Arguments on Buddhism: My ideas and comments on Buddhism

Why Reincarnation Could be Possible

Benjamin Phillips:
I don’t believe in reincarnation and I never believed in it when I was a frog either.

Suresh Wanayalae:
I guess you did the same when you were an Alien.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

These Jim Rohn Quotes Are Life Changing! (Motivational Video)

4 Life Lessons from Buddha (Buddhism)

5 SIGNS YOU'RE FINALLY AWAKE

Elon Musk's Speech Will Leave You SPEECHLESS | Elon Musk Motivation

Sacred City of ANURADHAPURA

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Star Explosion Will Be Seen On The Earth

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Buddha's Radical Reinterpretation of Karma

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

orangutan show | funny boxing by orangutan

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Buddhism is best if u read the book then u know the buddhism.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A Buddhist Tale About Honesty

Suresh Wanayalae:

According to the story, the good man was the Bodhisatwa (The Buddha), and the bad man was Devadatta in a previous life. As I remember, that hate of the bad man came until the last life of the good man (The Buddha).

Maria Malhotra:

What does that mean?

Suresh Wanayalae:

@Maria Malhotra, According to Buddhism Devadatta hated the Bodhisatwa (before the Buddhahood) many life times since he developed a hate (a samsaric hate) toward the Bodhisatwa after that incident which happened many aeons (many big bangs) ago.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MN68 Nalakapana Sutta - At Nalakapana | Ajahn Brahm | 13 June 2021

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Even Bananas 08: The solar neutrino problem

Suresh Wanayalae:
Maybe there are male neutrinos and female neutrinos too.! But maybe neutrinos have an identity higher than female and male identities (Eg: genderless Brahma beings) too (Eg: (1-1)/3, (2-2)/3, (3-3)/3)).!

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

15 Most Valuable Lessons from Buddha — Buddhism

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Man With 10% of a Brain

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

How Artificial Intelligence Reads Minds

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Shocking Way Your Body Makes Electricity

It's Okay To Be Smart:

If we run on electricity does that make us all cyborgs? 🤔

Let me know what you thought of the video and tag me on Instagram and Twitter when you share! @DrJoeHanson @okaytobesmart

Suresh Wanayalae:

There are quantum fields everywhere. The amazing creation of two heads of a planaria flatworm by cracking bioelectrical signals of a planaria flatworm after cutting a planaria flatworm and changing quantum fields (changing electrical communication of non neural but related bioelectricity) beyond the structure of genes shows that bioelectrical fields are able to travel beyond the physical neural system. And it seems that it is like the fields of mind which can move outside the body because of the quantum fields of empty space too. So a continuation of the quantum fields of mind can make rebirth possible as a natural connectivity of quantum fields with another bioelectrical body, because atoms are not the only nature of quantum fields and the empty space can play a big role as a medium too. And some people (Eg: Lior Suchard) can read and influence the mind using some fields of the mind. (The electrical blueprints that orchestrate life | Michael Levin: YTube (video id): XheAMrS8Q1c)

According to Buddhism there are 4 fundamental natures in the universe called "Paramartha Dharma". Those four (4) concepts are known as Rupa (4 fundamental + 24 material phenomena in number), Chaitasika (52), Chittha and Nibbana (Nirvana State). According to Buddhist Abhidhamma the mind is based on fields (like beautiful paintings) called Chitta Bhumi. The Final Theory: Ytube Video id: Tb6MOo1dFH0

We need a spirituality development system to understand the reality better.

Michel.B:

@Suresh Wanayalae fields of minds is something very vague, more a philosophical description, than a real, physical object. It is certainly not related to a quantum field. Btw, atoms are not part of any quantum field. Nobody, even Lior Suchard can read mind, but he may be aware of unconscious signaling, non verbal signs, that can appear as "reading the mind".

Suresh Wanayalae:

@Michel.B , Learn quantum mechanics to learn how scientists detect Atoms using the ripples in quantum fields. All the atoms are just dimensions and quantum fields. And there is not big difference between quantum fields, so that is why it can easily continue from one place to another even through empty space. The single cell organisms use only very few fields, but those single cell organisms don't have a perfect mind, and I think according to Buddhist abhidhamma it requires a lot of fields (citta bhumi) to call it a normal mind. Search about "Ram Bahadur Bomjon, Lior Suchard" first then you will find supernatural things. Some people talk about chemistry only, but quantum physics talks about quantum fields. And there are people who could move out from their body as a near death experience (NDE) or as a result of meditation (Eg: Balangoda Ananda Maithriya thero.). And there are a lot of evidence about rebirth, ghosts etc. here are very small and simple living beings, and some living cells (or viruses etc) behave like a process of a mind because maybe they have access to those fields which the consciousness continue. And the death don't kill all the living things in the body, or the contiousness can use a process of quantum entanglement to continue from somewhere else too. And there is a possibility to survive the "mind consciousness" between small quantum fields, and the death of a living being doesn't separate a living being from quantum fields because the empty space is filled with a lot of quantum fields as same as there are quantum fields in atoms. The empty space and the chemistry are not two separate things when we talk about quantum fields. And still there are things which science can't explain. The ability to read and influence people's mind is a clear proof that the mind can access and change the fields outside the brain. So just learn more about the power of mind and possibilities in quantum world.

Michel.B:

Suresh Wanayalae I know quantum mechanics, probably better than you do. There is no relation between quantum fields and thoughts, no mind consciousness. Only people unaware of what is really quantum mechanics can build such a belief. Mind consciousness is NOT a quantum field, eve if some "charlatan" write books on it. Entanglement is not related to consciousness. "the single cell organisms use only very few fields" this sentence is pure bullshit. "The ability to read and influence people's mind" has never been proved.

Suresh Wanayalae:

@Michel.B , Are you crazy? Just check more about Lior Suchard. Don't tell lies just because your are ignorent about mind reading. And there are good evidence about out of body experiences of thousands of people too. Near Death Experiences – Academic Publications: med . virginia . edu /perceptual-studies/publications/academic-publications/near-death-experiences-academic-publications/) There are limits of science. "It is said that it takes a particle accelerator the size of a milky way galaxy to probe the planck length." Mainly only the Down Quarks and Up Quarks make atoms. There are 4 more Quarks which decay into Down Quark and Up Quark in normal conditions. So the high energies inside earth can make two more types of atoms to make hell worlds and hell beings. According to Buddhism there are mainly two groups of hells called Hot hells and Cold hells too. I think definitely there is a very deep level of quantum physics for Ghosts, Gods, Brahma beings etc. If there is an invisible moment (Eg: the time between the Planck moment) after each moment of our moments then maybe we will not be able to detect those supersymmetric particles easily. And if the dark matter is not in our moment, then we can't easily observe dark matter too. Just try to understand that modern science still not able to explain some paranormal activities etc. I hope you will study more about the details I sent before you reply to me like a baby who don't even know much about the world yet.

Michel.B:

@Suresh Wanayalae Actually, they use ripples of (visible) light.

"Sensing atoms caught in ripples of light"

Suresh Wanayalae:

@Michel.B , I was talking about the particle accelarators (Eg: LHC).

Michel.B:

@Suresh Wanayalae And then ? Still no "ripples of quantum fields"

Michel.B:

@Suresh Wanayalae Lior Suchard is an Israeli mentalist and self-described "mystifier" who performs "supernatural entertainment".

What do you not understand in "mystifier" ? or in "self-described"

Suresh Wanayalae:

@Michel.B , Just listen to what Lior Suchard is talking about himself. He is doing supernatural things. You can check his channel to find how he performs. He worked for army. And he could read minds when he was 6 years old and he could say to his mother that her friends tell lies to her.

Just don't try to ignore the fact that he can read and influence minds.

Michel.B:

@Suresh Wanayalae Bullshit. He calls himself a "mystifier".

Yes, when I see the nose of my friend shivering, or when he have shifty eyes, I know he is lying. No need to read mind !!!

When I read what you have wrote, I know YOU are lying

Suresh Wanayalae:

@Michel.B , Do you think someone can always guess the name of first girlfriend or first bodyfriend using body language only? Watch the larry king show to learn how he (lior suchard) reads mind or find the videos about Sirasa TV newsfirst show about lior suchard to understand and how he can draw pictures by reading others minds. And made others draw pictures that lior suchard wanted to draw. Lior suchard can drive cars closing his eyes with the help of a mind of someone else. And Lior suchard could influence others to exchange feelings of touch between them too. There are lot more things about him. Just don't trust liers who try to tell lies about him.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

🎯61 | नालंदा विश्वविद्यालय जलवाया, फिर बुद्ध,बने ब्रह्मा, विष्णु, शिव, दुर्गा | Who burns Nalanda?

🎯155 | Ram Sita, Mahabharat Archaeological Evidence? | Fact Checking, भारत का इतिहास कब से सुरु हुआ?

🎯154 | टोना टोटका, वशीकरण, भ्रूण हत्या, चोरी, माता पिता वध Upanishad Exposed Part4 | Science Journey

🎯102 | बुद्ध, वेदो की निंदा करते थे या प्रचार? Buddha and Veda Conspiracy | Science Journey

🎯84 | ब्राह्मणवाद ने किस तरह सम्यक संस्कृति खत्म की? Religious Intolerance of Brahmanvaad

🎯129 | kya buddha se pahle hindu dharm tha? Hinduism is copied from Buddhism? | 10 Facts #Buddha

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SCAM: Prophesies of Muhammad in the Buddhist Scriptures - Zakir Naik (a popular liar)

Suresh Wanayalae (via Norman):

Killing animals is a sin in Buddhism. There is a very big difference in Buddhism and Islam. The Maitreya Buddha will appear after the current Buddhism disappears completely. But Zakir Naik says that Maithreya Buddha is Prophet Mohomad. It is an misleading information to scam people to convert people to Islam. Maithreya Buddha is another Buddha as same like the Gautam Buddha. But Zakir Naik try to put the Maithreya Buddha into a completely different religion called Islam. THAT IS A VERY BIG SCAM, AND ZAKIR NAIK IS A VERY BIG L I A R. Any intelligent person can understand how Islam and Muslims behave.

Ateeb Malik:

@Norman Milroy Put forward your proof, if you have any.

Suresh Wanayalae (via Norman):

@Ateeb Malik , Do self studies. Don't think that people like Zakir Naik can't lie to you. Don't behave like a baby who wants to learn everything from others.

The Maitreya Buddha will be very tall, and he will live thousands of years. He will find the very small dead body of Arhat Kashyapa thero (who was a disciple of the Gautama Buddha) between rocks, and then it will burn on his hand.

This blog "buddhist essentials and concepts blogspot" reveal truths about religions etc.

Ateeb Malik:

@Norman Milroy Brother, I am asking you to bring forth an evidence in support of your claim from Buddhist Scriptures. And by the Grace of Almighty, I study things myself also. I don't let others spoon feed me. ❤

Suresh Wanayalae (via Norman):

@Ateeb Malik , Don't waste my time. And don't lie about things that you don't know. Most Muslim countries sometimes block some Ex-Muslim websites, blog, social media pages etc. And some Muslim womens talk how Muslim men use laws to control them, and having many wifes. You can't prove whether a God helps you or not. If you are selfish and you don't care how good a God should behave sometimes you can't understand the suffering of others (including muslims). However, this is the answer for your question:

Maitreya Buddha makes his first appearance in Buddhist scriptures in the Cakkavatti Sutta of the Pali Tipitika (Digha Nikaya 26). In this sutta, the Buddha spoke of a "future time in which the dharma is entirely forgotten. Eventually, Another Buddha--Metteyya (Maitreya)--will gain Awakening, his monastic Sangha numbering in the thousands."

"Mahākassapa finally collected the relics of the Buddha to enshrine them in one stūpa." (Dhātunidhānaṃ, 27–60 - the story told in the Mahāsampiṇḍanidāna and in the Mahākassapanibbāna from the Pāli Sāvakanibbāna.)

“The Blessed One (bhagavā, the Maitreya Buddha) and Perfectly Enlightened Master Mettray will praise my virtues (guṇa). At that moment, a flame will ignite within my own corpse and burn down my remains inside the palm of the Perfectly Enlightened Master Mettray." When Mahākassapa the Elder finished expressing this vow he continued with another one: “Since the King Ajātasatrū has been informed of my nibbāna, he will come to perform faithfully the ceremony of paying respect. The three peaks of the mountain must open for the occasion and let the King come and show his veneration. When he has finished his homage the three peaks will join back together sealing over my body to remain tightly closed just as before.” (“Braḥmahākăssapatheraḥnibbān” in Hnăṅsịịà Sāvakanibbāna – Braḥasītimahāsāvakanibbāna, pp. 42–61,)

Just use "blog spot buddhist essentials and concepts" to understand a lot of things about reality.

Shaz REACTS:

@Norman Milroy provide evidence from their scripture instead of talking on air

Suresh Wanayalae (via Norman):

@Shaz REACTS , I already provided evidence in my previous reply. There are many types creator Gods in many religions, which proves that the creators of those religions didn't know about a real one. Zakir Naik is using ignorent people to misguide people. Hinduism or Christianity didn't mention a prophet called Mohomad. Mohomad could easily use all the existing religions and developed educational systems to make a new religion. There is no evidence for a creator God (YTV ID: iXM8Zfq0YFQ). The universe is mathematical. Don't use difitions of God to create a God. Nobody exists without using existing materials or energy. And those things don't have a potential to make an universal mind to control or create the universe. We have to use our own minds to understand and control the universe or stop the existence of life in the universe. Just use your common sense first. And try to experience good feelings and potential of mind first, without wasting your time with beliefs. There are a lot of scientific evidence about the power of mind etc.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Is Muhammad Mentioned by Name in the Song of Solomon? (Feat. Zakir Naik & David Wood)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

🎯48 | #AllahExposed | जमीन चपटी या शुतुरमुर्ग के अंडे की तरह ? PART2 | Earth looks Ostrich egg ?

🎯128 | Muhammedvaad Part 2 | भावना आहत होने की कीमत गर्दन क्यों? France Incidents | Science Journey

🎯150 | Hijri calendar | मक्का मे बुद्ध, और 3 देवियों की पूजा? | Islamic Calendar | Science Journey

🎯79 | ज्योतिष का काला इतिहास PART1 | Untold History of Astrology explained by Science Journey

🎯161 | Gandhi vs Dr Ambedkar Part2 | Gandhi कितने ब्राह्मणवादी? Marx भी निपटे | Science Journey

🎯76 | Buddha ko vishanu bana diya? PART 2 | Buddha became Vishanu | Untold history of samyak culture

Suresh Wanayalae:
There is a difference between Hindu Vishnu god and Buddhist Varuna god. There is no Vishnu in Buddhism. Dhajagga Sutta (in Buddhism) explains about 4 powerful Gods, but they are not eternal Gods like in Hinduism.

The 4 Powerful Gods in Buddhism:

1.) Sakra Devendra

2.) Prajapati

3.) Varuna

4.) Ishana

The 4 Powerful Gods in Hinduism:

1.) Indra

2.) Brahma

3.) Vishnu

4.) Ishwar (Shiva)

Some Hindu books were written (and modified) to make Buddhism a part of Hinduism. They made Avatars of Vishnu.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What Is Our Root Problem In Early Buddhism?

Nancy Jackson:
When you follow the Buddha's teaching, you find that craving is ignorance, which lies at the bottom of all suffering.

Suresh Wanayalae:
Nancy Jackson, According to Buddhism craving (greed) is like mother and delusion (misconception/illusion/ignorance) is like father of the samsaric (journey of births) life. And as I know the Buddha told monks to kill both of them. There is a difference between them.

Rex Austin (24-09-2021):
@Suresh Wanayalae do the monks manage to live without either of these?

Suresh Wanayalae:
@Rex Austin , It depends on their purpose and practice. And I guess there are stream-entered (Sotapanna) monks who will be able to live without them within 7 lifetimes in the heavens (Brahma realms). I think we need a long lifetime and a soft body (eg: Brahma beings) to remove greed easily, but unfortunately, humans live only around 100 years.

Rex Austin:
@Suresh Wanayalae I don't know what you are talking about all this 'lifetimes' and brahma beings. Mystical and supernatural are not sensible to me. Care to elaborate?

Suresh Wanayalae:
@Rex Austin , According to Buddhism (Abhidhamma), there is a misunderstanding in our mind called Ditthi (identification as a self) that doesn't put us on the quick path (stream) of liberation from life and death. Removing that Ditthi is the way of entering that stream of liberation. But as a result of remaining greed and delusion, we will be reborn in the heavens or Brahma realms until we complete the path of liberation. So, that continuation of the next few rebirths depend on the state of mind. And finally, they will not have reasons to be reborn again. According to Buddhism, they will attain complete liberation within a maximum of 7 lifetimes. Our minds create the things we observe while observing. And our mind is the entire universe for us. And our minds have the potential to create places like heavenly realms for us to enjoy, and there is the male and female difference up to heavenly worlds (Kaama worlds). There are 6 types of heavens, but the highest heaven is not much good. Above the heavens, there are Brahma realms. Most Brahma beings don't enjoy material things, but they live with their own happiness. There are 16+4 types of Brahma realms, and the higher Brahma beings live a very long time, and the higher Brahma beings almost don't have a material body, and the highest Brahma beings are almost inactive.

Rex Austin:
@Suresh Wanayalae that sounds all interesting but I don't see how these realms and rebirths would work. Honestly, seems like a lot of magical thinking and some Hinduism got mixed in with Buddhism here.

Suresh Wanayalae:
@Rex Austin , You don't need to believe that, but you can't reject that without understanding the nature of the universe. Those explanations are fundamental to Buddhism. But you have a right to doubt it. There were not many details about Brahma realms in early Vedas of Hinduism, and It seems, new Hindu books were written using some details from Buddhism, but they did a mistake by introducing a female Brahma being as a wife of the higher Brahma. If there are two main moments in the universe and we can see only one moment or if there are very small elementary particles that don't interact with our material things, then we will not be able to see those (supersymmetric) things in the universe (Eg: Dark Matter). And according to Buddhism (Abhidhamma), our minds are based on an element called Citta (mind moment) which is 17 times faster than the lifetime of a matter zone, so therefore the mind can interact faster than material things while trying to survive even after the dissolution of some groups of matter (body). There are three moments in the mind moment called Uppada (arising), Thiti (presence), and Bhanga (dissolution). That element called Citta (mind moment) is just a natural process, and it is not a living being, and it is the place the mind observes things and lives from moment to moment. And everything we see is a very fast continuation of the observations of the mind (Eg: observing dimensions of elementary particles). The Buddha could understand the process of the Citta, and he told the monks that looking at the process of Citta was the hardest thing he did. And the Buddha could discover 28 Rupa (fundamental fields of material phenomena) and 52 Chaithasika (like fundamental fields of emotions). And I guess there are fundamental fields of emotions (48+4) that help the mind to survive even without using a lot of matter fields, but according to Buddhism the Brahma realm is based on the 4 great fundamental matter elements. And if we practice our mind to live between a very small group of elementary particles or fields, then we will have a very light body. I think it is a quantum science of the mind.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Stephen Batchelor on Awakening, Embracing Existential Risk, and Secular Buddhism

Suresh Wanayalae:
A wonderful conversation. I like to share few things about Buddhism and modern science. There are quantum physics in Buddhism as well. According to Buddhism there are 8 fundamental formations called Pure Eight, including 4 great fundamental elements (ghosts/bhutas). And there are 28 material phenomena in Buddhism including the 4 great fundamental material phenomena with 24 other material phenomena. According to Buddhism there are 4 fundamental natures in the universe called "Paramartha Dharma". Those four (4) concepts are known as Rupa (4 fundamental + 24 material phenomena in number), Chaitasika (52), Chittha and Nibbana (Nirvana State). According to Buddhist Abhidhamma the mind is based on fields (like beautiful paintings) called Chitta Bhumi.

Similarities between Science/Mathematics and Buddhism.

There are 8 main elements in the atoms called UP Quark, Down Quark, Electron, Electron Neutrino including the force carrying particles called Gluon, Photon, Z boson, W boson.

The universe should be a process of symmetric mathematical probabilities. A non dimensional zero (0∞ - zero infinity) should be equal to dimensional zeros ((+-0)^6) and it should be always based on the 6 main directions to be symmetric. And it should be equal to (+-1-+0.0+-0.0-+1)^3 as well. Then it can become 64 x 4 symmetric probabilities of formations. According to Buddhism there are 4 periods of 64 distructions within an aeon (Maha-Kalpa).

Quantum fields are not particles. The gluon field in empty space is not like the gluon field in atoms. There is a possibility to survive the "mind consciousness" between small quantum fields (Eg: Chitta Bhumi/ Mind Fields). Some people (Eg: The Buddha, Balangoda Ananda Maitreya Thero, Lior Suchard ) could read and influence (change) other people's mind. And it proves that our thoughts can go outside the brain. And there are people who could move out from their body as a near death experience (NDE) or as a result of meditation (Eg: Balangoda Ananda Maithriya thero.). "Near-death experiences are reported by 10 to 20 percent of people who survived cardiac arrest. There are explanations about the universe and life in Buddhism which we can use to understand the reality. But finding best ways to develop our mind with the help of meditation is more important.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Alan Lightman: Astronomy's Tolstoy -- Improbable Possibilities, Einstein's Dream, & More

Suresh Wanayalae:
According to Buddhism there are 4 cyclic periods with 64 destructions for each period within a great aeon. And those 4 periods make 4 different types of universes, and some types of universes don't make habitable worlds for humans.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Suresh Ran Rahas shared a link.

2tSponsoraelndh

This is about the beginning of dimensions and the universe. There are quantum superpositions according to experiments and theories of particle physics. But this is not about particle physics.! 
This is a new theory. The universe should be a process of symmetric mathematical probabilities. The 6 main directions make dimensions. A non dimensional zero (or zero infinity - 0∞) should be equal to dimensional zeros ((+-0)^6) as a separation from the infinity, which makes a density in dimensional zeros while going back to infinity. And it should always be based on the 6 main directions to be symmetric. And it should be equal to (+-1-+0.0+-0.0-+1)^3 as well. But it should be a 4 symmetric formations of existence:
1st formation: 
(-+0.0+-1-+1+-0.0),
2nd formation: 
(-+0.0+-1+-0.0-+1),
3rd formation: 
(+-1-+0.0+-0.0-+1),
4th formation: 
(+-1-+0.0-+1+-0.0). 
When a formation is active between 3 standard dimensions using the 6 directions of it, with the plus (+) and minus (-) probabilities, it can become 64 cyclic probabilities as a symmetric continuation of dimensions between up and down (-+0.0+-1-+1+-0.0) without changing it for 4 times, and also between symmetric left and right (-+0.0+-1-+1+-0.0) without changing it for 4 times, while changing the dimensional probabilities between forward and back, [as symmetric forward and back (-+0.0+-1-+1+-0.0), and then forward and back (+-0.0+-1-+1-+0.0), and then forward and back (+-0.0-+1+-1-+0.0), and then forward and back (-+0.0-+1+-1+-0.0)] allowing a total 4 symmetric probabilities. And same like that there are 4 dimensional probabilities for symmetric left and right with 4 symmetric forward and back probabilities for each. And same like that there are 4 dimensional probabilities for symmetric up and down with 16 dimensional probabilities for each. Then it can become 64 x 4 symmetric probabilities of formations.
According to Buddhism there are 4 periods of 64 destructions within a great aeon (called Maha-Kalpa). And it sounds like a process of cyclic mathematical probabillities too. Can you imagine how mathematical probabilities become endless cycles like that? - This is from W. Suresh Madusanka, who is the author of the book "Finding The Entanglement Of Binary Mathematical Structures Of The Elementary Ghosts".

Share this video as much as possible.!

Mathematical Science And Buddhism With Cyclic Probabilities Of The Universe

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Don't Be A Puppet! Start Taking Responsibility For Your Life - Jordan Peterson Motivation

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SJL28 | Islamic Punishment & पुनर्जन्म | Gulzar Eliya with Science Journey | Rational World

Suresh Wanayalae:

No one can scientifically prove that smoking cigarettes directly cause cancer, but there are analytical ways to prove it based on some probabilities. There are around 7 analytical ways to prove the rebirth:

1.) Why do some children talk about past lives? (ignorance about the existence of those children isn't a good reason to reject it. )

2.) Near-Death Experiences (Eg: There are thousands of academic publications about the mind and body separation, even without activity in the brain.)

3.) Hypnosis/ Past life regression

4.) Ghosts and Spirit Possession

5.) Receiving unusual powers to do Supernatural or Paranormal activities. (Eg: Lior Suchard, Ram Bahadur Bomjon)

6.) Powers of meditation that change the brain waves, and sometimes help to perform supernatural activities.

7.) Some animals are very active from birth.

8.) Scientists can't explain the reason to exist Charm Quark, Strange Quark, Top Quark, Bottom Quark, Dark Matter. And there is no big difference between particles in atoms and Quantum Foam in empty space. So there is a possibility for the mind to travel through the quantum form if our mind behaves like waves and fields.

Suresh Wanayalae:

The Bodhisatwa came from Thusitha heaven to be a human and to be a Buddha. Buddhist Suttas in Tripitaka which obviously mentioned Rebirth:

1.) Chulla Kamma Vibhanga Sutta

2.) Saleiyaka Sutta

3.) Sakka Sutta

4.) Chakkawatti Sutta

5.) Maha Sihanadha Sutta

6.) Khandaraka Sutta

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

🎯166 | हिंदूइस्म कब आया ? | Live Debate with Ghalib Kamal, Harish Sultan ,Gulzar & Science Journey

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Are Humans the Only Animals That Have Culture? | IN OUR NATURE

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Devas and Buddhism | Ajahn Brahmali | 23 July 2021

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kids Who Remember Their Past Lives

Best Evidence of Life After Death

Science Experiment Proves Afterlife Is Real

What Happens When You Die?

Did a Doctor Discover Proof of Past Lives

Kids Who Remember Their Past Lives #2

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ANIMALS KILL ANIMALS SO SHOULD WE DO IT TOO? | Raw Vegan | Fruitarian | Breatharian

Suresh Wanayalae:
We need to find and apply the best solutions to some problems. But if we depend on problems, then it is difficult to find a solution to those problems. If the concept of creator God (Eg: Allah) causes problems, then we should leave the concept of creator God too. If we can't do that, then we will have to live with some problems which are associated with the concept of the creator God.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Satipatthana Sutta - The Four Focuses of Mindfulness - Ajahn Brahmali

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Celia Deane-Drummond on the Evolution of Wisdom and the Nature of Evil

Into the Impossible with Dr. Brian Keating

WOTM: David Mitchell on Atheism

WOTM: David Mitchell On Atheism, Pt. II

Filippa Lentzos on Emerging Threats in Biosecurity

Suresh Wanayalae:
If you look at the world you can see a war that continues under the influence of Islam. I think you should know that China announced that they will reprint Quran to make it better removing bad teachings in Quran in December 2019. However, the Coronavirus appeared in China in December 2019. I don't know whether there is a relationship between Corona and Quran or not, but I don't trust some religions. Blaming the victim (China) doesn't help us to understand the real source of risk.

Coffee Break Hero:
Do you know how China treats Muslims?

Suresh Wanayalae:
@Coffee Break Hero , China doesn't tolerate extremism. Some Muslims started violence in China, so China started to give special educations to Muslims to stop that. And it worked well. There is a documentary about it too. Some Muslim countries do things like that too (Eg: Tajikistan doesn't send Children to mosques, Banned wearing some Muslim clothes, Forcing to shave beards, etc). But some people don't like to accept that some religions create violence, and that is why they can't see the real situation.

Coffee Break Hero:
No, but also assuming their innocence because they suffered damage is a fallacy. Realistically, all we can do is hope the international intelligence agencies are competent in finding the truth and defending us when needed.

Suresh Wanayalae:
@Coffee Break Hero , There was an issue about rewriting some religious books. Some muslims were talking against even about rewriting the Bible. And probably Muslim extremists could be angry when China said that they wanted to do the same with the Quran too. A Muslim presenter talked about that issue in Jan 22, 2019 (on China Uncensored channel): "China Rewrites the Bible?! 10 Ways China is Targeting Christians and Catholics https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Ytsu95pt_4". It may not be a big issue for Christians, but it seems that it was a big probem to some muslims. And they were talking about that on behalf of Christians. I hope you can imagine how it could impact Muslim extremists when China was preparing to rewrite Quran with a few modifications.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What Was The Big Bang?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSCrSkK2HcQ

History of the Universe:
Hello all! Hope you enjoyed this first dive into brain melting physics. Next video will be in two weeks, exploring the very first moment of existence. It's only going to get more mind bending...

Suresh Wanayalae:
If there is a Graviton to create gravity then there was no gravity a moment before the Big Bang. Discovering the Cosmic Microwave Background radiation helped scientists to understand that this universe started to make hydrogen atoms using the EXISTING subatomic particles. And theories about the singularity of this universe should be based on the energies of those subatomic particles to make it a scientific argument. But the problem is trying to connect two disconnected theories called Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity (Gravity) to talk about the size of that singularity. And scientists don't know about the area of the Big Bang in the universe or the size of the entire universe, so they don't know about the total energy of the Big Bang to decide the size of the singularity. And scientists should have a theory to explain the maximum energy in the smallest singularity. And there is a possibility to increase the size of the singularity on a cyclic Big Bounce. However, science should be based on scientific arguments, and putting God between the Gaps in science is not real science. Some people still can't understand that the proofs of the evolution of life disproved some old stories about the origin of humans. Some arguments for the existence of God just show the failure of modern science, but science will develop and God will need to find more gaps in science to hide.

Suresh Wanayalae:
The world is not a perfect place for humans, and around 99% of species of animals disappeared from the world on disasters from time to time. The absolute truth about this universe might not make people happy about this universe. If naturally there are heavenly realms and hell realms in this universe then a human world should be a natural world between those realms. There are higher dimensions that can make invisible realms, and if the earth is not a scientific possibility then the universe could make heavenly realms with a different set of masses and forces because the ordinary matter is not the only set of matter in this universe. There are 3 generations of elementary particles and scientists can't explain the reason for that too. The invisible matter like Dark Matter shows us that the universe is not only about us. If there is a different speed of light or/and an invisible moment for us in Dark Matter then it is difficult to detect those things. So, we can't use the fine-tuning argument without explaining the reason why Dark Matter exists. We shouldn't think that we should have a very simple universe to make life, and scientists shouldn't use the complexity of the universe to talk about unscientific explanations. Some unknown and things are possible if we can imagine explaining them scientifically, but some unknown things (Eg: a creator God) are scientifically impossible. We just need common sense to understand that simple thing, but if some people don't care about the scientific method, and completely trust some stories in history and take unexplainable discoveries as absolute truth without understanding the potential and complexity of the universe, the nature of humans, the history of education, and political situations then they might imagine impossible things while allowing their ignorant chattering mind talk about those imaginations with science as science (Eg: talking a lot about an intelligent design in the universe as it is a fully verified science while trying to introduce an intelligent designer). Some people don't try to find the absolute truth, and some people try to find the absolute truth at the wrong place. Some people are just limited to some sets of knowledge, therefore some people don't even know the different types of discoveries and teachings about the absolute truth.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ash Roskell (lR9r7_MweK8):
@Suresh Wanayalae : Not sure what that last sentence means? “Scientifically impossible?” How so? To speak of a time, “before the Big Bang,” is scientifically flawed, because time was created at the Big Bang. There was no, “before,” that we can usefully speak of. Though, perhaps you were using that as a short hand? Just referring to something else (gravity, possibly?) existing as a causal state

I like the idea of testing for highest energy states that can exist in any singularity, except for the fact that the physics that we know of breaks down at a singularity, which is pretty much what the definition of, “singularity,” means. So that might be untestable. You could only discover the energy state of a nanosecond before or after a singularity occurs without creating new physics. The next, perhaps fatal, problem you have is that, once you have the answer, all you’ve got is an energy-mass for something inside our known universe. Meaning, you still haven’t solved the problem of a potentially very different set of physical laws that created the initial Big Bang in the first place, Putin you back to square one. It is not just possible, but likely that the Big Bang was utterly unique in terms of these values, or we would be seeing more big bangs occurring, or evidence of past events.

Suresh Wanayalae:
@Ash Roskell , If you read the definition of the creator God, then you can understand that it is an illogical and scientifically or theoretically unexplainable concept. It is just an unscientific imagination. Scientists didn't prove that time started from the Big Bang, because they don't have any information about the singularity. They only observed the first interactions of the elementary particles (that were discovered from CMB radiation). According to science, Energy should be conserved before and after the big bang, so the energy packet of the singularity should be a large singularity that evolved and became larger after many Big Bangs as Big Bounces. So talking about a creator God is irrelevant. I can explain it because I almost made the theory of everything to explain those things mathematically. So don't be misguided with your beliefs.

Ash Roskell:
@Suresh Wanayalae : I haven’t told you about my beliefs, therefore you have nothing to make any inference about them from. You speak of, “before the Big Bang,” which is a logical impossibility. Time was created with the universe. Unless you are arguing that time was extant in your Big Bounce theory? But, that’s not a new idea by any means, and it doesn’t answer the questions raised in this videos, other than to say, “turtles,” all the way. Rather than guessing at what I believe, discuss the science, or your beliefs, and ask what you like. But there’s no need to take a pejorative position. I’m only here for the discussion, not to quarrel with people.

Suresh Wanayalae:
@Ash Roskell , Time is a change in anything. If the singularity changes then there is a time in the singularity too. Energy is a process of change, so when there is energy then there is time that is related to fields of energy itself. And if the singularity is just one moment between a Big Crunch and a Big Bang then we can't say that time didn't pass. Scientists didn't discover the start of time, but some scientists talk like that because of their ignorance or to support Abrahamic religions. I didn't say that every Big Bounce is equal to each other, so different types of Big Bounces can make different types of universes too. I already discovered the mathematical calculation of the origin of the first universe including the dimensional structure of the elementary particles. And I could identify a few reasons why the universe should have cyclic mathematical probabilities increasing the capacity of the universe because some dimensional structures continue (as energy) on separation (like breaking) of the symmetry, quantum entanglement, etc. I don't want you to believe me, but if you want you can investigate that easily. If all the elementary particles are interconnected then we don't have a reason to reject the evolution of those elementary particles, and increasing the mass and force should try to be balanced without collapsing while trying to be symmetric for a long time. If we can find the mathematical factor that is responsible for the mathematical ratios of symmetries then we can try to understand that the universe must create Atoms, Dark matter, Black Holes, etc to be symmetric using the separated symmetries. There are hidden elementary particles like hidden variables that interact with matter. I can explain that too. There are matter and antimatter in the empty space that interacts with each other like they try to share something with each other while appearing and disappearing. So that shows to me that the matter arose with the help of antimatter dimensions, but a very small change in dimensions during the Big Bounce made more matter than antimatter. And increasing space in the observable universe shows to me that there was space before the Big Bang, or Antimatter still creates space outside of the observable universe. And antimatter gives the reason to exist matter as a mathematical symmetry in the universe, and that process doesn't require any other unscientific or scientifically impossible explanation.

Ash Roskell:
@Suresh Wanayalae : “Time is change,” thus time may well cease to be, in the Heat Death of the universe? Most, if not all, physicists who believe in the Big Bang will say that this first moment of change is the beginning of time for that reason. They don’t claim to know for certain that there was no time, only that our time began with the Big Bang, and that there is no reason to think there was any time extant, “before,” that occurred. Even proponents of the Big Bounce will tell you that we cannot meaningfully discuss any notions of time outside of that regenerative process, because, as I said previously, all theories of physics break down at a singularity; and this is what the term defines: the point in space where a black hole has its centre (or donut) at which matter, time, space, and all theories, concepts and the concept of concepts have no meaning known to science, art or nature. The singularity which started the universe (and time) is mathematically identical. These are not unscientific ideas, they are merely the state of physics and all known thinking, at this point.
What interests me about your comment is that you speak with the certainty of a man who has a proof at his disposal. There are several physicists who entertain the notion of a Big Bounce, but none that I know of who speak of it with your level of certainty. Am I misunderstanding you? Are you certain? If so, what is your proof? Outside of philosophical conjecture, I mean?
Your idea that it is antimatter that creates space (thus time as well, presumably?) is not unheard of, but again, do you have more than your belief to go on? Does it exist in our universe? Perhaps as the dark energy we can’t explain? I’m interested in what makes you so sure? Some people come to their beliefs from an instinctive perspective, in search of an answer that is more satisfying than eventual annihilation and I have come to the conclusion that most of those people are psychologically fleeing death. Others through a faith, which fulfils a similar purpose, or because they’re indoctrinated with it. Yet others simply prefer some form of certainty.
Is yours a theory? Or are you committed to it? If so, is that because you know something that science doesn’t? Or are there other scientists and a proof that comes with them, of which I am ignorant?

Suresh Wanayalae:
@Ash Roskell , If there was a singularity before the Big Bang then it could be the biggest quantum entanglement as a single object that can instantly cause sharing the information in it from one end to another as spin, mass, force, heat, and density almost making the Big Bang everywhere in the energy of that single object called Singularity, but it could fail if it was not a perfect singularity. And we could see from the CMB radiation that there were big areas of empty space in the earliest observable universe too, so scientifically we can't say that it was a perfect singularity. Some scientists try to say that it was a result of quantum fluctuations, but it is just an assumption. So according to real science, we can't say that there was no time before the Big Bang. Time is a related thing and the universe must have time to try to be symmetric even the universe fails to be symmetric again and again as Big Bounces, and even the first moment of the first universe started while trying to be symmetric between dimensions as a separation from infinity. I can show it from my mathematical calculations. I didn't show it to scientists personally yet. Sometimes I don't like to call it a theory because I just used numbers to explain the laws of nature that no one can change and still I have to understand it more too. I'm not committed to that yet because I'm working in a different field for a living. I could calculate the number of dimensions in quarks, leptons, forces, empty space, and Higgs, etc. And I could confirm the result of my calculations using scientific discoveries and Buddhist explanations about the universe and fundamental elements too. I used the 6 directions of the first nothing universe (not even space) as 12 dimensions to start the calculation. And then I could see how those 12 dimensions as +6-6 converted to a maximum of 11 dimensions including a half (0.5) dimension and 3 unstable dimensions that can cancel 3 stable dimensions that could finally show us only 4 dimensions with a half (0.5) dimension. So there are hidden dimensions that scientists should know to explain the interactions between elementary particles mathematically. I think I can predict the existence of supersymmetric elementary particles that should be around us as Dark Matter or something else that behaves like our ordinary matter in an invisible moment while we become invisible as Dark Matter when the Dark Matter is visible to Dark Matter (I'm not sure about that yet, but I can see something like that in my calculations). As I can understand my calculations, both ordinary matter and Dark Matter are supersymmetric to Matter and Dark Matter in the Black Holes. And all the Matter are supersymmetric to Antimatter too. I hope I answered your questions.

Ash Roskell:
@Suresh Wanayalae : That’s really frustrating, as it takes a while for my dyslexic brain to compose a sentence, let alone a thought out response. As I best recall, I think I tried to focus on two points? One: about the, “labelling,” of your ideas as a, “theory,” which you said you weren’t comfortable with. I suggested, “hypothesis?” And two: I was noting that the way you described it fell into the the trap of using terms like, “before,” when time is the thing you’re discussing.
What I wanted you to get, (though I don’t assume you don’t already know this?) was that presentation is everything when it comes to getting the attention of serious people. The best scientists read new ideas in the manner of a high school physics teacher, who believes s/he has better things to do, and are therefore looking for any excuse to dismiss and disregard your work. So, my advice to you would be to consider Einstein’s advice, when he said, (I’m paraphrasing from memory) “Unless you can explain your ideas to a child, in such a way that they fully understand you, it’s probably not real science.”
What he was getting at was that you can have the most brilliant notions, but can you make them clear? If you were to write a paper (something that you seem to suggest is on the way?) your introduction will be of paramount importance, unless you have Feynman levels of recognition within the physics community? The challenge of making your thesis understandable to a child is what all good scientists should take as their rule for writing their introduction. “Here’s my idea; here’s how it works; here’s what it challenges, changes or develops about what we already take to be known; here are the implications; here’s the applications; and I will now explain all of that, using my math; and here are my proposed experiments for testing the thesis / or, here are the experiments I’ve done already to support my thesis.” Get all of that into your introduction, using the simplest language possible, and any good scientist will read the whole thing with interest and follow it through.
So, you say you can’t give away all of your secrets. But, what can you tell me in the simplest terms? What would be the Title of your thesis, hypothesis, idea? And what experiments would you propose? Assume you are teaching a ten year old. Not the math, or the complexity, but the basic idea. For instance, I might say that Feynman Diagrams (my title, probably) are mathematical ways for us to express changes in energy states of the tiniest particles we can measure: how an electron might part from an atom, or exit one field, say, “light,” and then flit into another, like, “energy,” and then possibly return to it, going back to light again. Or how mass becomes energy, light or mass again, etc. Or, I might say Relativity (again, my probable title?) describes how we can observe things from different places in the universe, get different observations than someone in a different place in the universe for the same event, yet both observations can be right. Obviously, we’re not talking to a stupid or very young child, but an adolescent should be able to grasp your ideas fully.
So, with that in mind, how would you title and then describe your hypothesis? It’s a great thought experiment regardless, as it helps one order one’s thoughts and reason out a chain of explanation that clarifies the thinking anyway. But, it’s also necessary if you want to be listened to by serious people.

Suresh Wanayalae:
@Ash Roskell , Thanks for your reply, but I'll be busy for around a week, so I'll try to send a reply within a few days or weeks. However, I was not trying to seek attention from scientists or anyone else yet. But I appreciate your advice. Some theories can change but some laws of nature don't change. I didn't use any theory for my calculations, so I don't need to call it a theory. And therefore I have to call it the real mathematical laws of nature. I can explain more about it very easily, but I'll be busy for a few days or weeks. Thank you.

Ash Roskell:
@Suresh Wanayalae : I look forward to hearing from you. If you find the time? I’m always excited to learn more about these topics, but to be privileged to hear from a thinker in his workshop is quite special; whatever the level it’s aimed at. Please do get back to me. ✌️

Suresh Wanayalae:
@Ash Roskell , Today I went to Colombo University to meet someone to get information about publishing an article. And I'll be busy from monday to friday on my business and preparing the article. It is difficult to explain more about it without showing the mathematical calculations. And there are some restrictions at here too. But I'll try to reply within a week with more details. Thank you.

Ash Roskell:
@Suresh Wanayalae : Great. Thanks 👍

Suresh Wanayalae:
@Ash Roskell , There is a smallest time and a length in this universe. But scientists can't explain the reason to exist those Planck constants. And they don't know the origin of waves and the entanglement of waves with hidden elements. So they can't explain the other constants too. And without explaining the fundamental interactions they can't explain the nature of constants and about hidden constants. If the planck length is the smallest length of a smallest matter zone that means that there is one or more simple fundamental structure that makes all the matter including all the constants as an emergence from that. According to Buddhist teachings, there are 17 moments (like wave moments including 3 moments in the wave moment) in a lifetime of a matter zone. There 28 matter elements (like matter fields) and 52 mind elements (like mind fields) as an interaction of 8 pure elements including 4 great elements. And the fundamental mind is just a moment (like a wave moment of observation) in the universe that runs very faster. That is a great explanation in Buddhism about fundamental matter and mind fields. But still most people including most scientists don't talk about that old knowledge much. And they just talk or know about the 4 great elements (solid, liquid, gas, heat) or about primitive western philosophy about atoms.

Ash Roskell:

@Suresh Wanayalae : Indeed, I believe the current term for these formative waves is, “Branes,” as in a contraction of, “Membranes.” And they further speculate that it may be a clashing (or coming together of) these branes that caused the creation of our universe? Of course, this leaves us to speculate about what caused them to exist, whether the values they created must always necessarily be the same, or whether (like with impact speeds and angles) subtle differences might have created differences, producing different values, thus a very different universe? From there we can ask whether that is indeed happening, perhaps constantly, producing multiple, infinite universes? But, the biggest question then is, can we do any useful experiments to demonstrate their existence, or infer them? And / or, whether someone like you can posit a hypothesis, through equations, thought experiments, etc, that could cast light on these notions? After all, we have seen time and again throughout the history of physics, that some people come up with the great ideas, and it was someone else who came up with the experiments that offered proofs. That’s pretty much the story of Einstein’s Relativity theories.

Your information about Buddhist beliefs was truly fascinating to me. So often I have read things about ancient belief systems that touch so closely on what we later have discovered through science that I become convinced they were on to something. At other times I wonder if it was just a lucky guess, as it were, depending on my mood I suppose. But, more often than not, I am drawn to these ideas because they are statistically too close to the truth for a scientist to dismiss out of hand. Take the flood myths, which feature in the story of Gilgamesh, all three of the Abrahamic faiths, and several others. Their commonality is more than just coincidence, as geology and other disciplines have revealed. Especially when you start to place their time lines. They are not, “evidence for God,” as some wish to infer, but they do put forward compelling evidence for a giant flood event, which must have effected a giant geographical area and thus entered into the cultures of several civilisations, and their subsequent mythos’.

Buddhism in particular has always charmed me, but has also had some deeply insightful myths of its own. Moreover, their discipline and thought exercises are genuinely helpful to anyone who does deep thinking for a living. And, yet further than this, they seem to have some deeply well thought out ideas about how the universe works.

There are many respected scientists who encourage this sort of thinking and the broadening of our minds in this way. And it seems to be more acceptable for great physicists like Carlo Rovelli to publish books which ask us to think more broadly about the questions of existence and to allow a more broad minded approach to questions of physics to influence our thinking. This, of course, is not to be confused with, “bringing God into the lab,” or basing scientific theories on theological notions. Far from it. What many get so confused about in science is that, as a discipline, it is meant to find the truth whatever it may be and should no more be preoccupied with disproving theology, than it should with disproving Marvel Superheroes. This is why I say that science has nothing to say about theology, even when theology has much to say about science.

Physicists like Rovelli and many others are making the point that it is as arrogant and foolish for a scientist to say, “there is no god,” as it is for them to say, “there are no aliens on other worlds.” The second statement can at least be usefully investigated. But the point of spirituality is to broaden, not narrow the mind.

To that end, my question for you is: Where did you learn about Buddhism? Was that just an observation in passing, or something more cultural? I ask, only because I would like to do some reading on Buddhism (particularly on the nature of its connection to physics) but there is so much tosh out there, it’s very hard to get a decent recommendation. Any tips would be welcome.

I’m looking forward to hearing more about your hypotheses too.

Ash Roskell:

@Suresh Wanayalae : By the way, I meant to ask? And, I’m moving slightly into depths that are a little beyond my scope here, but: regarding the transfer of mass and energy that we see occurring to electrons and other particles. Are we not actually inferring these wave fields, like the ones described in Feynman Diagrams, and seeing evidence of these, “Branes,” in the fields themselves? Or, am I missing something more fundamental there? . . .

Suresh Wanayalae:

@Ash Roskell , We have to explain the entire universe/megaverse as a single thing because that is the most natural thing that can happen in a natural universe. I can't imagine two natural mega universes because only one thing can appear as matter dimensions and antimatter dimensions without anything. But it can become a megaverse or a sort of multiverse with strongly interacting universes. So I don't think that there are two or more different types of universes in a multiverse or megaverse. But the only thing the universe naturally cares about is the symmetry in the universe. And the entire symmetry and separated symmetries work together as a cyclic process using structures, groups, and constants, etc. If we think about the very small dimensional asymmetry between matter and antimatter, then we can understand that that asymmetry must make some things that can evolve with a natural cyclic process. The speed of light/photons is only a named constant because other elementary particles travel slower than light/photons. If the evolution of the universe increased the force in gluons that can travel faster than light and matter (rotate quickly at the speed of light) then it can try to attract matter to be stable making atoms.

There are a lot of wrong information about some old stories (Eg: about evolution, about a big flood, and almost all the animal species surviving in a big ship), and some stories are illogical (Eg: Adam's sin making a God angry, and sacrifice of Jesus's life to make his father happy to remove the sin, but if Jesus is still alive then that was a fake sacrifice, and making many religions by the same God to fight with each other, etc). So please don't talk with me about God. Some scientists can't understand that aliens, heavenly beings in parallel worlds, and a sort of multiverse are scientifically possible, but a creator God is scientifically impossible. And some people who just don't use their brain well on their cultural or religious illutions can't understand that talking about a possibility to exist a creator God as a scientific possibility is like thinking about a possibility to exist a universe that can make a creator God. So if a universe can make a creator God why do we need a creator God to create the universe? Most major religions developed after the big change/wave/bang caused by Buddhism. But some people including some politicians, scientists, and religious leaders are happy with their own religion and beliefs and they don't try to learn and practice other teachings about life, and they just live their life within their limits while controlling their followers as their own property. And some followers don't know that they follow a corrupted system. And sometimes they corrupted and still try to corrupt better systems too.

I learned Buddhism online, and from television because I was a Roman Catholic and I went to Catholic schools only. You can try to study Paramartha Dhamma in Abhiddhama teachings to understand Quantum physics in Buddhism.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

📞46 | Sam Harrish Ne Buddh ke bare me ye kya kah diya.. | Amit Tiwari & Science Journey