My ideas and comments on Buddhism - Page 19

Meeting Jim Al-Khalili, Quantum Physicist and Science broadcaster

Suresh Madusanka:
A wonderful conversation. I watched many documentaries of Jim Al-Khalili. The Universe is based on dimensional mathematics. Finding The Dimensions In The Universe Mathematically (The Theory Of Everything):
The duality of 6 directions and the 6 distances of the first start of the Universe: Matter + Antimatter =  (+0-0)^6 + (-0+0)^6 
According to this mathematical formula: (a+b)^2=a^2+2ab+b^2
(+0-0)^6 
= (+1-(-1))^3 x (+0.0-0.0)^3
= ( This should be the Pure Eight (Pali: Suddhātthaka):
Step 1:
(+1-(-1))^3 =
 
+ (+1)3 
- ((+1)3 x (-1)
- ((-1)2 x (+1)2))
+ (-1)2 x (+1)
- (
+ (+1)2 x (-1)
- ((+1)2 x (-1)2
- ((-1)3 x (+1)))
+ (-1)3)
)) x
(+0.0-0.0)^3 = (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
Step 2:
(+1-(-1))^3 x (+(1)-(-(1)))= 8 elementary particles x  (+(1)-(-(1))) = 16 elementary particles
Output of this (+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) is nearly: (+0.5-(-0.5) +1-(-1)) x (2/3 - (1/3)xNull/(5/5) + (1/3)xNull/(5/5))  x 0.00000 x 1_.... / (+Null-Null) x 1_..
Outputs: 1/2 (or 0.5), 
2/3
, -1/3
, -1 (It shows a similarity to the elementary particles. )
I think I found the mathematical reasons for the existence of the charge of the elementary particles of the standard model in particle physics, but I'll try to find the reasons to the existence of the masses and the forces of the particles mathematically.
- W. Suresh Madusanka
------------------------------------------------------------

Lothar Schafer - What is Ultimate Reality?


Suresh Madusanka:
The origin of the smallest unit of matter, called a “suddhāṭṭhaka.” (sometimes written as suddhāshtaka). 

These original suddhāṭṭhaka have lifetimes of close to 20 antakkappa (or antarākappa in Sinhala), where 80 such antakkappa are in a mahā kappa (great aeon).

When enormous numbers of these suddhāṭṭhaka fuse, they get to a more condensed state of “mahā bhūta.” The subtle bodies of Brahmā and some gandhabbā are made of mahā bhūta.

Only when vast amounts of these mahā bhūta fuse together to become even more condensed, that we can see them. At this highly condensed state, the matter is called “dhātu.” Bodies of devas are made of finer dhātu. That is why we cannot see devas, but Brahmā can see them.

Thus our bodies are made of more dense dhātu that we can see. That is why solid objects are called “Pathavi dhātu“;  suddhāṭṭhaka in such solid objects have predominantly Pathavi.

The Buddha said, “manō pubbaṅgamā dhammā…”, i.e., “everything has a mind as the precursor…”.

However, almost all of the matter around us was created by this “mental process” a very long time ago. That is the story in the Aggañña Sutta. At present also, suddhāṭṭhaka are being created by us all the time (via javana citta), but in very minute quantities.

Thus instead of having a lifetime of 17 thought moments, as some people erroneously believe, a suddhāṭṭhaka has a very long lifetime. 

Anyone with higher abhiññā powers is supposed to be able to create a significant amount of matter, like a flower or even larger entities. Matter (at the level of suddhāṭṭhaka) is created by javana citta. And someone with abhiññā powers can maintain a citta vithi with javana citta flowing continuously to generate “significant amounts of matter.” I briefly discussed that at the end of the post, “Citta Vithi – Processing of Sense Inputs.”

Four of these are the “satara mahā bhūta“ (The Four Great Bhūta. Bhūta is another name for “ghost” because of their elusive nature.): Pathavi (Solid/Earth), āpo (Liquid/Water), tejo (Heat/Fire), vāyo (Gas/Air). These are indeed the most fundamental units of matter, but they cannot be detected by themselves. The four mahā bhūta ('Matter') are with four basic “gati” ('Character of Matter'/ 'Antimatter'): Pathavi gati (hard/coarse), āpo gati (bound/attracted/liquidity), tejo gati (fiery or energetic), vāyo gati (motion). Thus, in Buddha Dhamma, it says, “gati (character) attracts a similar gati”.

Thus “gati” leads to “bhūta,” the first phase of rupa that can be seen (only by Buddha). That is the suddhāṭṭhaka stage. That is where mental energy is converted to matter at the very fundamental stage.

Now, the craving for these material things leads to four more gati due to taṇhā. Due to our tendency to think highly (“varnanā karanava” in Sinhala), another gati of “vaṇṇa” is created as different manifestations of the satara mahā bhūta. Similarly, three more units called gandha, rasa, and oja created due to taṇhā.
(*It sounds like that there are 8 invisible elementary particles with some activities as Ghosts. Those 8 different types of activities made information, atoms etc.)

These eight never arise in isolation and thus are called “avinibbhoga rupa.” They always rise together; all eight are there in any suddhāṭṭhaka. The relative “amounts” of each component can vary, and thus some suddhāṭṭhaka can be dominated by one element, for example. Even then, all eight are present to some extent. That is equivalent to saying that wherever there is avijjā, there is taṇhā, and vice versa.

One’s character (gati) determines one’s future births. The ability to figure that out is called the “nāmarūpa pariccēda ñāna“ (one understands how the mind is related to matter, i.e., how viññāna acts as the critical link between mind and matter.).

(*Read more about "The Origin of Matter – Suddhāṭṭhaka" at Pure Dhamma website.)

Tunishq Von:
is that means and proves that consiousness exits in reality?and it is not a byproud of brain matter?is everything is immaterial and unphysical.and what is parmatma then.please explain paramatma.

Suresh Madusanka:
@Tunishq Von , No, it means that our mind is also based on the first 4 elementary particles in the Universe called 'Maha Bhūta Gati (Gati Bhūta)'  ('Character of matter ghosts/particles') which cause to form another 4 matter elementary particles in the Universe called 'Mahā Bhūta'. And our mind doesn't have a start, because the Universe started to form from the first 4 elementary particles ('Gati Bhūta') which was the first cause to form the mind with the help of other elementary particles. The first relationship of the mind is with the immaterial particles ('Gati Bhūta'), and that immaterial particles caused to make the matter particles ('Mahā Bhūta'), so it sounds like the mind ('Gati Bhūta') made the matter. And mathematically I think the matter particles are under or outside the first 4 elementary particles like this: immaterial particles (matter particles)  OR matter particles (immaterial particles). I guess the particles which are inside the bracket caused to form the particles which are outside the bracket. Eg:  According to this mathematical formula: (a+b)^2=a^2+2ab+b^2
(+1-(-1))^3 =
 (+1)3 - ((+1)3 x (-1) - ((-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-1)2 x (+1) - ((+1)2 x (-1) - ((+1)2 x (-1)2 - ((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-1)3)
There are two sets:
Outside set:
(+1)3 - ((+1)3 x (-1) - ((-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-1)2 x (+1) 
Inside set:
- ((+1)2 x (-1) - ((+1)2 x (-1)2 - ((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-1)3)

I guess the first 4 elementary particles and the other 4 elementary particles caused to make 2 separate brahma worlds. And those 8 elementary particles caused to make heavenly worlds. And 16 elementary particles caused to make the Human world, because it is using another dimension which caused to make 16 dimensional levels against it as 16 hells (16 Hells = 8 Cold Hells + 8 Hot Hells). Above the hell levels there are 10 levels. 4 levels for some Animals (maybe fish, insects inside the earth etc), Ghosts, Asura, Humans (human level including mammels, birds etc). And there are 5 levels (good heavens), and the last level (6th heaven  is a highly enjoying Kaama/Mara heaven) (Dark Matter sounds like heavens). But the next 20 levels (20 brahma levels) are almost neutral (without genders). The first 10 brahma levels enjoy bliss (with body) but the next 10 brahma levels are neutral (with mind).

-----------------------
Biblical Questioner:
One thing that these interviews showcase is that no one knows anything at all. Just conjecture, opinion, theory and creed.

Stefano Portoghesi:
@Suresh Madusanka You said that you guess that the first four elementary particles and the other four elementary particles caused the two separate Brahma worlds  ; do you bring any factual evidence in support for your outlandish claim of such event actually having taken place in the universe history ?

Suresh Madusanka:
@Stefano Portoghesi,  I just tried to guess the reason to the formation of brahma worlds mathematically, but the most other things are in the Buddhism. I didn't make it myself. 
According to the Buddhism there are 16 hells (16 Hells = 8 Cold Hells + 8 Hot Hells). Above the hell levels there are 10 levels. 4 levels for Animals , Ghosts, Asura, Humans. And there are 5 levels (good heavens), and the last level (6th heaven  is a highly enjoying Kaama/Mara heaven) (Dark Matter sounds like heavens). But the next 20 levels (20 brahma levels) are almost neutral (without genders). The first 10 brahma levels enjoy bliss (with body) but the next 10 brahma levels are neutral (with mind).

I just added these two lines: 
1.) some Animals  (maybe fish, insects inside the earth etc)
2.) Humans (human level including mammels, birds etc)
Learn more about Buddhist cosmology:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhist_cosmology
https://www.accesstoinsight.org/ptf/dhamma/sagga/loka.html
------------------------------------------------------------

Escape from Samsara: Introduction to Buddhist Cosmology

Suresh Madusanka:
Quantum Physics will prove a lot of things. Mainly only the Down Quarks and Up Quarks make atoms. There are 4 more Quarks which decay into Down Quark and Up Quark in normal conditions. So the high energies inside earth can make two more types of atoms to make hell worlds and hell beings. According to Buddhism there are mainly two groups of hells called Hot hells and Cold hells too. 
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Donald Hoffman - Does Consciousness Cause the Cosmos?

L7:

If all consciousness ceased to exist, what would matter be?  Well, it wouldn't matter much.

Suresh Madusanka:

Think about the start of the consciousness first. The double slit experiment shows us how the previous state of the quantum objects (particles) changed once we measure it. Quantum objects pass the double slit like waves making a wave pattern on the screen, but when we measure it near the screen it goes back in time and comes back to hit the screen like particles to show only two slits on the screen. So it sounds like that our interaction with the quantum objects can change the history of the quantum objects. Same like that, maybe if some natural events caused to form a consciousness to detect an interaction then it can change the history of those natural events which caused to form a consciousness to detect an interaction too. So, maybe that was the first ignorance (Pali: avijjā ) of a consciousness which lost the previous natural events (records) which caused to form a consciousness. And it seems that each and every consciousness is an illusion which sounds like its own creator on its own ignorance. However, the consciousness is just a part of some natural events, but the consciousness is almost fundamental too: 

According to Buddhist quantum physics the origin of the smallest unit of matter, called a “suddhāṭṭhaka.” (sometimes written as suddhāshtaka). These eight never arise in isolation and thus are called “avinibbhoga rupa.” They always rise together; all eight are there in any suddhāṭṭhaka. The relative “amounts” of each component can vary, and thus some suddhāṭṭhaka can be dominated by one element, for example. Even then, all eight are present to some extent.


One’s character (gati) determines one’s future births. The ability to figure that out is called the “nāmarūpa pariccēda ñāna“ (one understands how the mind is related to matter, i.e., how viññāna acts as the critical link between mind and matter.).

(*Read more about "The Origin of Matter – Suddhāṭṭhaka" at Pure Dhamma website.)


We can try to use a new type of mathematics to discover the truth. I guess the mind is based on the first 4 elementary particles in the Universe called 'Maha Bhūta Gati (Gati Bhūta)'  ('Character of matter ghosts/particles') which cause to form another 4 matter elementary particles in the Universe called 'Mahā Bhūta'. And our mind doesn't have a start, because the Universe started to form from the first 4 elementary particles ('Gati Bhūta') which was the first cause to form the mind with the help of other elementary particles. The first relationship of the mind is with the immaterial particles ('Gati Bhūta'), and that immaterial particles caused to make the matter particles ('Mahā Bhūta'), so it sounds like the mind ('Gati Bhūta') made the matter. And mathematically I think the matter particles are under or outside the first 4 elementary particles like this: immaterial particles (matter particles)  OR matter particles (immaterial particles). I guess the particles which are inside the bracket caused to form the particles which are outside the bracket. Eg:  According to this mathematical formula: (a+b)^2=a^2+2ab+b^2

Matter + Antimatter =  (+0-0)^6 + (-0+0)^6 

(+0-0)^6 = (+1-(-1))^3 x (+0.0-0.0)^3


(+1-(-1))^3 =

 (+1)3 - ((+1)3 x (-1) - ((-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-1)2 x (+1) - ((+1)2 x (-1) - ((+1)2 x (-1)2 - ((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-1)3)

There are two sets:

Outside set:

(+1)3 - ((+1)3 x (-1) - ((-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-1)2 x (+1) 

Inside set:

- ((+1)2 x (-1) - ((+1)2 x (-1)2 - ((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-1)3)


I guess, only the life in Brahma worlds and the life in Heavenly worlds could exist if the Universe were not able to form the life on earth (Human world). According to Buddhism our mind use 4 elementary ghosts (active invisible particles) called Character ('gati') ghosts (Character of 4 matter particles) to make matter too, and according to Buddhism almost all the matter particles (mahā bhūta) in the universe came from an interaction of 'Gati Bhūta' ('Character of matter ghosts'/ 'immaterial particles') and the mind which works together. That is where mental energy (immaterial) is converted to matter at the very fundamental stage. So, maybe the Brahma life could form easier than other life forms from a small group of the elementary particles.


According to Quantum Physics almost all the elemantary particles don't have a single Quantum state until we interact with it to measure it, so the elementary particles are a representation of many dimensions at once, and I think it is not a wave, but it interacts like a wave too. The universe is based on dimensional interactions, and the dimensions don't have a position and a speed because of the singularity of the universe. So the physical meaning of the elemantary particles is a representation of the singularity of the early universe too. We can use the duality of the 6 directions of the universe to find the dimensions of the Universe. 


The four mahā bhūta ('Matter') are with four basic “gati”. It says, “gati (character) attracts a similar gati”. Thus “gati” leads to “bhūta,” the first phase of rupa that can be seen (only by Buddha). That is the suddhāṭṭhaka stage.


When enormous numbers of these suddhāṭṭhaka fuse, they get to a more condensed state of “mahā bhūta.” The subtle bodies of Brahmā and some gandhabbā are made of mahā bhūta.


Only when vast amounts of these mahā bhūta fuse together to become even more condensed, that we can see them. At this highly condensed state, the matter is called “dhātu.” Bodies of devas are made of finer dhātu. That is why we cannot see devas, but Brahmā can see them.


Thus our bodies are made of more dense dhātu that we can see. That is why solid objects are called “Pathavi dhātu“;  suddhāṭṭhaka in such solid objects have predominantly Pathavi.


According to the Buddhism there are 16 hells (16 Hells = 8 Cold Hells + 8 Hot Hells). Above the hell levels there are 10 levels. 4 levels for Animals , Ghosts, Asura, Humans. And there are 5 levels (good heavens), and the last level (6th heaven  is a highly enjoying Kaama/Mara heaven) (Dark Matter sounds like heavens). But the next 20 levels (20 brahma levels) are almost neutral (without genders). The first 10 brahma levels enjoy bliss (with body) but the next 10 brahma levels are neutral (with mind).


We can't use Kilogram, Litre, Time, Distance to explain Quantum Physics, Most units are not fundamental, and quantum physics should be based on ratios, dimensions, virtual shapes etc. There is a difference between the Quantum Reality and the Physical Reality. If you want to explain Quantum Physics, then you have to use the Mathematics of the Universe.  I already have enough mathematical explanations to understand quantum physics. If you can't understand the real mathematics of the Universe, then you can't understand science too. Maybe there are a lot of people who can't understand the foundations of mathematics. But without mathematics you can't talk about science. 


- W S M
------------------------------------------------------------------

Bhante Samahita: Early Buddhism, Quantum Physics, and Relativity

Consciousness and the Mystery of Existence - Documentary about Consciousness and Reality (2020)

-------------------------------------------------------

Takht-i-Bahi Buddhist Monastery

Muhammad Aqib Khan:
اگر حکومت اس کو مرمت کر لے اور اسکی تاریخ لوگوں کو بتاۓ اور ٹورازم کے لیے کھول دے اور ملک کا امیج بھی جاےگا دنیا میں اور پیسے بھی آییں گے
(Google translation: "If the government repairs it and tells its history to the people and opens it for tourism, the image of the country will go to the world and more money will come.")

Suresh Madusanka:
He don't know about Buddhism. I'm a Buddhist from Sri Lanka. (I converted from Roman Catholic to Buddhism when I was around 11 years old, but Roman Catholic is much better than Islam. I think the caste system is the main problem in Hinduism.). 

Zee Niazi:
@Suresh Madusanka  What do you know about Islam? Have you even studied the Holy QUR’AN or just from hear & say ?? Or u picked up stuff from Fake News media ??

Suresh Madusanka:
@Zee Niazi , I have watched talks of Zakir Naik on TV too. And I searched about Islam a lot from Muslim sources and Ex-Muslim sources. And I have common sense to understand the problems in Islam. If you want to know about real Islam first of all watch the videos of Apostate Prophet YouTube channel. First of all you should try to learn about the bad side of Islam to take a decision about Islam. There is a very big bad side in Islam.
-------------------------------------------------------
Are there any sects in Buddhism by Waseem Razvi, Australia: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6eU_IfLMstg

Suresh Madusanka:
A good joke. If the name Maithriya sounds like Muhammad, then the name 'Muhammad Rasul' sounds like the Mara (the lord of the death) too.
The Buddha said that the Buddhism is for intelligent people only.
----------------------------------------------------------

The Land of revival of Buddhism in India

Suresh Madusanka:
Very very happy to see these things. And thank you so much for the video. I'm a Buddhist from Sri Lanka. (I converted from Roman Catholic to Buddhism when I was around 11 years old, but Roman Catholic is much better than Islam. I think the caste system is the main problem in Hinduism.). I made a blog about my understanding about Buddhism too (search the blog: buddhist-essentials-and-concepts blogspot).

------------------------------------------------------------------
👻 Metaphysics of Ghosts 👻

Suresh Madusanka:
Very interesting. And Thank you so much for your effort. I think definitely there is a very deep level of quantum physics for Ghosts, Gods, Brahma beings etc. According to Quantum Physics our Atoms have two main elementary particles called Up Quark and Down Quark. I think the Mass is a main thing which separate the worlds of living beings. The Mass of a Down Quark: 4.7+0.5; −0.3 MeV/c^2  (The bare mass of the down quark is not well determined, but probably lies between 4.5 and 5.3 MeV/c^2 or Lattice QCD value : 4.79±0.16 MeV/c^2. It Decays into: Stable or Up quark + Electron + Electron antineutrino.). If the standard Down Quark is just a combination of smaller down quarks, and if there is a Down Quark with a Mass around 0.467 MeV/c^2 (Around 10 times smaller than the standard Down Quark (4.7/10)), and if there is a Down Quark with a Mass around 0.093463 MeV/c^2 (Around 50 times smaller than the standard Down Quark (4.7/50)), then maybe those smaller Quarks can make a new type of Atoms which don't require to interact with our Atoms and our elementary particles, and then it can be very difficult for us to discover those smaller Quarks and other smaller elementary particles. - Suresh

------------------------------------------------------------------
Suresh Madusanka:

My Mathematical Calculation Of The Prediction: 

The Standard Mass of a Down Quark: 4.7 MeV/C^2
The Standard Mass of a Strange Quark: 96 MeV/C^2
The Standard Mass of a Bottom Quark: 4180 MeV/C^2

The mathematical beauty in the elementary particles in the standard model of particle physics:
4180 MeV/C^2 / 96 MeV/C^2 = 43.54166666666667 or around 40
96 MeV/C^2 / 4.7 MeV/C^2 = 20.42553191489362 or around 20

Prediction 1:
4.7 MeV/C^2  / A small Down Quark = around 10
A small Down Quark = 4.7 MeV/C^2  / 10
A small Down Quark = 0.47 MeV/C^2

Prediction 2:
(4.7 MeV/C^2  / 10) / A smaller Down Quark = around 5
A smaller Down Quark = (0.47 MeV/C^2) / 5
A smaller Down Quark = 0.094 MeV/C^2

4180/96 = 43.54166666666667
43.54166666666667 - 40 = 3.541666666666667
3.541666666666667 / 40 = 0.0885416666666667 --- (A)

96/4.7 = 20.42553191489362
20.42553191489362 - 20 = 0.42553191489362
0.42553191489362 / 20 = 0.02127659574468 --- (B)

From (A) and (B)
0.0885416666666667 / 0.021276595744681 = 4.1614583333333

0.02127659574468 / 4.1614583333333 = 0.00511277394615
1 - 0.00511277394615 = 0.99488722605385
4.7 x (0.99488722605385) / 10 = 0.4675969962453 --- (C)

4.7 / 10 = 0.47  --- (D)

From (C) and (D)
0.47 - 0.4675969962453 = 0.0024030037547
0.0024030037547 / 4 = 0.00060075093867
1 - 0.00060075093867335 = 0.9993992490613
0.4675969962453 x (0.9993992490613) / 5 = 0.093463217

The Mass of a smaller Down Quark: 0.093463217 MeV/c^2

Finding a mathematical beauty to guess a precise value:
The Mass of a Down Quark x Spead of light x Spead of light =  X (The 'X' is a something like a very high energy.)

0.093463217 x 299 792 458 x 299 792 458 =  8400055030015297 OR around 8400055030000000

Maybe there is a smaller Down Quark with a Mass around 0.093463217 MeV/c^2 or 0.09346260470850395 MeV/c^2 for 8400000000000000).
 
- W. Suresh Madusanka

------------------------------------------------------------------

Why Meditate? | Ajahn Brahm | 30 October 2020

Suresh Madusanka:
Sadhu Sadhu Sadhu. A wonderful Dhamma talk. Ven. Ajahn Brahm mentioned about Ghosts, I think definitely there is a very deep level of quantum physics for Ghosts, Gods, Brahma beings etc.

John Vectravi:
@Suresh Madusanka That is indeed a lot to digest.

I might reply with one question.

Do you think that gauge gravity duality can be used in anyway to expand our knowledge super symmetry?

Suresh Madusanka:
@John Vectravi, I think gravity belongs to only one dimension (5th dimension). I think all the dimensions are time based lines (lines without strings or size). That is why the time can change when we observe it. (Eg: Double-slit experiment). When we observe/measure a time line (a direction of a quantum particle), then it can cause to change the time of the entangled other time lines too. There are unstable time lines like 0.5 (spin), 2/3, 1/3 (charge) which came from the unstable 6th dimension of the Universe. So we should have a mathematical theory to find all the different types of 'time lines' to understand the symmetry of the Universe.

Suresh Madusanka:
@John Vectravi, According to my mathematical calculations the gravity is a result of the separation from the 6th dimension too, so that can be the duality of the gravity which comes from the Mass (5th dimension) and the anti gravity called the Dark Energy from the 6th dimension.

------------------------------------------------------------------
Dependent Origination Workshop I (part 1) | Ajahn Brahmali and Venerable Sunyo | 31 October 2020

Suresh Madusanka:
Sadhu Sadhu Sadhu 🙏🙏🙏 I specially thank Ven. Ajahn Brahmali for making the dhamma simple and clear. However, I have heard that the Buddha didn't want to teach abhidhamma to humans, so that is why the Buddha chose heaven to teach abhidhamma to heavenly beings, but Ven (Maha Arhat/Enlightened). Sariputta also could listen to that teaching, and he summarized it in order to teach it to humans by himself. So the language and the teaching style of the Ven. Sariputta can make a difference between abhidhamma and the other teachings of the Buddha. And the buddha didn't teach abhidhamma to humans directly. However, I guess the abhidhamma is not a big requirement to be a stream-enterer, but sometimes the abhidhamma sounds like quantum physics to me.

Yong Jie An:
The Buddha did not teach abhidhamma! The Buddha only taught the Dhamma to all including to minks, humans and devas (he taught his mother the Dhamma in the heavens as a form of gratitude)

Suresh Madusanka:
​@Yong Jie An, The Buddha taught Damma to Humans and Davas, but there is a deep teaching called Abhidhamma in Theravada Buddhism which teaches about the mechanism of the mind etc. I don't know whether Mahayana Buddhism teach Abhidhamma or not. I don't know much about Abhidhamma, but I found this information from WikiPedia (Abhidhamma_Piṭaka): 
"Tradition holds that the Buddha thought out the Abhidhamma immediately after his enlightenment then taught it to the gods some years later. Later, the Buddha repeated it to Sariputta who then transmitted it to his disciples. This tradition is evident in the Parivara, a late text from the Vinaya Pitaka, which mentions in a concluding verse of praise to the Buddha that this best of creatures, the lion, taught the three pitakas."
------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Alan Wallace - A Buddhist View of Free Will

------------------------------------------------------------------

The Strange Science of Neutrinos

Suresh Madusanka:
I think the Universe made 16 elementary particles with the nature of matter and another 16 elementary particles against it with the nature of antimatter which caused to annihilate each other, but when the dimensional formations used dimensions to form particles, mass, charge and spin between shared dimensions with dimensional gaps it caused a tiny unbalance in the Ratio of the Matter quarks and Antimatter quarks in the early Universe (3000000001:3000000000) which caused to survive a very small portion of elementary particles (1 from 3000000001).

Where's all the antimatter?

------------------------------------------------------------------

Can we find a theory of everything?

Suresh Madusanka:
Very interesting. Thank you so much for sharing your great knowledge.

Suresh Madusanka:
There are mathematical structures and mathematical ratios between elementary particles:
Finding a mathematical beauty between the elementary particles in the standard model of particle physics:

The Mass of a Up Quark = 2.2 MeV/c^2
The Mass of a Charm Quark = 1280 MeV/c^2
The Mass of a Top Quark = 173100 MeV/c^2

The Mass of a Electron = 0.511 MeV/c^2
The Mass of a Muon = 105.66 MeV/c^2
The Mass of a Tau = 1776.8 MeV/c^2

2.2 / 0.511 = 4.305283757338552  ---- (A)

1280 / 105.66 = 12.11432897974636  ---- (B)

173100 / 1776.8 = 97.42233228275552  ---- (C)

From (B) and (C);
97.42233228275552 / 12.11432897974636 = 8.041909085153082 or around 8  ---- (D)

Bottom Quark 4180 MeV/C^2
  / Strange Quark 96 MeV/C^2
 = 43.5 or around 40  ---- (E)
Strange Quark 96 MeV/C^2
  / Down Quark 4.7 MeV/C^2
 = 20.4 or around 20  ---- (F)

From (E) and (F);
Main Pattern Factor = 40/20 = 2  ---- (G)

From (D) and (G);
8/2 = 4  ---- (H)

From (B) and (H);
12.11432897974636 / 4 =  3.02858224493659 (But (A) = 4.305283757338552)

Finding a mathematical beauty:

173100 / 4180 = 41.41148325358852

1280 / 96 = 13.33333333333333

2.2 / 4.7 = 0.4680851063829787

41.41148325358852 / 13.33333333333333 = 3.105861244019139
-------------------------------------------------------
Finding a mathematical beauty:

173100 / 1280 = 135.234375
Pattern Factor = 2
135.234375 / 2 = 67.6171875 

1280 / 67.6171875 = 18.93009820912767

18.93009820912767 / 4.7 = 4.027680470027164

1280 / 105.66 = 12.11432897974636

173100 / 1776.8 = 97.42233228275552

97.42233228275552 / 41.41148325358852 = 2.352543899144529 or around 2.35 or 4.7/2

A mathematical beauty:
2.352543899144529 x 2 = 4.705087798289058 (around the mass of a down quark)

According to the Pattern of the Down, Strange and Bottom Quarks:
4.7/10 = 0.47 OR around 0.467 MeV/c^2
0.47/5 = 0.094 OR around 0.093463217 MeV/c^2
If the Down Quark is at the center; 
The Mass of a quark in the smaller 3rd quarks group = 4.7 / 50 = 0.094

4.705087798289058 / 50 = 0.0941017559657812 or around 0.093463217 MeV/c^2

The number of standard elementary particles groups (columns) = 3

The most obvious impact between the last particles group with the first particles group of the standard model:
The impact = (The Up quark position / 8) for (The Tau position / 2)
OR
The impact = (The Tau position / 2) for (The Up quark position / 8)
Start of the Pattern Factor = 2
Growth of the Pattern Factor = 2 x 2 x 2 = 8

18.93009820912767 / 8 = 2.366262276140959

(2 + 2.366262276140959)/2 = 2.18313113807048 (around the mass of a up quark)

My calculations show a mathematical beauty between some elementary particles in the Standard Model which can help to find the missing links of the other particles.

- W. Suresh Madusanka
-------------------------------------------------------
Suresh Madusanka:
Finding a mathematical beauty to calculate the Masses of nearest main small elementary particles:

According to the ratios of the Masses there are many Pattern Factors. Eg: The Pattern Factors of Electron, Muon and Tau should be equal to 3. And there are Pattern Factors for Up, Charm and Top quarks around 4 : 8 or 2 : 4 : 8, and it shows an impact to the Electron too.
If we remove the impact to the Tau then the virtual mass of the Tau =  1776.8 x 2 = 3553.6 MeV/c^2

The virtual mass of the Tau 3553.6 MeV/c^2 / The mass of the Muon 105.66 MeV/c^2 = 33.63240583002082
The Pattern Factor of Leptons = 3
The mass of the Muon 105.66 MeV/c^2 / The virtual mass of the Electron = 33.63240583002082 x 3

The virtual mass of the Electron = 105.66 / 100.8972174900625 = 1.047204299864926 MeV/c^2  
The virtual mass of the Electron 1.047204299864926 MeV/c^2 / 2  = 0.5236021499324629is or around the standard mass of the Electron = 0.511 MeV/c^2

So the most possible impacts (ratio);
(The Up quark position / 8) : (The Electron position / 2) : (The Tau position / 2)

Prediction 1:
The virtual mass of the Electron 1.047204299864926 MeV/c^2  / A small Electron = 100.8972174900625 x 3
A small Electron = 1.047204299864926 / 302.6916524701875 = 0.0034596404998914 MeV/c^2
OR A small Electron = 0.511 x 2 / 302.6916524701875 = 0.0033763732552904 MeV/c^2
The most possible Mass of a small Electron = 0.0034 MeV/c^2

Prediction 2:
--------------------
The 1st possibility:
Main Pattern Factor = 2
135.234375 / 2 = 67.6171875 
67.6171875 / 2 = 33.80859375

A small Up Quark = 2.2 / 33.80859375 = 0.0650722125938764 MeV/c^2
But,
A small Up Quark / A small Electron = 0.0650722125938764 / 0.0034 = 19.13888605702246
And, 
A small Up Quark / A small Electron should be equal to around 3.02858224493659 / 4 = 0.7571455612341475
--------------------
The 2nd possibility:
2.2 / 135.234375 = 0.0162680531484691 MeV/c^2
But,
A small Up Quark / A small Electron = 0.0162680531484691 / 0.0034 = 4.784721514255616
And, 
A small Up Quark / A small Electron should be equal to around 0.7571455612341475
--------------------
The 3rd possibility:
1280 / 2.2 = 581.8181818181818
581.8181818181818 / 135.234375 = 4.302295047529016 or around 4
A possible Pattern Factor = 4
A possible Pattern = 4 x 135.234375 x 4 (OR 581.8181818181818 x 4)

The virtual mass of the Up Quark = 18.93009820912767 MeV/c^2
A small Up Quark = 18.93009820912767 / (4 x 135.234375 x 4) = 0.0087487455616997 MeV/c^2
OR A small Up Quark = 2.2 x 8 / 2163.75 = 0.0081340265742345 MeV/c^2
(0.0087487455616997 + 0.0081340265742345) / 2 = 0.0084413860679671
A possible mass of a small Up Quark = 0.008441 MeV/c^2 (OR 0.00874 OR 0.00813 MeV/c^2)
But,
A small Up Quark / A small Electron = 0.00844 / 0.0034 = 2.482352941176471 
And, 
A small Up Quark / A small Electron should be equal to around 0.7571455612341475
--------------------
The 4th possibility:
2.2 / 581.8181818181818 = 0.00378125 MeV/c^2
But,
A small Up Quark / A small Electron = 0.00378125 / 0.0034 = 1.112132352941177
And, 
A small Up Quark / A small Electron should be equal to around 0.7571455612341475
--------------------
The 5th possibility:
2.2 / ((135.234375 x 4) x 3 / 2) = 2.2 / 811.40625 = 0.0027113421914115 MeV/c^2
But,
A small Up Quark / A small Electron = 0.0027113421914115 / 0.0034 = 0.7974535857092647
And, 
A small Up Quark / A small Electron should be equal to around 0.7571455612341475
--------------------
The 6th possibility:
A small Up Quark / A small Electron should be equal to around 0.7571455612341475
So the required mass of a small Up Quark = 0.00844 x (0.7571455612341475 / 2.482352941176471) = 0.00844 x 0.3050112450469314 MeV/c^2
So the most possible Mass of a small Up Quark = 0.0025742949081961 MeV/c^2 OR around 0.00257 MeV/c^2
A small Up Quark / A small Electron = 0.0025742949081961 / 0.0034 = 0.7571455612341471
--------------------
Conclusion: 
It seems that there are many types of small Up Quarks (Upper Quarks).
The most possible main Mass of a small Up Quark should be around 0.00257 MeV/c^2 OR 0.00271 MeV/c^2 OR 0.00844 MeV/c^2 
---------------------------------------------------------
Finding a mathematical beauty:

41.41148325358852 / 13.33333333333333 = 3.105861244019139 (The Pattern Factor = around 3)

13.33333333333333 / 3 = 4.444444444444443 (But; Up Quark 2.2 / Down Quark 4.7 = 0.4680851063829787)
--------------------------------------
If a small Up Quark = 0.00257 MeV/c^2;

A small Up Quark 0.00257 MeV/c^2 / A small Down Quark 0.467 MeV/c^2 = 0.0055032119914347
-------------------
The 1st Possibility:
0.4680851063829787 / 3 = 0.1560283687943262

0.1560283687943262 / 0.0055032119914347 = 28.35223666418296
A possible mass of a small Down Quark = 0.467 MeV/c^2 / 28.35223666418296 = 0.01647 MeV/c^2
-------------------
The 2nd Possibility:
4.444444444444443 / 3 = 1.481481481481481

1.481481481481481 / 0.0055032119914347 = 269.2030551952725
A possible mass of a small Down Quark = 0.467 MeV/c^2 / 269.2030551952725 = 0.00173 MeV/c^2
-------------------
The 3rd Possibility:
The virtual Up Quark 18.93009820912767 / Down Quark 4.7 = 4.027680470027164
4.027680470027164 / 3 =  1.342560156675721

1.342560156675721 / 0.0055032119914347 = 243.9593747733699
A possible mass of a small Down Quark = 0.467 MeV/c^2 / 243.9593747733699 = 0.00191 MeV/c^2
--------------------------------------
If a small Up Quark = 0.00844 MeV/c^2;

A small Up Quark 0.00844 MeV/c^2 / A small Down Quark 0.467 MeV/c^2 = 0.0180728051391863
-------------------
The 1st Possibility:
0.4680851063829787 / 3 = 0.1560283687943262

0.1560283687943262 / 0.0180728051391863 = 8.633323249638665
A possible mass of a small Down Quark = 0.467 MeV/c^2 / 8.633323249638665 = 0.05409 MeV/c^2
-------------------
The 2nd Possibility:
4.444444444444443 / 3 = 1.481481481481481

1.481481481481481 / 0.0180728051391863 = 81.97296822889235
A possible mass of a small Down Quark = 0.467 MeV/c^2 / 81.97296822889235 = 0.005697 MeV/c^2
-------------------
The 3rd Possibility:
The virtual Up Quark 18.93009820912767 / Down Quark 4.7 = 4.027680470027164
4.027680470027164 / 3 =  1.342560156675721

1.342560156675721 / 0.0180728051391863 = 74.28620772127507
A possible mass of a small Down Quark = 0.467 MeV/c^2 / 74.28620772127507 = 0.006286 MeV/c^2
-----------------------------------------------------------
Finding a mathematical beauty:
Down Quark 4.7 / The virtual mass of the Electron 1.047204299864926 = 4.488140471354282 or around 4
Strange Quark 96 / Muon 105.66 = 0.9085746734809767 or around 1
Bottom Quark 4180 / Muon 1776.8 = 2.352543899144529 or around 2

The above Pattern Factors ratio = 4 : 1 : 2
The most possible Pattern Factors = 0.5 : 4 : 1 : 2 OR 2 : 4 : 1 : 2 OR 3 : 4 : 1 : 2

The 1st Possibility:
A possible mass of a small Down Quark 0.00173 / A small Electron 0.0034 = 0.5088235294117647 or around 0.5 
The Pattern Factor of the 0.00173 small Down Quark matches the above most possible Pattern Factor 0.5 which came from this pattern factors 0.5 : 4 : 1 : 2.

The 2nd Possibility:
A possible mass of a small Down Quark 0.006286 / A small Electron 0.0034 = 1.848823529411765 or around 2 
The Pattern Factor of the 0.006286 small Down Quark matches the above most possible Pattern Factor 2 which came from this pattern factors 2 : 4 : 1 : 2.

Final Prediction:
According to the impacts of the most Pattern Factors the most possible previous layer of the Up Quark, Down Quark and Electron:
The most possible Mass of a nearest main small Up Quark (Upper Quark) = 0.00257 MeV/c^2 (OR maximum around 0.008441 MeV/c^2)
The most possible Mass of a nearest main small Down Quark (Lower Quark) = 0.00173 MeV/c^2 (OR maximum around 0.006286 MeV/c^2)
The most possible Mass of a nearest main small Electron (Mini Electron) = 0.0034 MeV/c^2

The 27km long LHC could discover the 4.7 MeV/c^2 particle, and maybe a 100km long LHC or a maximum a 500km long LHC can discover can discover a 0.00257 MeV/c^2 Upper Quark, 0.00173 MeV/c^2 Lower Quark and a 0.0034 MeV/c^2 Mini Electron particles etc.

- W. Suresh Madusanka
Suresh Madusanka:
Combination of the duality of the 6 directions and the 6 distances of the first start of the Universe: (+0-0)^6 + (-0+0)^6 = MATTER + ANTIMATTER
(+0-0)^6
i: (+1-(-1))^3
X
ii: (+0.0-0.0)^3
= ( This should be the Pure Eight (Pali: Suddhātthaka) in Buddhism:
Maybe there is a fundamental cause for the stable existence of the Heat, Solid, Liquid and Gas.
Heat...: + (+1)^3
Solid..: - ((+1)^3 x (-1)
Liquid.: - ((-1)^2 x (+1)^2))
Gas....: + (-1)^2 x (+1)
- (
+ (+1)^2 x (-1)
- ((+1)^2 x (-1)^2
- ((-1)^3 x (+1)))
+ (-1)^3)
)) x
ii: (+0.0-0.0)^3
= ( This should be the 12 elementary particles (of matter) of Standard Model (in particle physics):

01. electron neutrino:
+ (+(1))(+1)^3  
02. electron:
- ((+(1))(+1)^3 x (-1)  
03. down quark:
- ((+(1))(-1)^2 x (+1)^2))  
04. up quark:
+ (+(1))(-1)^2 x (+1)  

- ( 
{ Standard Forces
} AND/OR
{
05. charm quark:
+ (+(1))(+1)^2 x (-1)  
06. strange quark:
- (+(1))((+1)^2 x (-1)^2  
07. muon:
- (+(1))((-1)^3 x (+1)))  
08. muon neutrino:
+ (+(1))(-1)^3  
}
)

- (
09. tau neutrino:
+ (-(1))(+1)^3  
10. tau:
- ((-(1))(+1)^3 x (-1)  
11. bottom quark:
- ((-(1))(-1)^2 x (+1)^2))  
12. top quark:
+ (-(1))(-1)^2 x (+1) 
 
- ( Mini Forces:
13. Mini Z^0 boson:
+ (-(1))(+1)^2 x (-1) 
14. Mini W^+ boson:
- (-(1))((+1)^2 x (-1)^2  
15. Mini gluon:
- (-(1))((-1)^3 x (+1)))  
16. Mini photon:
+ (-(1))(-1)^3))  
))) x 

This should be the Higgs boson field in Standard Model (in particle physics):
17: (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)

OR 

= ( This should be the position and structure of the 12 standard elementary particles and the 4 forces of the Standard Model (in particle physics):

01. electron neutrino (Mass Ratio Array: (i.) 0.0022 | (ii.) 0.000468 | (iii.) 0.000052631 | (iv.) 0.000011198):
+ (+(1))(+1)^3  
02. electron (Mass Ratio Array: (i.) 0.511 | (ii.) 0.1087 | (iii.) 0.01222489 | (iv.) 0.00260104):
- ((+(1))(+1)^3 x (-1)  
03. down quark (Mass Ratio Array: (i.) 4.7 | (ii.) 1 | (iii.) 0.112440192 | (iv.) 0.023923445):
- ((+(1))(-1)^2 x (+1)^2))  
04. up quark (Mass Ratio Array: (i.) 2.2 | (ii.) 0.468 | (iii.) 0.05263159 | (iv.) 0.01119821):
+ (+(1))(-1)^2 x (+1)  

- (
{ Forces:
05. Z^0 boson (Mass Ratio Array: (i.) 91190 | (ii.) 19402.1 | (iii.) 2181.5789475 | (iv.) 464.1657335):
+ (+(1))(+1)^2 x (-1)  
06. W^+ boson (Mass Ratio Array: (i.) 80390 | (ii.) 17104.25 | (iii.) 1923.205742 | (iv.) 409.192711):
- (+(1))((+1)^2 x (-1)^2  
07. gluon:
- (+(1))((-1)^3 x (+1)))  
08. photon:
+ (+(1))(-1)^3
} AND/OR
{
05. charm quark (Mass Ratio Array: (i.) 1280 | (ii.) 272.34 | (iii.) 30.62201 | (iv.) 6.5153212):
+ (+(1))(+1)^2 x (-1)  
06. strange quark (Mass Ratio Array: (i.) 96 | (ii.) 20.4 | (iii.) 2.2966508 | (iv.) 0.4886491):
- (+(1))((+1)^2 x (-1)^2  
07. muon (Mass Ratio Array: (i.) 105.66 | (ii.) 22.48 | (iii.) 2.527754 | (iv.) 0.53782):
- (+(1))((-1)^3 x (+1)))  
08. muon neutrino (Mass Ratio Array: (i.) 0.17 | (ii.) 0.036 | (iii.) 0.004067004 | (iv.) 0.00086532):
+ (+(1))(-1)^3
}
)

- (
{
09. mini neutrino:
+ (-(1))(+1)^3  
10. mini electron:
- ((-(1))(+1)^3 x (-1)  
11. lower quark:
- ((-(1))(-1)^2 x (+1)^2))  
12. upper quark:
+ (-(1))(-1)^2 x (+1) 
} AND/OR
{
09. tau neutrino (Mass Ratio Array: (i.) 18.2 | (ii.) 3.87 | (iii.) 0.435408 | (iv.) 0.09264):
+ (-(1))(+1)^3  
10. tau (Mass Ratio Array: (i.) 1776.8 | (ii.) 378 | (iii.) 42.50727 | (iv.) 9.0441):
- ((-(1))(+1)^3 x (-1)  
11. bottom quark (Mass Ratio Array: (i.) 4180 | (ii.) 889.36 | (iii.) 100 | (iv.) 21.276596):
- ((-(1))(-1)^2 x (+1)^2))  
12. top quark (Mass Ratio Array: (i.) 173100 | (ii.) 36829.787 | (iii.) 4141.148333 | (iv.) 881.09539):
+ (-(1))(-1)^2 x (+1) 
}

- ( 
{ Mini Forces (including Quantum Gravity):
13. Mini Z^0 boson:
+ (-(1))(+1)^2 x (-1) 
14. Mini W^+ boson:
- (-(1))((+1)^2 x (-1)^2  
15. Mini gluon:
- (-(1))((-1)^3 x (+1)))  
16. Mini photon:
+ (-(1))(-1)^3))  
} AND
13. mini charm quark:
+ (-(1))(+1)^2 x (-1) 
14. mini strange quark:
- (-(1))((+1)^2 x (-1)^2  
15. mini muon:
- (-(1))((-1)^3 x (+1)))  
16. mini muon neutrino:
+ (-(1))(-1)^3))  
}

))) x 


17: (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
= nearly: 
( Maybe there are 6 layers of elementary particles with spin (0.5 or 1/2), and Charge 2/3 and -1/3:
((+0.5......-(-0.5......)) + (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) + (+0.5......-(-0.5......))) x 
(2,/3 / (1........x(7/7)) x 1......x(5/5) x 1_..../(3/3) / (1...... x 1_../(1/1)) 
- 1..../3 x (1....../(5/5) x (NEUTRAL)/5 X5) x 1_..../(3/3) / (1.....x(5/5) x (NEUTRAL) x 1_../(1/1)))  x 0.00000

According to my mathematical calculations, the unstable 6th dimension caused to make 1/2 Spin, 2/3 and -1/3 Charge, 6 layers of elementary particles, Combinations of layers etc.
- W. Suresh Madusanka
-------------------------------------------
Suresh Madusanka:
There is space for 6 dimensions because of the 6 directons of the Universe. I have explained how (+1-(-1))3 dimensions combined and make 8 dimensional formations including 4 dimensional forms with 3 dimensions and 4 dimensional forms with 4 dimensions. And then a 5th dimension (+1-(-1)) from this (+0.0-0.0)3 with a strange field (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) which caused to form the 6 quarks, 6 leptons, 4 forces and a strange Higgs boson of the standard model in particle physics.

(+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3

(+0.0-0.0)3 = (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)


Most Possible or Probable Outputs of (+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) : 
 
(+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) = (+0.0-0.0) x (0) x (0) x (+0.0-0.0) ----(A)

(+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) = (+0.000/(0) - 0.000/(0)) x (+0.0x(0)-0.0x(0)) ----(B)

From the (A):

(+0.000 - 0.000) x 1_../(1/1) = (+0.0-0.0) x (0) x (0) x 1..x(1/1) ----(P)

((+0.000 - 0.000) x 1_../(1/1))/ ((0) x 1..x(1/1)) = (+0.0-0.0) x (0) ----(C)

From the (B) and (C):

(+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) = (+0.000/(0) - 0.000/(0)) x ((+0.000 - 0.000) x 1_../(1/1))/ ((0) x 1..x(1/1))

1_..../(3/3) x (+0.0-0.0) = (+0.000/(0) - 0.000/(0)) x (1....x(3/3) x 1_../(1/1))/ ((0) x 1..x(1/1)) ----(Q)

(+0.000/(0) - 0.000/(0)) = 1_..../(3/3) x 1..x(1/1) x (+0.0-0.0) x (0) / (1....x(3/3) x 1_../(1/1))  ----(D)


From the (B) and (D):

(+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) = 1_..../(3/3) x 1..x(1/1) x (+0.0-0.0) x (0) / (1....x(3/3) x 1_../(1/1)) x (+0.0x(0)-0.0x(0))

(+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) = (+0.00-0.00) x (+0.00-0.00) x 1_..../(3/3) x 1..x(1/1) / (1....x(3/3) x 1_../(1/1))


Using this (a+b)^2=a^2+2ab+b^2 mathematical formula to get the Most Possible or Probable outputs of this result: 

(+0.00-0.00) x (+0.00-0.00) x 1_..../(3/3) x 1..x(1/1) / (1....x(3/3) x 1_../(1/1)) 

= (0.00^2 - (1...... x 1......) x 0.00 x 0.00 + 0.00^2) x 1_..../(3/3) x 1....x(3/3) / (1......x(5/5) x 1_../(1/1)) 

= (0.00000/(1......x(5/5)) - (1......) x (NEUTRAL) x 0.00000 /5 X5) + 0.00000/(1......x(5/5))) x 1_..../(3/3) x 1....x(3/3) / ((NEUTRAL) x 1_../(1/1))

= ((0.00000/(1......x(5/5)) + 0.00000/(1......x(5/5))) x 1....x(3/3) - (1......) x 0.00000 x (NEUTRAL)/5 X5 x 1....x(3/3)) x 1_..../(3/3) / ((NEUTRAL) x 1_../(1/1))

Starting to use the 6th dimension. But it makes many small forms of it, because it is unable to make a large main dimension.

= ((0.00000/(1......x(5/5)) + 0.00000/(1......x(5/5))) x 1....x(3/3) - (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) x 1....x(3/3) x 0.00000 x (NEUTRAL)/5 X5) x 1_..../(3/3) / ((NEUTRAL) x 1_../(1/1))

= (((0.00000/(1......x(5/5)) + 0.00000/(1......x(5/5))) x 1....x(3/3)) - ((+0.5......-(-0.5......)) x 1....x(3/3) x 0.00000 x (NEUTRAL)/5 X5)) x 1_..../(3/3) / ((NEUTRAL) x 1_../(1/1))

= (0.00000/(1........x(7/7)) x 2, x 3 /3  x (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) - (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) x 1....x(3/3) x 0.00000 x (NEUTRAL)/5 X5) x 1_..../(3/3) / ((NEUTRAL) x 1_../(1/1))

= (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) x (0.00000/(1........x(7/7)) x 2, x 3 /3 - 1....x(3/3) x 0.00000 x (NEUTRAL)/5 X5) x 1_..../(3/3) / ((NEUTRAL) x 1_../(1/1))

= (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) x (2, x 3 /3 /(1........x(7/7)) - 1....x(3/3) x (NEUTRAL)/5 X5)  x 0.00000 x 1_..../(3/3) / ((NEUTRAL) x 1_../(1/1))

= (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) x 3 x (2,/3 / (1........x(7/7)) - 1..../3 x (NEUTRAL)/5 X5)  x 0.00000 x 1_..../(3/3) / ((NEUTRAL) x 1_../(1/1))

= ((+0.5......-(-0.5......)) + (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) + (+0.5......-(-0.5......))) x (2,/3 / (1........x(7/7)) x 1......x(5/5) - 1..../3 x 1....../(5/5) x (NEUTRAL)/5 X5)  x 0.00000 x 1_..../(3/3) / (1......x(5/5) x (NEUTRAL) x 1_../(1/1))

= ((+0.5......-(-0.5......)) + (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) + (+0.5......-(-0.5......))) x (2,/3 / (1........x(7/7)) x 1......x(5/5) x 1_..../(3/3) / (1...... x 1_../(1/1)) - 1..../3 x (1....../(5/5) x (NEUTRAL)/5 X5) x 1_..../(3/3) / (1.....x(5/5) x (NEUTRAL) x 1_../(1/1)))  x 0.00000

So, the final output of this (+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) is nearly: ((+0.5......-(-0.5......)) + (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) + (+0.5......-(-0.5......))) x (2,/3 / (1........x(7/7)) x 1......x(5/5) x 1_..../(3/3) / (1...... x 1_../(1/1)) - 1..../3 x (1....../(5/5) x (NEUTRAL)/5 X5) x 1_..../(3/3) / (1.....x(5/5) x (NEUTRAL) x 1_../(1/1)))  x 0.00000

According to the Standard Model of Particle Physics, 
the Spin of most elementary particles = 1/2 (or 0.5)
the Charge of some Quarks = 2/3
the Charge of other Quarks = -1/3
the Charge of electrons = -1

According to my mathematical calculations the 6th +1-1 dimension is unstable, because already there are +0.5-0.5 half dimension with larger +2/3 dimension against the -1/3 dimension, so that is why those dimensions behave like Spin and Charge of elementary particles. 

I think my mathematical calculations clearly show a similarity to the elementary particles of the Standard Model in Particle Physics.

- W. Suresh Madusanka
(That was the second part of My Theory Of Everything.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------

The Entanglement Of Mathematical Structures Of The Elementary Particles Theory by Suresh

-----------------------------------------------

Is supersymmetry real?

-----------------------------------------------

LEAVING ISLAM CONSEQUENCES

Suresh Madusanka:
Some Imams, Sheikhs Promote Rape, Revenge & Etc:
'Use that atom bomb' — Top Islamic scholar calls for Pakistan to drop nuclear bomb on Europe over Prophet Muhammad 'slanderers':  rmx.news/article/article/use-that-atom-bomb-top-islamic-scholar-calls-for-pakistan-to-drop-nuclear-bomb-on-europe-over-prophet-muhammad-slanderers

-----------------------------------------------

Uncertainty | Ajahn Brahm | 6 November 2020


The Future of Consciousness in the Universe ~ Documentary 2020

-----------------------------------------------

Can Future Colliders Break the Standard Model?

Will A New Neutrino Change The Standard Model?

Beyond the Higgs: What's Next for the LHC? - with Harry Cliff

How do you detect a neutrino?

-----------------------------------------------

Why You Should Practice Buddhism

Suresh Madusanka:
Interesting

Path 2 Fruit:
Thanks for stopping by. Do you practice Buddhism?

Suresh Madusanka:
@Path 2 Fruit, Yes, I try to practice, but I hope to practice more within few years. I think Maha satipatthana Sutta is the most important Buddhist Sutta. I made a short video about it and I listen to that meditation and sometimes I practice it myself too. You can watch it from here: But not in English (with the loving kindness meditation): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tshq91WE7Uk

English version (without the loving kindness meditation): Listen to this Vipassana Meditation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQsxovCJR4M

-----------------------------------------------

Dependent Origination Workshop || (part 5) | Ajahn Brahmali and Venerable Sunyo | 7 November 2020

Suresh Madusanka:
Sadhu Sadhu Sadhu.. Thanks for the profound explanations. I like to share few details with comments readers: The Karma is not the only thing which cause problems to us. But also heredity, environment, nature and nurture cause problems. According to Buddhism, there are five orders or processes (niyama) which operate in the physical and mental realms.

They are:
Utu Niyama - physical inorganic order, e.g. seasonal phenomena of winds and rains. The unerring order of seasons, characteristic seasonal changes and events, causes of winds and rains, nature of heat, etc., all belong to this group.

Bija Niyama - order of germs and seeds (physical organic order), e.g. rice produced from rice-seed, sugary taste from sugar-cane or honey, peculiar characteristics of certain fruits, etc. The scientific theory of cells and genes and the physical similarity of twins may be ascribed to this order.

Karma Niyama - order of act and result, e.g., desirable and undesirable acts produce corresponding good and bad results. As surely as water seeks its own level so does Karma, given opportunity, produce its inevitable result, not in the form of a reward or punishment but as an innate sequence. This sequence of deed and effect is as natural and necessary as the way of the sun and the moon.

Dhamma Niyama - order of the norm, e.g., the natural phenomena occurring at the advent of a Bodhisattva in his last birth. Gravitation and other similar laws of nature. The natural reason for being good and so forth, may be included in this group.

Citta Niyama - order or mind or psychic law, e.g., processes of consciousness, arising and perishing of consciousness, constituents of consciousness, power of mind, etc., including telepathy, telaesthesia, retro-cognition, premonition, clairvoyance, clairaudience, thought-reading and such other psychic phenomena which are inexplicable to modern science. 

It’s nature, nurture, genes & karma that shape our future.

Most people misunderstand Karma/Vipaka, and there are more reasons for good and bad results (Vipaka). Maybe we can call it dependant origination, because our same Karma (action) can give different results on dependant origination (Patichcha Samuppadaya).

frank boase:
Suresh Madusanka

So far as the last 3 lines

"Maybe we can call it dependant origination, because our same Karma (action) can give different results on dependant origination (Patichcha Samuppadaya)"

I understand, then, with those 3 lines, you lose me.

Please explain.

Suresh Madusanka:
@frank boase, ​ The five orders or processes (five niyama) are not only separated processes, but also sometimes those processes (niyama) interact with each other. Eg: If someone has very good previous Karma (Actions) and if they continue to do very good Karma, then it can cause to change other processes (niyama) like the order of germs and seeds (Bija Niyama). And also if we have a good scientific technology to fix the problems in the order of germs and seeds (Changing the Bija Niyama) then it can cause to change the Karma Niyama (order of act and result). So sometimes the Bija Niyama depends on Karma Niyama and also the Karma Niyama depends on Bija Niyama. And sometimes our new actions (new Karma) are strong enough to change other processes (niyama) too. So I think we can apply the dependent origination to the five orders or processes (niyama) too.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Dependent Origination Workshop ||| (part 6) | Ajahn Brahmali and Venerable Sunyo | 14 November 2020

Suresh Madusanka:
The word Vijjā sounds like 'Science' or 'Technology' in Sinhala language (The Tipitaka was first written using Sinhala scripts). So maybe the meaning of the word Avijjā can be something like 'not knowing the science/technology' or 'not the standard science/technology (because the standard science/technology breaks down at the quantum level on the illusion of time)' or 'illusion'. And the meaning of the word 'Veda' is 'knowledge', so I don't think that the word Vijjā is much similar to the word 'Veda'.

I have a my own explanation about a good reason to guess the cause to make an illusion to form a conciousness being:

The double slit experiment shows us how the previous state of the quantum objects (particles) changed once we measure it. Quantum objects pass the double slit like waves making a wave pattern on the screen, but when we measure it near the screen it goes back in time and comes back to hit the screen like particles to show only two slits on the screen. So it sounds like that our interaction with the quantum objects can change the history of the quantum objects. Same like that, maybe if some natural events caused to form a consciousness to detect an interaction then it can change the history of those natural events which caused to form a consciousness to detect an interaction too. So, maybe that was the first ignorance (Pali: avijjā ) of a consciousness which lost the previous natural events (records) which caused to form a consciousness. And it seems that each and every consciousness is an illusion which sounds like its own creator on its own ignorance. However, the consciousness is just a part of some natural events, but the consciousness is almost fundamental too:

According to Buddhist quantum physics the origin of the smallest unit of matter, called a “suddhāṭṭhaka.” (sometimes written as suddhāshtaka). These eight never arise in isolation and thus are called “avinibbhoga rupa.” They always rise together; all eight are there in any suddhāṭṭhaka. The relative “amounts” of each component can vary, and thus some suddhāṭṭhaka can be dominated by one element, for example. Even then, all eight are present to some extent.


Suresh Madusanka:
Another meaning to the word 'Vijjā' in Sinhala language is 'Magic', maybe because the word Vijjā sounds like 'Applying A Hidden Scientific Technology'. So maybe the meaning of the word 'Avijjā' sounds like 'Applying A Hidden Unscientific Technology' or 'Applying A Hidden Unacceptable Scientific Technology' or simply 'An Unacceptable Science' too.! I think the 'double slit experiment' shows us a something like 'Magic' from 'A Hidden Scientifically Unacceptable Technology'. However, maybe there are many meanings to the word Avijjā like 'Ignorence', 'Not Knowledge' etc.

S
uresh Madusanka:
There are 3 dimensions for space and 1 dimension for time. But the main 6 directions of the Universe can have 6 dimensions. I think the Gravity belongs to only one dimension (5th dimension). And I think all the dimensions are time based lines (lines without strings or size). That is why the time can change when we observe it (Eg: Double-slit experiment). When we observe/measure a time line (a direction of a quantum particle), then it can cause to change the time of the entangled other time lines too. There are unstable time lines like 0.5 (spin), 2/3, -1/3 (charge) which came from the unstable 6th dimension of the Universe. So we should have a mathematical theory to find all the different types of 'time lines' to understand the symmetry of the Universe. According to my mathematical calculations the Gravity is a result of the separation from the symmetry between 5 and 6 dimensions to make the 5th stable dimension using a part from the 6th dimension making the 6th dimension unstable. So that can be the duality of the gravity which comes from the Mass (5th dimension) and the anti gravity called the Dark Energy from the 6th dimension.


The Universe should be balanced because it is symmetric. (The separation of the symmetry: (+0.0-0.0) x (+0.0-0.0) x (+0.0-0.0)) = (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0))

The duality of the 6 directions and the 6 distances of the first start of the Universe: (+0-0)^6 + (-0+0)^6 = MATTER + ANTIMATTER
(+0-0)^6

i: (+1-(-1))^3
X
ii: (+0.0-0.0)^3
= ( This should be the Pure Eight (Pali: Suddhātthaka) in Buddhism:
Maybe there is a fundamental cause for the stable existence of the Heat, Solid, Liquid and Gas.
Step 1:
(+1-(-1))^3 =
Heat...: + (+1)^3
Solid..: - ((+1)^3 x (-1)
Liquid.: - ((-1)^2 x (+1)^2))
Gas....: + (-1)^2 x (+1)
- (
+ (+1)^2 x (-1)
- ((+1)^2 x (-1)^2
- ((-1)^3 x (+1)))
+ (-1)^3)
)) x
ii: (+0.0-0.0)^3

Step 2:
(+0.0-0.0)^3 = (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
Step 1 = (+1-(-1))^3 = 8 elementary particles 
(Step 1) x (Step 2) =
(+1-(-1))^3 x  (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) = 8 elementary particles x  (+(1)-(-(1))) = 16 elementary particles x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)

Step 3:
(0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
= nearly: 
( Maybe there are 6 layers of elementary particles with spin (0.5 or 1/2), and Charge 2/3 and -1/3:
((+0.5......-(-0.5......)) + (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) + (+0.5......-(-0.5......))) x 1_..../(3/3) / 1_../(1/1) x (2,/3 / (1........x(7/7)) / 1......x(5/5) / (NEUTRAL)x(5/5) - 1....,/3) x 0.00000

According to my mathematical calculations, the unstable 6th dimension caused to make 1/2 Spin, 2/3 and -1/3 Charge, 6 layers of elementary particles, Combinations of layers etc.

- W. Suresh Madusanka

-----------------------------------------------

Our Mathematical Universe with Max Tegmark

Q&A - The mathematical universe with Max Tegmark

The Next Big Breakthrough in our Understanding of the Universe

Anirban Bandyopadhyay - Does Consciousness Defeat Materialism?

Julian Barbour on Time, the Universe, and Reality | Closer To Truth Chats

Farva Ali Khan:
Time is but a stubborn illusion ~Einstein .These kind of chats are interesting!

Suresh Madusanka:
I think the Universe is based on time lines. 
-----------------------------------------------
Julian Barbour on "The Janus Point: A New Theory of Time" | Closer To Truth Chats: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMD8B7VRX0w

Linus N:
Robert Kuhn is superb and his work has enlightened so many of us. Thank you Sir for the marvellous “Closer To The Truth”!

Closer To Truth:
Thanks, appreciate - but no "the" ;-)  Robert

Suresh Madusanka:
​@Closer To Truth, I have a theory of everything:
You can read more about my thoery from here (Page): 'The thoery of everything' at 'buddhist-essentials-and-concepts blogspot'
I tried to explain my theory to many people from few month. I don't know who could understand my theory about the entanglement of mathematical structures of the elementary particles (entangled time lines).
Thank you.
-----------------------------------------------
Piracy of the mind - Armadale Meditation Group | Venarable Sunyo | 24 November 2020

Suresh Madusanka:
Sadhu Sadhu Sadhu. Ven.Sunyo thero gives very good Dhamma talks. I usually practice Vidarshana meditation, but when I need energy to prepare my mind I practice Samatha meditation to make a Samadhi (concentration) in my mind, and I guess the Samadhi arise between awaking and sleeping, so sometimes I try to sleep and stay awake at the same time when I practice Samadhi Meditation (My meditation Mantra (translated to English from Sinhala) = imbe.....(impermanant beings) be...... well......).!! 
-----------------------------------------------

How to record a ghost particle – Public lecture by Dr. Wes Ketchum

Suresh Madusanka:
A wonderful lecture. Thank you so much for the information and profound presentation. Maybe that Neutrino Ghosts will show us ways to reveal a lot of hidden secrets of the Universe. 
-----------------------------------------------

Garrett Lisi - Which Laws of Nature are Fundamental?

Kevin Phillips:
This really cries out for a 3D animation. Obviously, everyone in the comments is clueless.

Suresh Madusanka:
There are Elementary Ghosts called Pure Eight (Pali: Suddhātthaka) in Buddhism. And If we can explain the Mathematical Structures of it, then maybe we will be able to make a 3D or 6D animation of it too. 
-----------------------------------------------

Ancient Brahmi Buddhist secret & script

Suresh Madusanka:
Hinduism is a later development of brahmanism.

Theoria Apophasis:
no such thing, hinduism is not a religion, but a peoples

Suresh Madusanka:
@Theoria Apophasis Yes. And maybe they use the word Hinduism (rulers and brahamins of india use Hindu Books like Mahabharat ) to make a unity between many different types of people. Thanks for your reply.

No comments:

Post a Comment