and Antimatter which can cause to convert those 8 dimensional forms of space into 16 quantum dimensional forms of space like Quarks, forces and etc.

(+0.0-0.0)3 can make extra dimensions, Higgs boson and etc.


Possible or Probable Outputs of (+0.0-0.0)3 

(+0.0-0.0)3 = (+0.0-0.0)x(+0.0-0.0)x(+0.0-0.0)

The Most Possible Output:
(+0.0-0.0)3
= (0.02 - (+1-(-1)) x 0.0 x 0.0 + 0.02)x(+0.0-0.0)
= ((+1-(-1)) x 0.000 - (+1-(-1)) x 0.000)x(+0.0-0.0)
= ((+1-(-1)) x (0.000 - 0.000))x(+0.0-0.0)

(+0.0-0.0)3 = ((+1-(-1)) x (0.000 - 0.000)) x (+0.0-0.0)

I write it like this for identification:

(+0.0-0.0)3 = (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)

Now we can combine the results of (+0.0-0.0)3 with the results of (+1-(-1))3 to see the most possible total result:

(+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3 =
(+ (+1)3 - ((+1)3 x (-1) - ((-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-1)2 x (+1)
- (+ (+1)2 x (-1) - ((+1)2 x (-1)2 - ((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-1)3)) 
x (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)

(+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3 = 
(+ (+(1))(+1)3 - ((+(1))(+1)3 x (-1) - ((+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (+ (+(1))(+1)2 x (-1) - (+(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2 - (+(1))((-1)3 x (+1))) + (+(1))(-1)3)
- (+ (-(1))(+1)3 - ((-(1))(+1)3 x (-1) - ((-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (+ (-(1))(+1)2 x (-1) - (-(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2 - (-(1))((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-(1))(-1)3)))
x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)

It gives 16 results and this unbalanced result (Higgs boson): (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)

Now I can show all the most possible results (the 16 dimensional forms in atoms called quarks, forces and etc) like this:

Distance of Directions in beginning of the Universe: (+0-0)6 

i: (+1-(-1))3

ii: (+0.0-0.0)3
= ( This should be the Pure Eight (Pali: Suddhātthaka) in Buddhism: Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas, Character (Pali: Gati) Of Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas)
A: + (+1)3
B: - ((+1)3 x (-1)
C: - ((-1)2 x (+1)2))
D: + (-1)2 x (+1)
- (
E: + (+1)2 x (-1)
F: - ((+1)2 x (-1)2
G: - ((-1)3 x (+1)))
H: + (-1)3)
)) x
ii: (+0.0-0.0)3
= ( This should be the 12 elementary particles (of matter) and 4 basic forces in Standard Model (in particle physics). 12 Elementary particles: (6 quarks:) up, charm, top, Down, Strange, Bottom and (3 electrons:) electron, muon, tau and (three neutrinos:) e, muon, tau. And 4 basic forces: the gravitational force, the electromagnetic force, the weak nuclear force, and the strong nuclear force.
01: + (+(1))(+1)3
02: - ((+(1))(+1)3 x (-1)
03: - ((+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2))
04: + (+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (
05: + (+(1))(+1)2 x (-1)
06: - (+(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2
07: - (+(1))((-1)3 x (+1)))
08: + (+(1))(-1)3
)
- (
09: + (-(1))(+1)3
10: - ((-(1))(+1)3 x (-1)
11: - ((-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2))
12: + (-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (
13: + (-(1))(+1)2 x (-1)
14: - (-(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2
15: - (-(1))((-1)3 x (+1)))
16: + (-(1))(-1)3))
))) x 

This should be the Higgs boson in Standard Model (in particle physics):
17: (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)

Each electron has an electrical charge of -1. Quarks make up protons and neutrons, which, in turn, make up an atom's nucleus. Each proton and each neutron contains three quarks.

The Higgs boson field came from this: (+0.0-0.0)3
And this (+0.0-0.0)3 is combined to this: (+1-(-1))3
So always there is an interaction between the final resultS of this: (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3 with this (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) which can make a mathematical connection between those things. (Eg: Tau : Muon : Electron = 2000 : 100 : 0.5 = 4000 : 200 : 1)

The reason to the birth of Atoms is the reason to The Origin of Matter and Antimatter. And it is the first part of 'The Theory Of Everything'.

- W. Suresh Madusanka

(The founder of that mathematical explanation about the start of the Universe and Atoms.)


rv706:
@Suresh Madusanka: Your theory definitely needs to be heard. By a psychiatrist.

Suresh Madusanka:
@rv706 ,  There are space for 6 dimensions because of the 6 directons of the Universe. I have explained how (+1-(-1))3 dimensions combined and make 8 dimensional formations including 4 dimensional forms with 3 dimensions and 4 dimensional forms with 4 dimensions. And then a 5th dimension (+1-(-1)) from this (+0.0-0.0)3 with a strange field (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) which caused to form the 6 quarks, 6 leptons, 4 forces and a strange Higgs boson in standard model in particle physics.
The Universe started from 0 with infinity of directions. In line mathematics, x = 0, y = 0, z = 0. But in 3 dimensional mathematics x = +0-0, y = +0-0, z = +0-0. Because if you show a line you should show a direction like -1 or +1, and in line mathematics we don't show a direction when we write 0. but it doesn't mean that 0 doesn't have a relative direction. So the line mathematics we usually use is not the real mathematics. Real mathematics should show directions of 0 too.

Jake Givein:
@Suresh Madusanka You should first read a textbook like Mathematical Methods by Boas to learn some vector analysis and coordinate systems. That will prevent you from saying stupid stuff like that and will improve your understanding of physics.

Suresh Madusanka:
@Jake Givein, Our common knowledge about mathematics don't help us to make that calculation, because if we use a normal calculator to multiply 0 from a 0 then the result it shows is 0 ( wrong mathematics: 0x0 = 0), but in the reality if we multiply 0 from a 0 (mathematically: 0x0), then the result should be 0.0 (mathematically: 0x0 = 0.0). There is a big difference between 0 and 0.0 (Null). Real mathematics can show how forms can come from nothing (without a distance (0 distance = +0-0)) and from the infinity of the 6 directions.
Imagine the start of the Universe. The Universe didn't have a distance to any direction. But the most important thing is that we don't need a distance to show directions, because the 6 directions doesn't require any existence. We usually show directions with a distance like this (If distance from my school to my house = 1Km, then Distance = 1Km and Direction = my school to my house direction): 1km-0km = 1km. But we can show the 6 directions like this too: +0-0 left, +0-0 right, +0-0 up, +0-0 down, +0-0 front, +0-0 back. So we can calculate the thinkness of the Universe like this: (+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0) = (+0-0)6
I think we can explain the birth of Matter and Antimatter mathematically.
We can write gaps of 3 directions like this to calculate a solid object: (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0)
And we can write the gaps of all the 6 directions like 2 objects like this: (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0)
If you calculte those 6 virtual gaps in the Universe mathematically then you will see how the Universe make +1 distance and and -1 distance with +0.0 and -0.0.
I just show the distance like this: +0-0 because it can show a direction without using a distance. I have mentioned a gap between +0 and -0, but that gap doesn't really exist, because there no distance between it. All the 6 directions can have that +0 and -0 gaps without gaps in beginning, which just represents a direction only. But we can use those gaps to calculate 2 solid objects with three dimensions. A gap between left and right direction (+0-0) and the gap between up and down direction (+0-0) and the gap between front and back direction can make an object (like a cube). So same like that the Universe can make two objects (Matter and Antimatter) using the 6 gaps of the 6 directions, but we can calculate it mathematically to find whether it can make a distance inside those objects or not. And those two objects should be the first two solid objects in the Universe. We can calculate it same like we calculate a solid cube. But because we converted 0 into +0-0 to show directions, we can't use 0 to calculate it, so those 2 objects can have a different shape (rounded shape).
(+0-0)3 x (+0-0)3 = Matter x Antimatter

Jake Givein:
@Suresh Madusanka You should put that in a paper and send it to a journal. I'm sure they'll enjoy the entertainment. 

In the meantime you should add differential calculus and introductory quantum mechanics to my list of pointers. Otherwise your knowledge will remain the same as your favourite number: 0.

Suresh Madusanka:
​@Jake Givein  , I'm making another mathematical formula from this (+0-0)6 = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3 mathematical formula. And then I'll solve it to get the final result from it. I'm going to use my new mathematical formula with the MASS of the particles in standard model  to find the speed of light or something like that. Maybe it will be very difficult to solve that mathematical formula to find the speed of light from it, because it is a big mathematical formula which is based on the standard model in particle physics. However, currently I don't know whether it will give me the correct speed of light or not.
I didn't know about the standard model in particle physics when I started to make that calculation around 2 years ago. I just received 8 dimensional formations from it in the beginning, but few weeks ago I just continued that calculation to get the final result, and then I found another dimension (MASS dimension) from it which converted it into 16 dimensional formations with another things (Higgs boson). There are 17 things in the standard model too. However, I'm not a scientist or someone like that, that is why I posted it to here to help someone to disprove my explanation before I show it to mathematicians and scientists.
Thank you for your advice.


Jake Givein:
@Suresh Madusanka Look I'm sure you think you've discovered something here. But what you wrote doesn't mean anything. It's just word salad. If you are interested in fundamental physics and toe's you are going to have to study physics and maths first for ten years or more just to get started. It really takes that long to understand what is already known so you known what needs to be explained next. If you do not have access to a university education you are going to have to read and work through a lot of books. You can find lectures on Youtube, books on Library Genesis and papers on Sci-hub.

Suresh Madusanka:
​@Jake Givein , If you don't think that a theory of everything can be a simpIe theory, it is fine, and I can understand you. I hope you checked my first comment which I explained my theory.. (I didn't send it to you.). You can find my theory and conversations from here too: http://buddhist-essentials-and-concepts.blogspot.com/p/my-ideas-and-comments-on-buddhism-page_7.html
Thank you so much for your time and advice.


norman ndaba:
Suresh Madusanka what are you waiting for sir ? Submit a paper to be reviewed by your peers and get this over and done with pronto !

Suresh Madusanka:
@norman ndaba ,  I'm waiting till I find the speed of light or something like that from a development of it. Sometimes people ignore the cause until they see the effect.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Atom- The Illusion Of Reality (Jim Al-Khalili) - Science Documentary - Reel Truth Science


--------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Theory of Everything Livestreams with Amazing Guests - PBS Space Time



Suresh Madusanka:
If you are interested about theories of everything. You can check my theory too:

Distance of Directions in beginning of the Universe: (+0-0)6 

i: (+1-(-1))3

ii: (+0.0-0.0)3
= ( This should be the Pure Eight (Pali: Suddhātthaka) in Buddhism: Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas, Character (Pali: Gati) Of Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas)
A: + (+1)3
B: - ((+1)3 x (-1)
C: - ((-1)2 x (+1)2))
D: + (-1)2 x (+1)
- (
E: + (+1)2 x (-1)
F: - ((+1)2 x (-1)2
G: - ((-1)3 x (+1)))
H: + (-1)3)
)) x
ii: (+0.0-0.0)3
= ( This should be the 12 elementary particles (of matter) and 4 basic forces in Standard Model (in particle physics). 12 Elementary particles: (6 quarks:) up, charm, top, Down, Strange, Bottom and (3 electrons:) electron, muon, tau and (three neutrinos:) e, muon, tau. And 4 basic forces: the gravitational force, the electromagnetic force, the weak nuclear force, and the strong nuclear force.
01: + (+(1))(+1)3
02: - ((+(1))(+1)3 x (-1)
03: - ((+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2))
04: + (+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (
05: + (+(1))(+1)2 x (-1)
06: - (+(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2
07: - (+(1))((-1)3 x (+1)))
08: + (+(1))(-1)3
)
- (
09: + (-(1))(+1)3
10: - ((-(1))(+1)3 x (-1)
11: - ((-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2))
12: + (-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (
13: + (-(1))(+1)2 x (-1)
14: - (-(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2
15: - (-(1))((-1)3 x (+1)))
16: + (-(1))(-1)3))
))) x 

This should be the Higgs boson in Standard Model (in particle physics):
17: (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)

- W. Suresh Madusanka
I hope it sounds good to you.
I used a special type of methematics to make those calculations, and I call it 3 dimensional mathematics.

En théo:
@Suresh Madusanka 
I think youtube it's not the best place to discuss anything that advanced. Surely there are better place on internet for that ?

Suresh Madusanka:
@En théo , Yes, I can understand.

En théo:
@Suresh Madusanka 
Good luck with your theory, pal. Hope you get developments.

Suresh Madusanka:

@En théo , Thanks. I'll try to develop it to connect it with Quantum Physics..
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What is a Theory of Everything: Livestream - PBS Space Time




---------------------------------------------------
Roleyboon YouTube:

@Suresh Madusanka Brother, I'm not nearly educated in mathematics enough to fully understand what's going on in this equation, so I apologise.

But, I deeply appreciate you taking the time to show me this. It's exciting to know that there are smart and knowledgeable people out there dedicating real time to exploring these concepts!

What exactly is this equation telling us?
🙏❤

Suresh Madusanka:

@Roleyboon YouTube, Thank you for your reply. 
There are few levels in my mathematical calculations, which I have separated using brackets '()' and etc, so it shows a structure, but currently it doesn't explain that whether it has a fixed size for the structure or not, and it can be a series of structures which caused to make many different types of atoms and etc.

We usually show directions with a distance like this (If distance from my school to my house = 1Km, then Distance = 1Km and Direction = my school to my house direction): 1km-0km = 1km. But we can show the 6 directions like this too: +0-0 left, +0-0 right, +0-0 up, +0-0 down, +0-0 front, +0-0 back. So we can calculate the thinkness of the Universe like this: (+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0) = (+0-0)6

What if +0-0 can make +0.0-0.0 and +1-1? Then it should be the start of something (distance and dimensions) of the Universe.
Do you know about this mathematical formula:
(a+b)2=a2+2ab+b2 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjRsTHzwZ8M)
What if the a= +0 and b= -0:
(+0-0)2 = 02 - (+1-(-1)) x 0 x 0 + 02
(+0-0)6 = (+0-0)2 x (+0-0)2 x (+0-0)2 = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3

I'm making another mathematical formula from this (+0-0)6 = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3 mathematical formula. And then I'll solve it to get the final result from it. I'm going to use my new mathematical formula with the MASS of the particles in standard model  to find the speed of light or something like that. Maybe it will be very difficult to solve that mathematical formula to find the speed of light from it, because it is a big mathematical formula which is based on the standard model in particle physics. However, currently I don't know whether it will give me the correct speed of light or not.

I didn't know about the standard model in particle physics when I started to make that calculation around 2 years ago. I just received 8 dimensional formations from it in the beginning, but few weeks ago I just continued that calculation to get the final result, and then I found another dimension (MASS dimension) from it which converted it into 16 dimensional formations with another things (Higgs boson). There are 17 things in the standard model too. However, I'm not a scientist or someone like that, that is why I posted it to here to help someone to disprove my explanation before I show it to mathematicians and scientists.

There are space for 6 dimensions because of the 6 directons of the Universe. I have explained how (+1-(-1))3 dimensions combined and make 8 dimensional formations including 4 dimensional forms with 3 dimensions and 4 dimensional forms with 4 dimensions. And then a 5th dimension (+1-(-1)) from this (+0.0-0.0)3 with a strange field (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) which caused to form the 6 quarks, 6 leptons, 4 forces and a strange Higgs boson in standard model in particle physics.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I had the opportunity to visit Wild Goose Pagoda in Xi'an and offer a prayer for peace and health for the world and for my family. Priscilla is Buddhist and asked me to offer a prayer from her as well.

Buddhism is an amazing religion and philosophy, and I have been learning more about it over time. I hope to continue understanding the faith more deeply.
 — at Giant Wild Goose Pagoda.


Devaka Jayasuriya Visit Sri Lanka , the land of Lord Budhdha. It is referred to as the God's garden in the Ramayana of Valmikie. Danasicretus , the commander of Alexander the great's navy , Megasthenes the Greek ambassador of the court of mayuran king chandragupta , and Eratosthenes the famous geographer called Sri Lanka , Taprobane. Indians called it Siladeeba ( Sihaladeepa) After the decline of Polonnaruwa dynasty around 1293 , Marco Polo visited Sri Lanka and called it Serendib and named it the most beautiful island had seen in the world.

  • Malith Sánjaya proud to be a srilankan <3 span="">
    1
  • Suresh Ranrahas Forexsigs The world respect Sri Lankan people for protecting the original Buddhist teachings. Theravada Buddhists in many countries use the Buddhist Tripitaka which was written in Pali Language using Sinhala Scripts in Sri Lanka. And that is why many Sri Lankans have a special proud about Sri Lanka.
------------------------

Why Buddhism Is True


Nathaniel Hall:
@Suresh Madusanka Theres really proof supporting buddism?

Suresh Madusanka:
​@Nathaniel Hall , There are proofs about rebirth, power of mind (reading and influence mind and etc), evolution (The Buddha said about the evolution of life.), Purification of mind (power of meditation), The natural possibility to perform miracles (Eg: levitation, moving and bending objects from mind) (quantum tunneling, quantum entanglement and etc), Existence of Heavens, and brahma world in other dimensions (Time is a dimension, and the Dark Matter exists in a invisible dimension), Galaxy Clusters, Galaxies and solar systems in Buddhism and etc: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxxQfSqXDbI

Thidaswin Athsara:
@Suresh Madusanka Bro how do you know this much things? I am also learning buddhism and i am also hoping to write a book, or an article about the Buddhism and Science, Where do you live? from where u are, Sri lanka? I am learning from Waharaka thero.

Suresh Madusanka:
​@Thidaswin Athsara, You can read my 'bauddha-tharka blogspot'' and buddhist-essentials-and-concepts blogspot' blogs to see how I collected and developed my knowledge about Buddhism, Science and etc. I didn't want to waste my replies, and I wanted to collect and share the reasons why someone should convert to Buddhism (I converted to Buddhism from Roman Catholic), so that is why I made those blogs. My father is a Buddhist but he didn't teach me about Buddhism, but when I was around 7-9 years he told me that Jesus could perform miracles from the power of meditation, but it didn't convert me to Buddhism. I converted to Buddhism because when I was around 11 years old a buddhist asked me to find the reasons to good and  bad births, and why some people extremely suffer, and etc. Most religions ignore the suffering which we can clearly see in the animal world, but the Buddhism explain about the suffering of all living beings. I usually try to use a lot of time to think, research, study, analyse before I answer, because I had enough time for it. So if you have enough time, then you can do the same. I'm from Colombo. You can discuss with me online (smlanka.lk@gmail.com, Skype: suresh.slk).

------------------------

Finding The Theory Of Everything

Knowing God’s thoughts: Einstein’s unfinished dream – Public lecture by Dr. Don Lincoln



Suresh Madusanka (1 day ago / 1st-Oct):
This is my theory of everything: 
Distance of Directions in beginning of the Universe: (+0-0)6 
i: (+1-(-1))3

ii: (+0.0-0.0)3
= ( This should be the Pure Eight (Pali: Suddhātthaka) in Buddhism: Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas, Character (Pali: Gati) Of Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas)
A: + (+1)3
B: - ((+1)3 x (-1)
C: - ((-1)2 x (+1)2))
D: + (-1)2 x (+1)
- (
E: + (+1)2 x (-1)
F: - ((+1)2 x (-1)2
G: - ((-1)3 x (+1)))
H: + (-1)3)
)) x
ii: (+0.0-0.0)3
= ( This should be the 12 elementary particles (of matter) and 4 basic forces in Standard Model (in particle physics). 12 Elementary particles: (6 quarks:) up, charm, top, Down, Strange, Bottom and (3 electrons:) electron, muon, tau and (three neutrinos:) e, muon, tau. And 4 basic forces: the gravitational force, the electromagnetic force, the weak nuclear force, and the strong nuclear force.
01: + (+(1))(+1)3
02: - ((+(1))(+1)3 x (-1)
03: - ((+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2))
04: + (+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (
05: + (+(1))(+1)2 x (-1)
06: - (+(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2
07: - (+(1))((-1)3 x (+1)))
08: + (+(1))(-1)3
)
- (
09: + (-(1))(+1)3
10: - ((-(1))(+1)3 x (-1)
11: - ((-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2))
12: + (-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (
13: + (-(1))(+1)2 x (-1)
14: - (-(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2
15: - (-(1))((-1)3 x (+1)))
16: + (-(1))(-1)3))
))) x 

This should be the Higgs boson in Standard Model (in particle physics):
17: (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)

- W. Suresh Madusanka
If someone can understand it, then I can explain more about it.!


Pero Juric:
The fu*k?

He is Mi and I am Yu:
I guess the next big breakthrough in physics may come from a bright mind with radical new ideas.
So, good on you for trying, I applaude you.

Jimmy:
You’re missing a bracket

He is Mi and I am Yu:
@Jimmy Ah dangit, there goes the nobel prize...

Chris Zachtian:
Zero day

Art Rose:
Please don't.

Suresh Madusanka:
@Jimmy , Yes, I'll correct it.

Suresh Madusanka:
@He is Mi and I am Yu, I was completing few more steps of it from yesterday (1st Oct) morning to until now (2Am) to send it to here:
There is space for 6 dimensions because of the 6 directons of the Universe. I have explained how (+1-(-1))3 dimensions combined and make 8 dimensional formations including 4 dimensional forms with 3 dimensions and 4 dimensional forms with 4 dimensions. And then a 5th dimension (+1-(-1)) from this (+0.0-0.0)3 with a strange field (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) which caused to form the 6 quarks, 6 leptons, 4 forces and a strange Higgs boson in standard model in particle physics.

(+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3

(+0.0-0.0)3 = (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)


Most Possible or Probable Outputs of (+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) : 
 
(+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) = (+0.0-0.0) x (0) x (0) x (+0.0-0.0) ----(A)

(+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) = (+0.000/(0) - 0.000/(0)) x (+0.0x(0)-0.0x(0)) ----(B)

From the (A):

(+0.000 - 0.000) x 1_.. = (+0.0-0.0) x (0) x (0) x 1..x(1/1) ----(P)

((+0.000 - 0.000) x 1_..)/ ((0) x 1..x(1/1)) = (+0.0-0.0) x (0) ----(C)

From the (B) and (C):

(+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) = (+0.000/(0) - 0.000/(0)) x ((+0.000 - 0.000) x 1_..)/ ((0) x 1..x(1/1))

1_.... x (+0.0-0.0) = (+0.000/(0) - 0.000/(0)) x (1....x(3/3) x 1_..)/ ((0) x 1..x(1/1)) ----(Q)

1_.... x 1..x(1/1) x (+0.0-0.0) x (0) / (1....x(3/3) x 1_..)  = (+0.000/(0) - 0.000/(0)) ----(D)


From the (B) and (D):

(+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) = (+0.0x(0)-0.0x(0)) x 1_.... x 1..x(1/1) x (+0.0-0.0) x (0) / (1....x(3/3) x 1_..)

(+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) = (+0.00-0.00) x (+0.00-0.00) x 1_.... x 1..x(1/1) / (1....x(3/3) x 1_..)



Using this (a+b)2=a2+2ab+b2 Mathematical formula to get the Most Possible or Probable Outputs of this result: 

(+0.00-0.00) x (+0.00-0.00) x 1_.... x 1..x(1/1) / (1....x(3/3) x 1_..) 

= (0.00^2 - (1...... x 1......) x 0.00 x 0.00 + 0.00^2) x 1_.... x 1....x(3/3) / (1......x(5/5) x 1_..) 

= (0.00000 - (1......) x 0.00000 /(5/5) + 0.00000) x 1_.... x 1....x(3/3) / 1_..

= ((0.00000 + 0.00000) x 1....x(3/3) - (1......) x 0.00000 /(5/5) x 1....x(3/3)) x 1_.... / 1_..

Starting to use the 6th dimension. But it makes many small forms of it, because it is unable to make a large main dimension.

= ((0.00000 + 0.00000) x 1....x(3/3) - (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) x 1....x(3/3) x 0.00000 /(5/5)) x 1_.... / 1_..

= (((1 x 0.00000 + 1 x 0.00000) x 1....x(3/3)) - ((+0.5......-(-0.5......)) x 1....x(3/3) x 0.00000 /(5/5))) x 1_.... / 1_..

= (0.00000 x 2...., x (+0.5......-(-0.5......))x(3/3) - (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) x 1....x(3/3) x 0.00000 /(5/5)) x 1_.... / 1_..

= (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) x (0.00000 x 2...., x(3/3) - 1....x(3/3) x 0.00000 /(5/5)) x 1_.... / 1_..

= (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) x (2...., x(3/3) - 1....x(3/3) /(5/5))  x 0.00000 x 1_.... / 1_..

= (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) x 3 x (2....,/3 - 1..../3 /(5/5))  x 0.00000 x 1_.... / 1_..

= (+1.5......-(-1.5......)) x (2....,/3 - 1..../3 /(5/5))  x 0.00000 x 1_.... / 1_..

= (+0.5......-(-0.5......) +1.......-(-1.......)) x (2....,/3 - 1..../3 /(5/5))  x 0.00000 x 1_.... / 1_..

So, the final output of this (+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) is nearly: (+0.5-(-0.5) +1-(-1)) x (2/3 - 1/3 /(5/5))  x 0.00000 x 1_.... / 1_..

According to the Standard Model of Particle Physics, 
the Spin of most elementary particles = 1/2 (or 0.5)
the Charge of some Quarks = 2/3
the Charge of other Quarks = -1/3
the Charge of electrons = -1

According to my mathematical calculations the +1 dimension is unstable because there is already a larger +2/3 dimension against the -1/3 dimension, so that can be the reason to disappear the charge in neutrinos. 

I think my mathematical calculations clearly show a similarity to the elementary particles in the Standard Model in Particle Physics.

- W. Suresh Madusanka
(This is my second part of The Theory Of Everything.)


He is Mi and I am Yu:
@Suresh Madusanka I'm not a theoretical physicist, so I'm not sure I fully understand your theory. But nice to hear it matches up with the standard model.
Have you, by any chance, been able to calculate the masses of elementary particles from your theory? Or maybe other constants like the Gravitational constant or Sommerfeld's constant?

Suresh Madusanka (4AM):
​@He is Mi and I am Yu, ​ I still didn't try to investigate more about it. And I just took very few hours to think about it yet. I hope to try to calculate the masses and other constants mathematically, but I guess it will take few months to give my full attention for it again. And I'll have to do the investigation alone, but I'll try to collect more details about the standard model to use those things to think more about the mathematical possibilities of my mathematical formulas again soon or later. Thank you so much for your replies.

------------------------------------------

Robert Thurman- Buddhist contributions to physics, biology, and psychology


Suresh Madusanka:
According to Buddhist Quantum Physics there are 8 elementary ghosts (particles) called Pure Eight (Pali: Suddhātthaka).



No comments:

Post a Comment